Updating the self-appraisal of one's cognitive performance with 7 days of repeated exposure: From test-naïve to experienced.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1037/neu0001010
Daniel Soberanes, Mark A Dubbelman, Roos J Jutten, Cassidy P Molinare, Stephanie Hsieh, Hairin Kim, Geoffroy Gagliardi, Patrizia Vannini, Gad A Marshall, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio
{"title":"Updating the self-appraisal of one's cognitive performance with 7 days of repeated exposure: From test-naïve to experienced.","authors":"Daniel Soberanes, Mark A Dubbelman, Roos J Jutten, Cassidy P Molinare, Stephanie Hsieh, Hairin Kim, Geoffroy Gagliardi, Patrizia Vannini, Gad A Marshall, Kathryn V Papp, Rebecca E Amariglio","doi":"10.1037/neu0001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-appraisal of cognitive performance, a potentially useful marker of brain functioning, is typically assessed at a single time point where tests are naïve to what constitutes \"good\" or \"bad\" performance. Here, we determine whether familiarizing individuals with self-appraisal with daily memory testing for 7 days provide a more accurate estimate of cognitive functioning and mood.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred twenty-five participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> ± <i>SD</i>: 74.1 ± 8.3 years; 66% female; median education 16.0 years) completed the online Boston Remote Assessment for NeuroCognitive Health, which included two associative memory tasks, for seven consecutive days. Each day, participants self-appraised their performance. At baseline, they completed various cognitive and mood measures. We computed Pearson's correlations between task performance and self-appraisal on Days 1 and 7 and used linear models to examine the relationship between self-appraisal scores and clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracy (Day 1: 0.44 ± 0.12; Day 7: 0.81 ± 0.16) and self-appraisal (Day 1: 0.36 ± 0.15; Day 7: 0.70 ± 0.21) increased, as did the association between accuracy and self-appraisal, Day 1: correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.09, 0.34], <i>p</i> = .001; Day 7: <i>r</i> = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.76], <i>p</i> < .001. Self-appraisal scores on Day 7, but not Day 1, showed significant relationships with in-clinic measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated remote cognitive assessments may help elucidate individuals' capacities to refine their self-perception of cognitive performance during multiday learning. The weak association between accuracy and test-naïve self-appraisal warrants caution about using this metric cross-sectionally. Experienced self-appraisal could be especially relevant at the early stages of neurodegenerative diseases when subtle learning difficulties emerge and could improve our capacity to detect early meta-cognitive changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Self-appraisal of cognitive performance, a potentially useful marker of brain functioning, is typically assessed at a single time point where tests are naïve to what constitutes "good" or "bad" performance. Here, we determine whether familiarizing individuals with self-appraisal with daily memory testing for 7 days provide a more accurate estimate of cognitive functioning and mood.

Method: Two hundred twenty-five participants (Mage ± SD: 74.1 ± 8.3 years; 66% female; median education 16.0 years) completed the online Boston Remote Assessment for NeuroCognitive Health, which included two associative memory tasks, for seven consecutive days. Each day, participants self-appraised their performance. At baseline, they completed various cognitive and mood measures. We computed Pearson's correlations between task performance and self-appraisal on Days 1 and 7 and used linear models to examine the relationship between self-appraisal scores and clinical measures.

Results: Accuracy (Day 1: 0.44 ± 0.12; Day 7: 0.81 ± 0.16) and self-appraisal (Day 1: 0.36 ± 0.15; Day 7: 0.70 ± 0.21) increased, as did the association between accuracy and self-appraisal, Day 1: correlation coefficient (r) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.09, 0.34], p = .001; Day 7: r = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.76], p < .001. Self-appraisal scores on Day 7, but not Day 1, showed significant relationships with in-clinic measures.

Conclusions: Repeated remote cognitive assessments may help elucidate individuals' capacities to refine their self-perception of cognitive performance during multiday learning. The weak association between accuracy and test-naïve self-appraisal warrants caution about using this metric cross-sectionally. Experienced self-appraisal could be especially relevant at the early stages of neurodegenerative diseases when subtle learning difficulties emerge and could improve our capacity to detect early meta-cognitive changes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

通过7天的重复暴露更新一个人的认知表现的自我评价:从test-naïve到经验。
目的:认知表现的自我评价是大脑功能的一个潜在有用的标志,通常在一个单一的时间点进行评估,测试是naïve,以确定什么是“好”或“坏”的表现。在这里,我们确定是否熟悉自我评价的个体每天记忆测试7天提供更准确的估计认知功能和情绪。方法:225名受试者(年龄:74.1±8.3岁;66%的女性;(平均受教育程度为16.0年)完成了连续7天的波士顿神经认知健康在线远程评估,其中包括两项联想记忆任务。每天,参与者对自己的表现进行自我评价。在基线时,他们完成了各种认知和情绪测试。我们计算了第1天和第7天任务表现与自我评价之间的Pearson相关性,并使用线性模型来检验自我评价分数与临床测量之间的关系。结果:准确度(第1天:0.44±0.12;第7天:0.81±0.16)和自我评价(第1天:0.36±0.15;第7天:0.70±0.21)增加,准确性与自我评价之间的相关性也增加,第1天:相关系数(r) = 0.22, 95%可信区间(95% CI) [0.09, 0.34], p = .001;第7天:r = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.76], p < 0.001。自我评价得分在第7天,而不是第1天,显示出与临床测量的显著关系。结论:重复的远程认知评估可能有助于阐明个体在多日学习中改善认知表现自我知觉的能力。准确性和test-naïve自我评价之间的弱关联保证了在横截面上使用这个度量的谨慎。在神经退行性疾病的早期阶段,当细微的学习困难出现时,有经验的自我评估可能特别相关,并且可以提高我们发现早期元认知变化的能力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信