Introducing the Concept of Error Vectors to Improve Source Localization Results of Epileptic Discharges.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kanjana Unnwongse, Carsten H Wolters, Tim Wehner, Lia Theophilo Krüger, Stefan Rampp, Jörg Wellmer
{"title":"Introducing the Concept of Error Vectors to Improve Source Localization Results of Epileptic Discharges.","authors":"Kanjana Unnwongse, Carsten H Wolters, Tim Wehner, Lia Theophilo Krüger, Stefan Rampp, Jörg Wellmer","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To improve EEG source localization results of interictal epileptic discharges (IED) by applying postprocessing step to electrical source imaging (ESI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Localization error of ESI was evaluated in comparison to known sources of stimulation potentials (ESP) by recording simultaneous stereo-EEG/scalp EEG. Error vectors were defined as the offset of the ESI-dipole of ESP to the stereo-EEG contacts used for stimulation. The inverted error vector was applied to the ESI-dipole of IED (IED-dipole).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven IED clusters were evaluated. Corrected IED-dipoles were located closer to IED-onset contacts on stereo-EEG than uncorrected IED-dipoles (median [IQR]: 7.8 [2.5] versus 18.7 [10.7] mm, P = 0.02). Anatomically, for high skull conductivities, all corrected IED-dipoles were located in cortical structures or adjacent to epileptogenic lesion, whereas uncorrected IED-dipoles were located in white matter or CSF (P = 0.02). Physiologically, cortical extent of IED generators estimated from corrected IED-dipoles was 16.5 cm2 (IQR = 10.4 cm2) and 7.4 cm2 (range 5.8-9.2 cm2) in the group of anterior temporal IED and prefrontal IED, respectively; the former was concordant with the extent estimated by subdural electrodes. In addition, the relationship of stereo-EEG IED amplitude (a) drop with increasing distance (d) from corrected IED-dipole could be modeled as a negative power equation a(d)∝1/db (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.01), with b ranging from 0.79 to 2.3, median: 1.57, consistent with a simulation model of the sensitivity of intracerebral electrode.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of inverted error vector reduces localization error and shifts IED-dipole to an anatomically and physiologically plausible location.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To improve EEG source localization results of interictal epileptic discharges (IED) by applying postprocessing step to electrical source imaging (ESI).

Methods: Localization error of ESI was evaluated in comparison to known sources of stimulation potentials (ESP) by recording simultaneous stereo-EEG/scalp EEG. Error vectors were defined as the offset of the ESI-dipole of ESP to the stereo-EEG contacts used for stimulation. The inverted error vector was applied to the ESI-dipole of IED (IED-dipole).

Results: Seven IED clusters were evaluated. Corrected IED-dipoles were located closer to IED-onset contacts on stereo-EEG than uncorrected IED-dipoles (median [IQR]: 7.8 [2.5] versus 18.7 [10.7] mm, P = 0.02). Anatomically, for high skull conductivities, all corrected IED-dipoles were located in cortical structures or adjacent to epileptogenic lesion, whereas uncorrected IED-dipoles were located in white matter or CSF (P = 0.02). Physiologically, cortical extent of IED generators estimated from corrected IED-dipoles was 16.5 cm2 (IQR = 10.4 cm2) and 7.4 cm2 (range 5.8-9.2 cm2) in the group of anterior temporal IED and prefrontal IED, respectively; the former was concordant with the extent estimated by subdural electrodes. In addition, the relationship of stereo-EEG IED amplitude (a) drop with increasing distance (d) from corrected IED-dipole could be modeled as a negative power equation a(d)∝1/db (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.01), with b ranging from 0.79 to 2.3, median: 1.57, consistent with a simulation model of the sensitivity of intracerebral electrode.

Conclusions: Application of inverted error vector reduces localization error and shifts IED-dipole to an anatomically and physiologically plausible location.

引入误差向量的概念改进癫痫放电源定位结果。
目的:通过对电源成像(ESI)进行后处理,提高癫痫发作间期放电(IED)的脑电源定位结果。方法:采用立体脑电/头皮脑电同步记录的方法,比较ESI与已知刺激电位源(ESP)的定位误差。误差向量定义为ESP的esi偶极子与用于刺激的立体脑电触点的偏移量。将反向误差矢量应用于IED的esi偶极子(IED-dipole)。结果:对7组IED进行了评价。校正后的ied偶极子比未校正的ied偶极子位于更靠近ied发生接触点的位置(中位数[IQR]: 7.8[2.5]比18.7 [10.7]mm, P = 0.02)。解剖学上,对于高颅骨电导率,所有校正的ied偶极子位于皮质结构或癫痫性病变附近,而未校正的ied偶极子位于白质或脑脊液(P = 0.02)。生理上,经校正的IED偶极子估计的IED产生器的皮质面积在颞叶前部IED组和前额叶前部IED组分别为16.5 cm2 (IQR = 10.4 cm2)和7.4 cm2(范围5.8-9.2 cm2);前者与硬膜下电极估计的程度一致。此外,立体脑电IED振幅(a)下降随校正IED偶极子距离(d)增加的关系可建模为负幂方程a(d)∝1/db (R2 = 0.87, P < 0.01),其中b的取值范围为0.79 ~ 2.3,中位数为1.57,与脑内电极灵敏度模拟模型一致。结论:反向误差矢量的应用减少了定位误差,并将ied偶极子移动到解剖学和生理学上合理的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信