Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 T Cell Immunity in COVID-19-Naive Vaccinated Individuals with and Without Spike Protein IgG Antibodies.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Vassiliki C Pitiriga, Myrto Papamentzelopoulou, Dimitris Nikoloudis, Chrysa Saldari, Kanella E Konstantinakou, Irene V Vasileiou, Athanasios Tsakris
{"title":"Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 T Cell Immunity in COVID-19-Naive Vaccinated Individuals with and Without Spike Protein IgG Antibodies.","authors":"Vassiliki C Pitiriga, Myrto Papamentzelopoulou, Dimitris Nikoloudis, Chrysa Saldari, Kanella E Konstantinakou, Irene V Vasileiou, Athanasios Tsakris","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14050415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The effective management of vaccination schedules requires thorough knowledge of an individual's immunoprotection level, including the interaction and persistence of immune responses at both the humoral and cellular levels following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between the levels and duration of the SARS-CoV-2 T cell response and IgG measurements in a cohort of COVID-19-naive individuals who had received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis utilizing data retrieved from the electronic medical records of consecutive COVID-19-naive and vaccinated adult individuals who underwent COVID-19 immunity screening at a private healthcare center from September 2021 to September 2022. T cell response was evaluated using the IGRA methodology T-SPOT<sup>®</sup>.COVID (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). <b>Results:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 262 individuals, comprising 148 females (56.5%) and 114 males (43.5%), with ages ranging from 17 to 92 years (mean age: 59.47 ± 15.5 years). Among the participants, 216/262 (82.4%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (group A), while 46/262 (17.6%) tested positive (group B). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the time period post vaccination, with the mean times after vaccination being 136.38 ± 78.68 days in group A and 140.6 ± 79.5 days in group B (T-test, <i>p</i> = 0.74). Among the two groups, a positive T cell reaction against the S antigen was reported in 132/216 (61.1%) participants in group A and 39/46 (84.8%) in group B (<i>X</i><sup>2</sup> test, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Additionally, individuals with a positive antibody response demonstrated statistically significant higher T SPOT results compared to those with undetectable antibody levels, with a mean SFC count of 125.70 for group A and 158.73 for group B (Mann-Whitney test, <i>p</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that T cell immunity may persist even when antibodies are undetectable, highlighting the potential role of cellular immunity in providing protection against COVID-19 over time. Additionally, this study demonstrates a significant correlation between humoral and cellular immune response levels to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that the activation of humoral immunity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with higher levels of cellular immunity compared to individuals with undetectable antibody levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14050415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effective management of vaccination schedules requires thorough knowledge of an individual's immunoprotection level, including the interaction and persistence of immune responses at both the humoral and cellular levels following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between the levels and duration of the SARS-CoV-2 T cell response and IgG measurements in a cohort of COVID-19-naive individuals who had received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Methods: We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis utilizing data retrieved from the electronic medical records of consecutive COVID-19-naive and vaccinated adult individuals who underwent COVID-19 immunity screening at a private healthcare center from September 2021 to September 2022. T cell response was evaluated using the IGRA methodology T-SPOT®.COVID (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 262 individuals, comprising 148 females (56.5%) and 114 males (43.5%), with ages ranging from 17 to 92 years (mean age: 59.47 ± 15.5 years). Among the participants, 216/262 (82.4%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (group A), while 46/262 (17.6%) tested positive (group B). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the time period post vaccination, with the mean times after vaccination being 136.38 ± 78.68 days in group A and 140.6 ± 79.5 days in group B (T-test, p = 0.74). Among the two groups, a positive T cell reaction against the S antigen was reported in 132/216 (61.1%) participants in group A and 39/46 (84.8%) in group B (X2 test, p = 0.002). Additionally, individuals with a positive antibody response demonstrated statistically significant higher T SPOT results compared to those with undetectable antibody levels, with a mean SFC count of 125.70 for group A and 158.73 for group B (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that T cell immunity may persist even when antibodies are undetectable, highlighting the potential role of cellular immunity in providing protection against COVID-19 over time. Additionally, this study demonstrates a significant correlation between humoral and cellular immune response levels to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that the activation of humoral immunity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with higher levels of cellular immunity compared to individuals with undetectable antibody levels.

有无刺突蛋白IgG抗体的covid -19初接种者的SARS-CoV-2 T细胞免疫评价
背景:有效管理疫苗接种计划需要全面了解个人的免疫保护水平,包括接种SARS-CoV-2后体液和细胞水平上免疫反应的相互作用和持久性。本研究旨在探讨在接受SARS-CoV-2疫苗的covid -19初始个体队列中,SARS-CoV-2 T细胞反应水平和持续时间与IgG测量之间的潜在关系。方法:利用从2021年9月至2022年9月在一家私人医疗中心接受COVID-19免疫筛查的连续未感染COVID-19和接种疫苗的成年个体的电子病历中检索的数据进行回顾性描述性分析。使用IGRA方法T- spot®评估T细胞反应。COVID (Oxford immunnote,英国牛津郡阿宾登)。结果:回顾性分析262例个体,其中女性148例(56.5%),男性114例(43.5%),年龄17 ~ 92岁,平均年龄59.47±15.5岁。在参与者中,216/262人(82.4%)检测出SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体阴性(A组),46/262人(17.6%)检测出阳性(B组)。两组接种后时间差异无统计学意义,A组平均接种后时间为136.38±78.68 d, B组平均接种后时间为140.6±79.5 d (t检验,p = 0.74)。a组和B组分别有132/216(61.1%)和39/46(84.8%)出现S抗原T细胞阳性反应(X2检验,p = 0.002)。此外,与抗体水平未检测到的个体相比,抗体反应阳性的个体的T SPOT结果具有统计学意义,a组的平均SFC计数为125.70,B组为158.73 (Mann-Whitney检验,p = 0.006)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,即使抗体无法检测到,T细胞免疫也可能持续存在,这突出了细胞免疫在提供抗COVID-19保护方面的潜在作用。此外,该研究表明,对SARS-CoV-2的体液免疫和细胞免疫应答水平之间存在显著相关性,这表明与抗体水平检测不到的个体相比,接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后体液免疫的激活与更高的细胞免疫水平相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信