Effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and provider experience with LB on service utilization, clinical outcomes, and Medicare expenditures among fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2510814
Sarmistha Pal, Michael Beins, Al Dobson, Sung Kim, Seung Kim, Steven Heath, Richa Zirath
{"title":"Effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and provider experience with LB on service utilization, clinical outcomes, and Medicare expenditures among fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries.","authors":"Sarmistha Pal, Michael Beins, Al Dobson, Sung Kim, Seung Kim, Steven Heath, Richa Zirath","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2510814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine (LB) and provider LB use rate for 6 months after discharge on service utilization, clinical outcomes, and Medicare expenditures among Fee for Service (FFS) beneficiaries who have undergone hospital outpatient department (HOPD) procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>100% Medicare Research Identifiable Files data from 2019 to 2023 was utilized. Medicare FFS beneficiaries with the top 100 HOPD surgical procedures where LB was utilized were included in the study and divided into two cohorts: received LB (treatment) and did not receive LB (comparison) during the surgical procedure. An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Propensity Score model was estimated to balance treatment and control groups. We estimated Emergency Department (ED) admission, Short Term Acute Care Hospitals (STACH) admission, mortality, Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and Opioid prescription fill events, and spending metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LB use contributed to significant reductions in ED admission (9%; 23.28 vs. 25.69%), STACH admission (8%; 11.61 vs. 12.65%), mortality (39%; 0.67 vs. 1.1%) and opioid prescription fills (6%; 1.8 vs. 1.92) within 180-days post-discharge. Total Medicare expenditures (180-day episode) were $245 lower for the LB user ($9,645 vs. $9,891). For each 10-percentage point increase in provider LB use-rate, the likelihood of ED admission, STACH admission, mortality, and OUD decreased by 0.1, 0.15, 0.01 and 0.02 percentage points, respectively. Total Medicare expenditures (180-day episode) were reduced by $258 for every one percentage point increase in LB use-rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of LB and provider LB use rate are associated with improved patient clinical, service utilization, and expenditure outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"848-858"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2510814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine (LB) and provider LB use rate for 6 months after discharge on service utilization, clinical outcomes, and Medicare expenditures among Fee for Service (FFS) beneficiaries who have undergone hospital outpatient department (HOPD) procedures.

Methods: 100% Medicare Research Identifiable Files data from 2019 to 2023 was utilized. Medicare FFS beneficiaries with the top 100 HOPD surgical procedures where LB was utilized were included in the study and divided into two cohorts: received LB (treatment) and did not receive LB (comparison) during the surgical procedure. An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Propensity Score model was estimated to balance treatment and control groups. We estimated Emergency Department (ED) admission, Short Term Acute Care Hospitals (STACH) admission, mortality, Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and Opioid prescription fill events, and spending metrics.

Results: LB use contributed to significant reductions in ED admission (9%; 23.28 vs. 25.69%), STACH admission (8%; 11.61 vs. 12.65%), mortality (39%; 0.67 vs. 1.1%) and opioid prescription fills (6%; 1.8 vs. 1.92) within 180-days post-discharge. Total Medicare expenditures (180-day episode) were $245 lower for the LB user ($9,645 vs. $9,891). For each 10-percentage point increase in provider LB use-rate, the likelihood of ED admission, STACH admission, mortality, and OUD decreased by 0.1, 0.15, 0.01 and 0.02 percentage points, respectively. Total Medicare expenditures (180-day episode) were reduced by $258 for every one percentage point increase in LB use-rate.

Conclusion: Use of LB and provider LB use rate are associated with improved patient clinical, service utilization, and expenditure outcomes.

布比卡因脂质体(LB)和提供者使用LB的经验对服务利用、临床结果和服务收费(FFS)受益人医疗保险支出的影响
目的:评估布比卡因脂质体(LB)和出院后6个月提供者LB使用率对接受医院门诊(HOPD)服务收费(FFS)受益人服务利用、临床结局和医疗保险支出的影响。方法:使用2019年至2023年100%的医疗保险研究可识别文件数据。将使用LB的前100例HOPD手术的Medicare FFS受益人纳入研究,并分为两组:在手术过程中接受LB(治疗)和未接受LB(比较)。估计一个反概率治疗加权倾向评分模型来平衡治疗组和对照组。我们估计了急诊科(ED)入院、短期急性护理医院(STACH)入院、死亡率、阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)和阿片类药物处方填充事件以及支出指标。结果:LB的使用显著降低了ED入院率(9%;23.28% vs. 25.69%), STACH入院(8%;11.61% vs. 12.65%),死亡率(39%;0.67% vs. 1.1%)和阿片类药物处方填充物(6%;1.8 vs. 1.92)。LB患者的医疗保险总支出(180天发作)减少245美元(9645美元对9891美元)。提供者LB使用率每增加10个百分点,ED入院、STACH入院、死亡率和OUD的可能性分别降低0.1、0.15、0.01和0.02个百分点。LB使用率每增加一个百分点,医疗保险总支出(180天发作)就减少258美元。结论:LB的使用和提供者LB的使用率与患者临床、服务利用率和支出结果的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信