Key stakeholders' views on the causes of medicine stock-outs in Mauritania: A qualitative study.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304930
Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed, Issa Coulibaly, Raffaella Ravinetto, Verónica Trasancos Buitrago, Catherine Dujardin
{"title":"Key stakeholders' views on the causes of medicine stock-outs in Mauritania: A qualitative study.","authors":"Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed, Issa Coulibaly, Raffaella Ravinetto, Verónica Trasancos Buitrago, Catherine Dujardin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0304930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of medicine stock-outs is increasing globally. In Mauritania, they are recurring, although, to our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted to determine the causes. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore the views of key stakeholders in the pharmaceutical sector to identify the main local or national causes of stock-outs. It will thus provide a common understanding and guide policy-makers towards corrective action. The study was carried out in five health districts and at the regional and central levels. The samples were purposive. Two focus groups and twenty semi-structured individual interviews were held with 38 participants, including health professionals, managers from the Central Purchasing Office for Essential Medicines and Consumables, the Pharmacy and Laboratory Department and the Ministry of Health. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was carried out. Our findings indicate the national causes of medicine stock-outs at three healthcare system levels (operational, regional, and central). They were grouped into five categories: insufficient human resource capacity (number of staff, training, retention), communication and coordination problems between stakeholders, logistical constraints (transport, storage), financial constraints, inadequate forecasting of needs, and complex procurement procedures. These causes of medicine stock-outs are interconnected, and many could be addressed locally through solutions initiated and led by the Mauritanian authorities. To address medicine stock-outs sustainably, we suggest and discuss some possible actions, including reforms to improve Central Purchasing Office for Essential Medicines and Consumables's governance and accountability and, more broadly, to strengthen the various pillars of the local health and pharmaceutical system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0304930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of medicine stock-outs is increasing globally. In Mauritania, they are recurring, although, to our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted to determine the causes. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore the views of key stakeholders in the pharmaceutical sector to identify the main local or national causes of stock-outs. It will thus provide a common understanding and guide policy-makers towards corrective action. The study was carried out in five health districts and at the regional and central levels. The samples were purposive. Two focus groups and twenty semi-structured individual interviews were held with 38 participants, including health professionals, managers from the Central Purchasing Office for Essential Medicines and Consumables, the Pharmacy and Laboratory Department and the Ministry of Health. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic content analysis was carried out. Our findings indicate the national causes of medicine stock-outs at three healthcare system levels (operational, regional, and central). They were grouped into five categories: insufficient human resource capacity (number of staff, training, retention), communication and coordination problems between stakeholders, logistical constraints (transport, storage), financial constraints, inadequate forecasting of needs, and complex procurement procedures. These causes of medicine stock-outs are interconnected, and many could be addressed locally through solutions initiated and led by the Mauritanian authorities. To address medicine stock-outs sustainably, we suggest and discuss some possible actions, including reforms to improve Central Purchasing Office for Essential Medicines and Consumables's governance and accountability and, more broadly, to strengthen the various pillars of the local health and pharmaceutical system.

主要利益相关者对毛里塔尼亚药品缺货原因的看法:一项定性研究。
全球药品缺货的数量正在增加。在毛里塔尼亚,这些疾病反复出现,尽管据我们所知,尚未进行任何研究以确定其原因。因此,本定性研究旨在探讨制药部门主要利益相关者的观点,以确定缺货的主要地方或国家原因。因此,它将提供一种共同的理解,并指导决策者采取纠正行动。这项研究是在五个卫生区以及在区域和中央两级进行的。这些样本是有目的的。对38名参与者进行了两个焦点小组和20次半结构化个人访谈,其中包括保健专业人员、基本药物和消耗品中央采购办公室、药房和实验室司以及卫生部的管理人员。所有的采访都有录音和文字记录。进行了专题内容分析。我们的研究结果表明,在三个医疗保健系统层面(操作,区域和中央),药品缺货的国家原因。它们被分为五类:人力资源能力不足(工作人员数量、培训、保留)、利益攸关方之间的沟通和协调问题、后勤限制(运输、储存)、财政限制、需求预测不足和采购程序复杂。药品缺货的这些原因是相互关联的,许多问题可以通过毛里塔尼亚当局发起和领导的解决办法在当地得到解决。为了可持续地解决药品缺货问题,我们建议并讨论了一些可能的行动,包括改进基本药物和耗材中央采购办公室的治理和问责制的改革,以及更广泛地加强地方卫生和医药系统的各个支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信