Stimulus uncertainty and relative reward rates determine adaptive responding in perceptual decision-making.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Luis de la Cuesta-Ferrer, Christina Koß, Sarah Starosta, Nils Kasties, Daniel Lengersdorf, Frank Jäkel, Maik C Stüttgen
{"title":"Stimulus uncertainty and relative reward rates determine adaptive responding in perceptual decision-making.","authors":"Luis de la Cuesta-Ferrer, Christina Koß, Sarah Starosta, Nils Kasties, Daniel Lengersdorf, Frank Jäkel, Maik C Stüttgen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In dynamic environments, animals must select actions based on sensory input as well as expected positive and negative consequences. This type of behavior is typically studied using perceptual decision making (PDM) tasks. The arguably most influential framework for describing the cognitive processes underlying PDM is signal detection theory (SDT). One central assumption of SDT is that observers make perceptual decisions by comparing sensory evidence to a static decision criterion. However, mounting evidence suggests that the criterion is in fact highly dynamic and that observers adjust it flexibly according to task demands. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which observers integrate stimulus and reward information for adaptive criterion learning remain not well understood. Here, we systematically investigated the factors influencing criterion setting at the single-trial level. To that end, we first specified three SDT-based models that learn either from reward, reward omission, or both. Next, by concomitantly manipulating stimulus and reward probabilities, we constructed experimental conditions in which these models make divergent predictions. Finally, we subjected rats and pigeons to a PDM task comprising these conditions. We find that subjects adopted decision criteria that maximize total reward in all experimental conditions. Detailed behavioral analyses reveal that criterion learning is driven by the integration of rewards, not reward omissions, and that reward integration is influenced by two additional factors: first, the degree of stimulus uncertainty, and second, the difference in the relative reward rates (rather than the absolute reward rates) between the choice alternatives. A model incorporating these factors accounts well for criterion dynamics across experimental conditions for both species and links signal detection theory to a learning mechanism operating at the level of single trials which, in the steady state, produces behavior similar to the matching law, a central tenet of learning theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 5","pages":"e1012636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dynamic environments, animals must select actions based on sensory input as well as expected positive and negative consequences. This type of behavior is typically studied using perceptual decision making (PDM) tasks. The arguably most influential framework for describing the cognitive processes underlying PDM is signal detection theory (SDT). One central assumption of SDT is that observers make perceptual decisions by comparing sensory evidence to a static decision criterion. However, mounting evidence suggests that the criterion is in fact highly dynamic and that observers adjust it flexibly according to task demands. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which observers integrate stimulus and reward information for adaptive criterion learning remain not well understood. Here, we systematically investigated the factors influencing criterion setting at the single-trial level. To that end, we first specified three SDT-based models that learn either from reward, reward omission, or both. Next, by concomitantly manipulating stimulus and reward probabilities, we constructed experimental conditions in which these models make divergent predictions. Finally, we subjected rats and pigeons to a PDM task comprising these conditions. We find that subjects adopted decision criteria that maximize total reward in all experimental conditions. Detailed behavioral analyses reveal that criterion learning is driven by the integration of rewards, not reward omissions, and that reward integration is influenced by two additional factors: first, the degree of stimulus uncertainty, and second, the difference in the relative reward rates (rather than the absolute reward rates) between the choice alternatives. A model incorporating these factors accounts well for criterion dynamics across experimental conditions for both species and links signal detection theory to a learning mechanism operating at the level of single trials which, in the steady state, produces behavior similar to the matching law, a central tenet of learning theory.

刺激不确定性和相对奖励率决定了知觉决策中的适应性反应。
在动态环境中,动物必须根据感官输入以及预期的积极和消极后果来选择行动。这种类型的行为通常使用感知决策(PDM)任务进行研究。描述PDM认知过程的最有影响力的框架是信号检测理论(SDT)。SDT的一个中心假设是,观察者通过比较感官证据和静态决策标准来做出感知决策。然而,越来越多的证据表明,这个标准实际上是高度动态的,观察者可以根据任务需求灵活地调整它。然而,观察者将刺激和奖励信息整合到适应性标准学习的机制仍然没有得到很好的理解。在这里,我们系统地研究了影响单试验水平标准设定的因素。为此,我们首先指定了三个基于sdt的模型,这些模型可以从奖励、奖励遗漏或两者中学习。接下来,通过同时操纵刺激和奖励概率,我们构建了实验条件,使这些模型做出不同的预测。最后,我们让大鼠和鸽子完成一个包含这些条件的PDM任务。我们发现,在所有的实验条件下,受试者都采用了总奖励最大化的决策准则。详细的行为分析表明,标准学习是由奖励整合驱动的,而不是奖励遗漏,奖励整合受到两个额外因素的影响:第一,刺激不确定性的程度,第二,选择方案之间相对奖励率(而不是绝对奖励率)的差异。结合这些因素的模型很好地解释了两种物种在实验条件下的标准动态,并将信号检测理论与在单次试验水平上运行的学习机制联系起来,该机制在稳定状态下产生类似于匹配定律的行为,这是学习理论的核心原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信