The association between four neighborhood disadvantage indices and child chronic health classifications.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kahir Jawad, Yana B Feygin, Michelle Stevenson, Bethany A Wattles, Jennifer Porter, V Faye Jones, Deborah Winders Davis
{"title":"The association between four neighborhood disadvantage indices and child chronic health classifications.","authors":"Kahir Jawad, Yana B Feygin, Michelle Stevenson, Bethany A Wattles, Jennifer Porter, V Faye Jones, Deborah Winders Davis","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04143-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neighborhood advantage/disadvantage is a social determinant of health. We aimed to examine the distribution and associations between child chronic health conditions and four commonly used indices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with outpatient visits and valid addresses (n = 115,738) were included and outcomes were categorized as having no chronic disease (N-CD), non-complex chronic disease (NC-CD), and complex chronic disease (C-CD). Four measures of neighborhood characteristics (Child Opportunity Index, Area Deprivation Index, Neighborhood Disadvantage Index, Social Vulnerability Index were calculated from census data. Separate multinomial logistic regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The indices' scores were correlated (r = 0.80-0.92). Children in low opportunity or high disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability neighborhoods were more likely to be diagnosed with C-CD than those in high opportunity or low disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability neighborhoods. The increased odds ranged from 5% to 39%. The adjusted odds of NC-CD were found to increase by 8-31% as the neighborhood opportunity declined or the disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased, across all indices. The association grew stronger as neighborhood opportunity decreased, or disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased for all four indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each instrument was associated with medical complexity classifications, but the magnitude of the associations differed slightly. The rationale for choosing a measure of neighborhood characteristics should be based on the study's aims and population.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study evaluates the associations of four commonly used neighborhood indices with medical complexity classifications. All indices were associated with study outcomes. The Area Disadvantage Index (ADI) and Child Opportunity Index (COI) demonstrated incremental increases in the odds of receiving a classification of complex chronic disease (C-CD) compared to no chronic disease (N-CD) as neighborhood opportunity decreased or the disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased. Being classified with a non-complex chronic disease (NC-CD) compared to N-CD, only the association with the COI increased incrementally at each level of opportunity. Study outcomes and index characteristics must be considered when designing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04143-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neighborhood advantage/disadvantage is a social determinant of health. We aimed to examine the distribution and associations between child chronic health conditions and four commonly used indices.

Methods: Children with outpatient visits and valid addresses (n = 115,738) were included and outcomes were categorized as having no chronic disease (N-CD), non-complex chronic disease (NC-CD), and complex chronic disease (C-CD). Four measures of neighborhood characteristics (Child Opportunity Index, Area Deprivation Index, Neighborhood Disadvantage Index, Social Vulnerability Index were calculated from census data. Separate multinomial logistic regression models were used.

Results: The indices' scores were correlated (r = 0.80-0.92). Children in low opportunity or high disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability neighborhoods were more likely to be diagnosed with C-CD than those in high opportunity or low disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability neighborhoods. The increased odds ranged from 5% to 39%. The adjusted odds of NC-CD were found to increase by 8-31% as the neighborhood opportunity declined or the disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased, across all indices. The association grew stronger as neighborhood opportunity decreased, or disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased for all four indicators.

Conclusions: Each instrument was associated with medical complexity classifications, but the magnitude of the associations differed slightly. The rationale for choosing a measure of neighborhood characteristics should be based on the study's aims and population.

Impact: This study evaluates the associations of four commonly used neighborhood indices with medical complexity classifications. All indices were associated with study outcomes. The Area Disadvantage Index (ADI) and Child Opportunity Index (COI) demonstrated incremental increases in the odds of receiving a classification of complex chronic disease (C-CD) compared to no chronic disease (N-CD) as neighborhood opportunity decreased or the disadvantage/deprivation/vulnerability increased. Being classified with a non-complex chronic disease (NC-CD) compared to N-CD, only the association with the COI increased incrementally at each level of opportunity. Study outcomes and index characteristics must be considered when designing studies.

四项邻里不利指标与儿童慢性健康分类的关系。
背景:邻里优势/劣势是健康的社会决定因素。我们的目的是检查儿童慢性健康状况和四个常用指标之间的分布和关联。方法:纳入门诊就诊和有效地址的儿童(n = 115738),结果分为无慢性疾病(n - cd)、非复杂慢性疾病(NC-CD)和复杂慢性疾病(C-CD)。根据人口普查数据,计算出儿童机会指数、区域剥夺指数、邻里不利指数、社会脆弱性指数4个邻里特征指标。采用单独的多项逻辑回归模型。结果:各指标评分具有相关性(r = 0.80 ~ 0.92)。低机会或高劣势/剥夺/脆弱性社区的儿童比高机会或低劣势/剥夺/脆弱性社区的儿童更容易被诊断为C-CD。增加的几率从5%到39%不等。在所有指数中,随着邻里机会的减少或劣势/剥夺/脆弱性的增加,NC-CD的调整几率增加了8-31%。随着邻里机会的减少,或所有四个指标的不利/剥夺/脆弱性的增加,这种关联变得更强。结论:每种仪器都与医学复杂性分类相关,但关联程度略有不同。选择社区特征度量的基本原理应基于研究的目的和人口。影响:本研究评估了四种常用邻域指数与医疗复杂性分类的关系。所有指标均与研究结果相关。区域劣势指数(ADI)和儿童机会指数(COI)显示,与无慢性病(N-CD)相比,随着社区机会减少或劣势/剥夺/脆弱性增加,获得复杂慢性病(C-CD)分类的几率逐渐增加。与N-CD相比,被归类为非复杂慢性疾病(NC-CD),只有与COI的关联在每个机会水平上逐渐增加。在设计研究时必须考虑研究结果和指标特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信