{"title":"Pilot Study: Thread Rhinoplasty With Different Methods of Barbed Thread Implantation.","authors":"Takahiko Tamura, Yoshimasa Furuichi, Taichi Tamura, Takashi Fuse, Miku Toma, Kohki Okumura, Hiroo Teranishi","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thread rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure with short downtime and high patient satisfaction. Although it is known that the effectiveness of rhinoplasty varies depending on the method of thread placement, there have been no studies quantifying these differences. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the effectiveness of rhinoplasty depending on the method of thread implantation using a 3-dimensional imaging analyzer (VECTRA H2, Canfield Scientific).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective observation study. Six patients who underwent rhinoplasty using threads from February to May 2024 were divided into 2 groups according to the method of thread placement: nasal septum implantation group (group S) and nasal septum + nasal dorsum implantation group (group SD). The pre- and postoperative changes analyzed by VECTRAH2 were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nasal dorsal length change, nasal wing length change, and nasal wing length/nasal dorsal length ratio change were not significantly different between the two groups. The angular changes were as follows: nasolabial angle change (15 [8-23], -1 [-7 to 6], <i>P</i> < 0.05), nasal frontal angle change (-3 [-4 to -2], 1.67 [1-3], <i>P</i> < 0.05), nasal face angle change (4 [3-5], 1 [0-2], <i>P</i> < 0.05), and nasal jaw angle change (-4.3 [-5 to -3], -4.3 [-5 to -4], <i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thread rhinoplasty was found to have different postoperative effects depending on the method of thread implantation. It was suggested that it is possible to provide a procedure that meets the patient's wishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 5","pages":"e6807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Thread rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure with short downtime and high patient satisfaction. Although it is known that the effectiveness of rhinoplasty varies depending on the method of thread placement, there have been no studies quantifying these differences. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the effectiveness of rhinoplasty depending on the method of thread implantation using a 3-dimensional imaging analyzer (VECTRA H2, Canfield Scientific).
Methods: This study was a prospective observation study. Six patients who underwent rhinoplasty using threads from February to May 2024 were divided into 2 groups according to the method of thread placement: nasal septum implantation group (group S) and nasal septum + nasal dorsum implantation group (group SD). The pre- and postoperative changes analyzed by VECTRAH2 were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: Nasal dorsal length change, nasal wing length change, and nasal wing length/nasal dorsal length ratio change were not significantly different between the two groups. The angular changes were as follows: nasolabial angle change (15 [8-23], -1 [-7 to 6], P < 0.05), nasal frontal angle change (-3 [-4 to -2], 1.67 [1-3], P < 0.05), nasal face angle change (4 [3-5], 1 [0-2], P < 0.05), and nasal jaw angle change (-4.3 [-5 to -3], -4.3 [-5 to -4], P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Thread rhinoplasty was found to have different postoperative effects depending on the method of thread implantation. It was suggested that it is possible to provide a procedure that meets the patient's wishes.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.