Daniel Soberanes, Mark A Dubbelman, Roos J Jutten, Cassidy P Molinare, Stephanie Hsieh, Hairin Kim, Geoffroy Gagliardi, Patrizia Vannini, Gad A Marshall, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio
{"title":"Updating the self-appraisal of one's cognitive performance with 7 days of repeated exposure: From test-naïve to experienced.","authors":"Daniel Soberanes, Mark A Dubbelman, Roos J Jutten, Cassidy P Molinare, Stephanie Hsieh, Hairin Kim, Geoffroy Gagliardi, Patrizia Vannini, Gad A Marshall, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio","doi":"10.1037/neu0001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-appraisal of cognitive performance, a potentially useful marker of brain functioning, is typically assessed at a single time point where tests are naïve to what constitutes \"good\" or \"bad\" performance. Here, we determine whether familiarizing individuals with self-appraisal with daily memory testing for 7 days provide a more accurate estimate of cognitive functioning and mood.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred twenty-five participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> ± <i>SD</i>: 74.1 ± 8.3 years; 66% female; median education 16.0 years) completed the online Boston Remote Assessment for NeuroCognitive Health, which included two associative memory tasks, for seven consecutive days. Each day, participants self-appraised their performance. At baseline, they completed various cognitive and mood measures. We computed Pearson's correlations between task performance and self-appraisal on Days 1 and 7 and used linear models to examine the relationship between self-appraisal scores and clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracy (Day 1: 0.44 ± 0.12; Day 7: 0.81 ± 0.16) and self-appraisal (Day 1: 0.36 ± 0.15; Day 7: 0.70 ± 0.21) increased, as did the association between accuracy and self-appraisal, Day 1: correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.09, 0.34], <i>p</i> = .001; Day 7: <i>r</i> = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.76], <i>p</i> < .001. Self-appraisal scores on Day 7, but not Day 1, showed significant relationships with in-clinic measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated remote cognitive assessments may help elucidate individuals' capacities to refine their self-perception of cognitive performance during multiday learning. The weak association between accuracy and test-naïve self-appraisal warrants caution about using this metric cross-sectionally. Experienced self-appraisal could be especially relevant at the early stages of neurodegenerative diseases when subtle learning difficulties emerge and could improve our capacity to detect early meta-cognitive changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Self-appraisal of cognitive performance, a potentially useful marker of brain functioning, is typically assessed at a single time point where tests are naïve to what constitutes "good" or "bad" performance. Here, we determine whether familiarizing individuals with self-appraisal with daily memory testing for 7 days provide a more accurate estimate of cognitive functioning and mood.
Method: Two hundred twenty-five participants (Mage ± SD: 74.1 ± 8.3 years; 66% female; median education 16.0 years) completed the online Boston Remote Assessment for NeuroCognitive Health, which included two associative memory tasks, for seven consecutive days. Each day, participants self-appraised their performance. At baseline, they completed various cognitive and mood measures. We computed Pearson's correlations between task performance and self-appraisal on Days 1 and 7 and used linear models to examine the relationship between self-appraisal scores and clinical measures.
Results: Accuracy (Day 1: 0.44 ± 0.12; Day 7: 0.81 ± 0.16) and self-appraisal (Day 1: 0.36 ± 0.15; Day 7: 0.70 ± 0.21) increased, as did the association between accuracy and self-appraisal, Day 1: correlation coefficient (r) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.09, 0.34], p = .001; Day 7: r = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.76], p < .001. Self-appraisal scores on Day 7, but not Day 1, showed significant relationships with in-clinic measures.
Conclusions: Repeated remote cognitive assessments may help elucidate individuals' capacities to refine their self-perception of cognitive performance during multiday learning. The weak association between accuracy and test-naïve self-appraisal warrants caution about using this metric cross-sectionally. Experienced self-appraisal could be especially relevant at the early stages of neurodegenerative diseases when subtle learning difficulties emerge and could improve our capacity to detect early meta-cognitive changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.