Impact of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Serum C-Reactive Protein Level to Overall Survival After Second-Line Targeted Therapy Following Immuno-Oncology Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Keita Nakane, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Taku Naiki, Kiyoshi Takahara, Teruo Inamoto, Takahiro Yasui, Ryoichi Shiroki, Hideaki Miyake, Takuya Koie
{"title":"Impact of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Serum C-Reactive Protein Level to Overall Survival After Second-Line Targeted Therapy Following Immuno-Oncology Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Keita Nakane, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Taku Naiki, Kiyoshi Takahara, Teruo Inamoto, Takahiro Yasui, Ryoichi Shiroki, Hideaki Miyake, Takuya Koie","doi":"10.1111/iju.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies are first-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, second-line treatment efficacy remains uncertain due to limited large randomized trials. This study evaluated real-world oncological outcomes after second-line treatments in patients who received combination ICIs as first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 467 patients who received ICI combination therapy as first-line treatment for mRCC between January 2018 and January 2024, those who received cabozantinib (Cabo) or axitinib (Axi) as second-line treatment were included in this study. The patient characteristics at the initiation of second-line treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Prognostic factors associated with OS after the initiation of second-line treatment were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cabo and Axi groups included 87 and 45 patients, respectively. Median OS and PFS after the initiation of secondary treatment were 32 and 9 months in the Cabo group (p = 0.269), and 33 and 12 months in the Axi group (p = 0.399). Multivariable analysis identified serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> at the start of secondary treatment as independent predictors of OS. Stratification by these factors revealed a significant OS difference (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oncological outcomes after the initiation of secondary treatment did not differ significantly between the Cabo and Axi groups. An eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and CRP ≥ 0.6 mg/dL at the start of Cabo or Axi treatment were independent OS predictors after secondary treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies are first-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, second-line treatment efficacy remains uncertain due to limited large randomized trials. This study evaluated real-world oncological outcomes after second-line treatments in patients who received combination ICIs as first-line treatment.

Methods: Among 467 patients who received ICI combination therapy as first-line treatment for mRCC between January 2018 and January 2024, those who received cabozantinib (Cabo) or axitinib (Axi) as second-line treatment were included in this study. The patient characteristics at the initiation of second-line treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Prognostic factors associated with OS after the initiation of second-line treatment were evaluated.

Results: The Cabo and Axi groups included 87 and 45 patients, respectively. Median OS and PFS after the initiation of secondary treatment were 32 and 9 months in the Cabo group (p = 0.269), and 33 and 12 months in the Axi group (p = 0.399). Multivariable analysis identified serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the start of secondary treatment as independent predictors of OS. Stratification by these factors revealed a significant OS difference (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Oncological outcomes after the initiation of secondary treatment did not differ significantly between the Cabo and Axi groups. An eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and CRP ≥ 0.6 mg/dL at the start of Cabo or Axi treatment were independent OS predictors after secondary treatment.

估计肾小球滤过率和血清c反应蛋白水平对晚期肾癌免疫肿瘤联合治疗后二线靶向治疗总生存率的影响
目的:基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合治疗是局部晚期或转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线治疗方法。然而,由于有限的大型随机试验,二线治疗的疗效仍然不确定。该研究评估了接受联合ICIs作为一线治疗的患者在接受二线治疗后的真实肿瘤预后。方法:在2018年1月至2024年1月期间接受ICI联合治疗作为mRCC一线治疗的467例患者中,接受卡博赞替尼(Cabo)或阿西替尼(Axi)作为二线治疗的患者纳入本研究。比较两组患者在二线治疗开始时的特征、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。评估开始二线治疗后与OS相关的预后因素。结果:Cabo组87例,Axi组45例。Cabo组开始二次治疗后的中位OS和PFS分别为32和9个月(p = 0.269), Axi组为33和12个月(p = 0.399)。多变量分析发现,在二次治疗开始时血清c反应蛋白(CRP)≥0.6 mg/dL和估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR) 2是OS的独立预测因素。这些因素的分层显示了显著的OS差异(p)。结论:Cabo组和Axi组开始二次治疗后的肿瘤预后无显著差异。Cabo或Axi治疗开始时eGFR 2和CRP≥0.6 mg/dL是二次治疗后OS的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信