Higher contact tackles from upright tacklers increases the risk of head injury removals in elite women's Rugby Union: A case-control study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Ross Tucker, Adam Smith, Ben Hester, Éanna Falvey
{"title":"Higher contact tackles from upright tacklers increases the risk of head injury removals in elite women's Rugby Union: A case-control study.","authors":"Ross Tucker, Adam Smith, Ben Hester, Éanna Falvey","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe tackle characteristics associated with increased risk of Head Injury Assessment (HIA) removals in elite women's Rugby Union.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>145 instances of player removal for head injury assessments with video footage were identified in elite women's rugby. 114 cases occurred during tackles, which were analyzed to describe the influence of foul play, tackle type, tackle height, head contact location, and body position on injury risk. The relative proportion of tackles resulting in head injury removals was compared to the proportion of each tackle characteristic in a control cohort of 1763 tackles that did not result in head injuries to assess risk of each characteristic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Proximity of the tackler's head with the ball carrier's head and shoulder occurred in 72.1 % of HIA1-inducing tackles, compared to 25.0 % of non-HIA1 tackles. Head and shoulder contact was 9.79 (95 % CI 5.95-16.90) times more likely to cause HIA removals than head-to-torso contact and proximity. Upright tackles and active shoulder tackles had increased HIA1 risk for both players. Illegal tackles were 21.42 (95 % CI 11.49-39.93) more likely to cause HIA1s than legal tackles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factors for head injury removals from tackles are similar in women as has been described in men, with higher contact, upright tacklers, dominant tackles and foul play increasing head injury risk. Strategies to lower tackle height and reduce the prevalence of head-to-head and shoulder contact should be explored to reduce head injury incidence in the elite women's game.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2025.03.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe tackle characteristics associated with increased risk of Head Injury Assessment (HIA) removals in elite women's Rugby Union.

Design: Case-control study.

Methods: 145 instances of player removal for head injury assessments with video footage were identified in elite women's rugby. 114 cases occurred during tackles, which were analyzed to describe the influence of foul play, tackle type, tackle height, head contact location, and body position on injury risk. The relative proportion of tackles resulting in head injury removals was compared to the proportion of each tackle characteristic in a control cohort of 1763 tackles that did not result in head injuries to assess risk of each characteristic.

Results: Proximity of the tackler's head with the ball carrier's head and shoulder occurred in 72.1 % of HIA1-inducing tackles, compared to 25.0 % of non-HIA1 tackles. Head and shoulder contact was 9.79 (95 % CI 5.95-16.90) times more likely to cause HIA removals than head-to-torso contact and proximity. Upright tackles and active shoulder tackles had increased HIA1 risk for both players. Illegal tackles were 21.42 (95 % CI 11.49-39.93) more likely to cause HIA1s than legal tackles.

Conclusions: Risk factors for head injury removals from tackles are similar in women as has been described in men, with higher contact, upright tacklers, dominant tackles and foul play increasing head injury risk. Strategies to lower tackle height and reduce the prevalence of head-to-head and shoulder contact should be explored to reduce head injury incidence in the elite women's game.

在精英女子橄榄球联盟中,来自直立铲球者的高接触铲球增加了头部受伤移除的风险:一项病例对照研究。
目的:描述精英女子橄榄球联盟中与头部损伤评估(HIA)移除风险增加相关的铲球特征。设计:病例对照研究。方法:对145例优秀女子橄榄球运动员头部损伤评估录像进行分析。114例发生在铲球过程中,分析了犯规方式、铲球类型、铲球高度、头部接触位置和身体位置对受伤风险的影响。将导致头部受伤的铲球的相对比例与1763次没有导致头部受伤的铲球的每个铲球特征的比例进行比较,以评估每个特征的风险。结果:在导致hia1犯规的铲球中,铲球者的头部与持球者的头部和肩部接近的比例为72.1% %,而在非hia1犯规中,这一比例为25.0% %。头肩接触导致HIA清除的可能性是头躯干接触和接近的9.79倍(95 % CI 5.95-16.90)。直立铲球和主动肩铲球增加了两名球员HIA1的风险。非法铲断导致hia15的概率为21.42(95 % CI 11.49-39.93),高于合法铲断。结论:铲球中头部受伤的危险因素在女性中与男性相似,更高的接触、直立铲球、优势铲球和犯规增加了头部受伤的风险。探讨降低铲球高度、减少头肩接触的策略,以减少女子精英比赛中头部损伤的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信