Long-term outcomes of endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for ruptured arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Yu Chen, Chengzhuo Wang, Heze Han, Li Ma, Ruinan Li, Zhipeng Li, Haibin Zhang, Kexin Yuan, Anqi Li, Qinghui Zhu, Yongenbo Su, Dezhi Gao, Hengwei Jin, Youxiang Li, Shibin Sun, Yuanli Zhao, Xiaolin Chen, Jizong Zhao
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for ruptured arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data.","authors":"Yu Chen, Chengzhuo Wang, Heze Han, Li Ma, Ruinan Li, Zhipeng Li, Haibin Zhang, Kexin Yuan, Anqi Li, Qinghui Zhu, Yongenbo Su, Dezhi Gao, Hengwei Jin, Youxiang Li, Shibin Sun, Yuanli Zhao, Xiaolin Chen, Jizong Zhao","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the risk-benefit profiles of endovascular embolization (EM) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as first-line therapeutic strategies for the management of ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included patients with ruptured AVMs who underwent EM or SRS as the first-line treatments from a nationwide prospective multicenter registry (the *BLINDED* study) in China. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics between the EM and SRS groups. The primary outcomes were long-term hemorrhagic stroke or death, while secondary outcomes included long-term obliteration rates and neurological status. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses using alternative study designs were conducted to ensure the robustness and consistency of the findings.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of 3909 consecutive AVMs in the registry from 2011.08 to 2021.12, 1067 patients were eligible. After matching, 640 AVMs remained for the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 5.27 years. In terms of primary outcomes, SRS was associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58). Regarding the secondary outcomes, SRS was observed to have a significant advantage in long-term obliteration (odds ratio [OR] 7.89, 95%CI 5.15 to 12.11), and the incidence was significantly lower in the SRS group than in the EM group for the disabling neurological deficits (OR, 0.42, 95%CI, 0.25 to 0.70). Results of subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were consistent in trend but with slightly varied powers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that SRS may more effective than EM in preventing future hemorrhagic stroke or death, achieving complete obliteration, and reducing long-term neurological disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the risk-benefit profiles of endovascular embolization (EM) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as first-line therapeutic strategies for the management of ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

Materials and methods: We included patients with ruptured AVMs who underwent EM or SRS as the first-line treatments from a nationwide prospective multicenter registry (the *BLINDED* study) in China. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics between the EM and SRS groups. The primary outcomes were long-term hemorrhagic stroke or death, while secondary outcomes included long-term obliteration rates and neurological status. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses using alternative study designs were conducted to ensure the robustness and consistency of the findings.

Result: Of 3909 consecutive AVMs in the registry from 2011.08 to 2021.12, 1067 patients were eligible. After matching, 640 AVMs remained for the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 5.27 years. In terms of primary outcomes, SRS was associated with a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58). Regarding the secondary outcomes, SRS was observed to have a significant advantage in long-term obliteration (odds ratio [OR] 7.89, 95%CI 5.15 to 12.11), and the incidence was significantly lower in the SRS group than in the EM group for the disabling neurological deficits (OR, 0.42, 95%CI, 0.25 to 0.70). Results of subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were consistent in trend but with slightly varied powers.

Conclusion: This study suggests that SRS may more effective than EM in preventing future hemorrhagic stroke or death, achieving complete obliteration, and reducing long-term neurological disability.

血管内栓塞和立体定向放射手术作为破裂动静脉畸形的一线治疗的长期结果:使用全国多中心前瞻性注册数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:本研究旨在评估和比较血管内栓塞(EM)和立体定向放射手术(SRS)作为治疗破裂动静脉畸形(AVMs)的一线治疗策略的风险-收益概况。材料和方法:我们纳入了来自中国全国前瞻性多中心注册(* blind *研究)的avm破裂患者,他们接受了EM或SRS作为一线治疗。倾向评分匹配用于平衡EM组和SRS组之间的基线特征。主要结局是长期出血性中风或死亡,而次要结局包括长期脑闭塞率和神经状态。采用替代研究设计进行亚组分析和敏感性分析,以确保研究结果的稳健性和一致性。结果:在2011年8月至2021.12年登记的3909例连续avm中,1067例患者符合条件。匹配后,剩下640个avm供最终分析。平均随访时间为5.27年。在主要结局方面,SRS与出血性卒中或死亡风险降低相关(风险比[HR] 0.36, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.23至0.58)。关于次要结果,SRS在长期闭塞方面具有显著优势(优势比[OR] 7.89, 95%CI 5.15至12.11),并且SRS组致残性神经功能缺陷的发生率显著低于EM组(优势比,0.42,95%CI, 0.25至0.70)。亚组分析和敏感性分析的结果趋势一致,但功率略有不同。结论:本研究提示SRS可能比EM更有效地预防未来出血性卒中或死亡,实现完全闭塞,减少长期神经功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信