Pilot Study: Thread Rhinoplasty With Different Methods of Barbed Thread Implantation.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006807
Takahiko Tamura, Yoshimasa Furuichi, Taichi Tamura, Takashi Fuse, Miku Toma, Kohki Okumura, Hiroo Teranishi
{"title":"Pilot Study: Thread Rhinoplasty With Different Methods of Barbed Thread Implantation.","authors":"Takahiko Tamura, Yoshimasa Furuichi, Taichi Tamura, Takashi Fuse, Miku Toma, Kohki Okumura, Hiroo Teranishi","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thread rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure with short downtime and high patient satisfaction. Although it is known that the effectiveness of rhinoplasty varies depending on the method of thread placement, there have been no studies quantifying these differences. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the effectiveness of rhinoplasty depending on the method of thread implantation using a 3-dimensional imaging analyzer (VECTRA H2, Canfield Scientific).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective observation study. Six patients who underwent rhinoplasty using threads from February to May 2024 were divided into 2 groups according to the method of thread placement: nasal septum implantation group (group S) and nasal septum + nasal dorsum implantation group (group SD). The pre- and postoperative changes analyzed by VECTRAH2 were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nasal dorsal length change, nasal wing length change, and nasal wing length/nasal dorsal length ratio change were not significantly different between the two groups. The angular changes were as follows: nasolabial angle change (15 [8-23], -1 [-7 to 6], <i>P</i> < 0.05), nasal frontal angle change (-3 [-4 to -2], 1.67 [1-3], <i>P</i> < 0.05), nasal face angle change (4 [3-5], 1 [0-2], <i>P</i> < 0.05), and nasal jaw angle change (-4.3 [-5 to -3], -4.3 [-5 to -4], <i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thread rhinoplasty was found to have different postoperative effects depending on the method of thread implantation. It was suggested that it is possible to provide a procedure that meets the patient's wishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thread rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure with short downtime and high patient satisfaction. Although it is known that the effectiveness of rhinoplasty varies depending on the method of thread placement, there have been no studies quantifying these differences. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the effectiveness of rhinoplasty depending on the method of thread implantation using a 3-dimensional imaging analyzer (VECTRA H2, Canfield Scientific).

Methods: This study was a prospective observation study. Six patients who underwent rhinoplasty using threads from February to May 2024 were divided into 2 groups according to the method of thread placement: nasal septum implantation group (group S) and nasal septum + nasal dorsum implantation group (group SD). The pre- and postoperative changes analyzed by VECTRAH2 were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Nasal dorsal length change, nasal wing length change, and nasal wing length/nasal dorsal length ratio change were not significantly different between the two groups. The angular changes were as follows: nasolabial angle change (15 [8-23], -1 [-7 to 6], P < 0.05), nasal frontal angle change (-3 [-4 to -2], 1.67 [1-3], P < 0.05), nasal face angle change (4 [3-5], 1 [0-2], P < 0.05), and nasal jaw angle change (-4.3 [-5 to -3], -4.3 [-5 to -4], P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Thread rhinoplasty was found to have different postoperative effects depending on the method of thread implantation. It was suggested that it is possible to provide a procedure that meets the patient's wishes.

不同刺线植入方法的螺纹鼻成形术的初步研究。
背景:螺纹鼻整形术是一种微创手术,停机时间短,患者满意度高。虽然我们知道鼻整形术的效果取决于螺纹放置的方法,但还没有研究量化这些差异。在本研究中,我们使用三维成像分析仪(VECTRA H2, Canfield Scientific)分析了螺纹植入方法在鼻整形术效果上的差异。方法:本研究为前瞻性观察研究。选择2024年2月~ 5月6例采用螺纹鼻整形术的患者,根据螺纹放置方式分为鼻中隔种植组(S组)和鼻中隔+鼻背种植组(SD组)。采用VECTRAH2分析两组患者术前和术后的变化。结果:两组患者鼻背长变化、鼻翼长变化、鼻翼长/鼻背长比值变化无显著性差异。鼻唇角变化(15 [8-23],-1 [-7 ~ 6],P < 0.05),鼻额角变化(-3 [-4 ~ -2],1.67 [1-3],P < 0.05),鼻面角变化(4 [3-5],1 [0-2],P < 0.05),鼻颌角变化(-4.3 [-5 ~ -3],-4.3 [-5 ~ -4],P < 0.05)。结论:螺纹鼻成形术的术后效果随螺纹植入方式的不同而不同。有人建议,提供一种符合病人意愿的手术是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信