Preoperative weight loss for open abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y
Daphne Remulla, Kimberly S Miles, Alvaro Carvalho, Sara M Maskal, W Scott Butsch, Lucas R Beffa, Clayton C Petro, David M Krpata, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen, Benjamin T Miller
{"title":"Preoperative weight loss for open abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Daphne Remulla, Kimberly S Miles, Alvaro Carvalho, Sara M Maskal, W Scott Butsch, Lucas R Beffa, Clayton C Petro, David M Krpata, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen, Benjamin T Miller","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is widely recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes following ventral hernia repair. This belief has led many surgeons to implement arbitrary body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, typically 35-40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, before offering elective hernia repair. These practices are based on low-quality evidence and create significant challenges for patients with symptomatic hernias who lack access to metabolic and bariatric surgery or obesity medications. We aim to compare medical weight loss followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with severe obesity undergoing ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a registry-based, parallel, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A total of 258 patients with a BMI 40-55 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who are planning to undergo open retromuscular ventral hernia repair are randomized to a six-month preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery or upfront surgery. The medical weight loss program is conducted by a nurse practitioner trained in obesity medicine. The primary hypothesis is that abdominal wall-specific quality of life, as measured by Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at one year, for the upfront abdominal wall reconstruction intervention will be non-inferior compared to a preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery. Secondary outcomes include hernia recurrence rates at one-year, wound morbidity at 30 days and one year, and rates of emergency hernia repair, readmissions, complications, and reoperations between groups. Patient-reported outcomes include quality of life and pain scores at baseline, 30 days, and after completing the standard medical weight loss program. Weight-related outcomes include changes in weight from enrollment through one-year follow-up, rate of achievement of weight loss goals, and the association of weight loss and program completion on postoperative outcomes. Lastly, we will evaluate cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative weight loss offers potential benefits for patients with obesity undergoing hernia repair including decreased wound morbidity, reduced technical difficulty, and potentially lower recurrence rates. However, disadvantages include prolonged diminished quality of life, risk of emergent hernia repair during the weight loss period, limited access to effective weight loss interventions, and challenges with adherence to weight loss protocols and long-term weight maintenance. This randomized controlled trial will provide high-quality evidence on whether intensive preoperative medical weight loss improves outcomes compared to immediate surgical repair in patients with severe obesity, helping to establish evidence-based guidelines for this challenging patient population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05925959 (registered June 22, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03375-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is widely recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes following ventral hernia repair. This belief has led many surgeons to implement arbitrary body mass index (BMI) cutoffs, typically 35-40 kg/m2, before offering elective hernia repair. These practices are based on low-quality evidence and create significant challenges for patients with symptomatic hernias who lack access to metabolic and bariatric surgery or obesity medications. We aim to compare medical weight loss followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with severe obesity undergoing ventral hernia repair.

Methods: This is a registry-based, parallel, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. A total of 258 patients with a BMI 40-55 kg/m2 who are planning to undergo open retromuscular ventral hernia repair are randomized to a six-month preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery or upfront surgery. The medical weight loss program is conducted by a nurse practitioner trained in obesity medicine. The primary hypothesis is that abdominal wall-specific quality of life, as measured by Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) summary scores at one year, for the upfront abdominal wall reconstruction intervention will be non-inferior compared to a preoperative medical weight loss program followed by surgery. Secondary outcomes include hernia recurrence rates at one-year, wound morbidity at 30 days and one year, and rates of emergency hernia repair, readmissions, complications, and reoperations between groups. Patient-reported outcomes include quality of life and pain scores at baseline, 30 days, and after completing the standard medical weight loss program. Weight-related outcomes include changes in weight from enrollment through one-year follow-up, rate of achievement of weight loss goals, and the association of weight loss and program completion on postoperative outcomes. Lastly, we will evaluate cost-effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Discussion: Preoperative weight loss offers potential benefits for patients with obesity undergoing hernia repair including decreased wound morbidity, reduced technical difficulty, and potentially lower recurrence rates. However, disadvantages include prolonged diminished quality of life, risk of emergent hernia repair during the weight loss period, limited access to effective weight loss interventions, and challenges with adherence to weight loss protocols and long-term weight maintenance. This randomized controlled trial will provide high-quality evidence on whether intensive preoperative medical weight loss improves outcomes compared to immediate surgical repair in patients with severe obesity, helping to establish evidence-based guidelines for this challenging patient population.

Trial registration: NCT05925959 (registered June 22, 2023).

开放式腹壁重建术前减重:随机对照试验的研究方案。
背景:肥胖被广泛认为是腹疝修补术后不良预后的危险因素。这种信念导致许多外科医生在提供选择性疝气修补之前,采用任意的体重指数(BMI)临界值,通常为35-40 kg/m2。这些做法基于低质量的证据,对缺乏代谢和减肥手术或肥胖药物的症状性疝气患者构成重大挑战。我们的目的是比较内科减肥后手术与术前手术对重度肥胖患者腹疝修补术的影响。方法:这是一项基于注册的、平行的、1:1分配的随机对照试验。258名BMI 40-55 kg/m2计划行开放式肌肉后腹疝修补术的患者被随机分为六个月的术前药物减肥计划,随后进行手术或术前手术。医疗减肥计划由接受过肥胖医学培训的执业护士执行。主要假设是腹壁特异性生活质量,通过疝相关生活质量调查(HerQLes)在一年的总结得分来衡量,与术前手术后的药物减肥计划相比,术前腹壁重建干预的腹壁特异性生活质量并不差。次要结局包括1年疝复发率,30天和1年的伤口发病率,以及两组间急诊疝修补、再入院、并发症和再手术的发生率。患者报告的结果包括基线、30天和完成标准医疗减肥计划后的生活质量和疼痛评分。体重相关的结局包括从入组到1年随访期间的体重变化、减肥目标的达成率、减肥与术后结局的计划完成率的关系。最后,我们将使用质量调整寿命年和增量成本效益比来评估成本效益。讨论:术前体重减轻为接受疝修补术的肥胖患者提供了潜在的好处,包括减少伤口发病率、降低技术难度和潜在的低复发率。然而,缺点包括生活质量的长期下降,在减肥期间有紧急疝气修复的风险,获得有效减肥干预的机会有限,以及坚持减肥方案和长期体重维持的挑战。这项随机对照试验将提供高质量的证据,证明术前强化药物减肥与立即手术修复相比是否能改善严重肥胖患者的预后,有助于为这一具有挑战性的患者群体建立循证指南。试验注册:NCT05925959(2023年6月22日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信