Long-term non-conditional and conditional metastasis of uveal melanoma by tumor size category in 8034 patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2453_24
Rolika Bansal, Hidayet Sener, Jerry A Shields, Carol L Shields
{"title":"Long-term non-conditional and conditional metastasis of uveal melanoma by tumor size category in 8034 patients.","authors":"Rolika Bansal, Hidayet Sener, Jerry A Shields, Carol L Shields","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2453_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate metastasis of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) based on tumor size categories classified by ultrasonographic thickness as small (0.0-3.0 mm), medium (3.1-8.0 mm), or large (≥8.1 mm) using both non-conditional and conditional analyses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 8034 cases over 35-years at a single ocular oncology referral center evaluated the primary endpoint of cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25- and 30-years using non-conditional and conditional analysis at 3-years, 5-years, and 10-years of metastasis-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean thicknesses for small, medium, and large UMs were 2.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 10.2 mm, respectively. Based on tumor size category (small vs. medium vs. large), the 25-year non-conditional metastasis was 5% vs. 12% vs. 21%, and for those with 3-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 7% vs. 13% vs. 26%. For those with 5-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 6% vs. 11% vs. 21%. For those with 10-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 4% vs. 8% vs. 21%. For small vs. medium UM, by conditional analysis, those who maintained 3-year/5-year/10-year metastasis-free survival, hazard ratio was 1.50 (P <0.01)/1.53 (P <0.01)/1.77 (P = 0.01), and for medium vs. large UM, hazard ratio was 1.45 (P <0.01)/1.44 (P = 0.03)/1.96 (P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term comparative analysis of UM metastasis, based on tumor size category (thickness) as small, medium, or large, revealed that large UM is more likely with higher tendency to develop metastasis over time. The patients achieving 3-, 5-, and 10-year metastasis-free survival demonstrated significantly reduced subsequent risk of metastasis across all tumor size categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 6","pages":"893-899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2453_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate metastasis of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) based on tumor size categories classified by ultrasonographic thickness as small (0.0-3.0 mm), medium (3.1-8.0 mm), or large (≥8.1 mm) using both non-conditional and conditional analyses.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Methods: A retrospective study of 8034 cases over 35-years at a single ocular oncology referral center evaluated the primary endpoint of cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25- and 30-years using non-conditional and conditional analysis at 3-years, 5-years, and 10-years of metastasis-free survival.

Results: The mean thicknesses for small, medium, and large UMs were 2.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 10.2 mm, respectively. Based on tumor size category (small vs. medium vs. large), the 25-year non-conditional metastasis was 5% vs. 12% vs. 21%, and for those with 3-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 7% vs. 13% vs. 26%. For those with 5-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 6% vs. 11% vs. 21%. For those with 10-year metastasis-free survival, the 25-year incidence of metastasis was 4% vs. 8% vs. 21%. For small vs. medium UM, by conditional analysis, those who maintained 3-year/5-year/10-year metastasis-free survival, hazard ratio was 1.50 (P <0.01)/1.53 (P <0.01)/1.77 (P = 0.01), and for medium vs. large UM, hazard ratio was 1.45 (P <0.01)/1.44 (P = 0.03)/1.96 (P = 0.06).

Conclusion: Long-term comparative analysis of UM metastasis, based on tumor size category (thickness) as small, medium, or large, revealed that large UM is more likely with higher tendency to develop metastasis over time. The patients achieving 3-, 5-, and 10-year metastasis-free survival demonstrated significantly reduced subsequent risk of metastasis across all tumor size categories.

8034例葡萄膜黑色素瘤长期非条件和条件转移的肿瘤大小分类。
目的:通过非条件和条件分析,根据超声图像厚度将肿瘤大小分为小(0.0-3.0 mm)、中(3.1-8.0 mm)和大(≥8.1 mm),评估葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)患者的转移情况。设计:回顾性分析。方法:对一家眼科肿瘤转诊中心35年来8034例患者进行回顾性研究,通过3年、5年和10年无转移生存期的非条件分析和条件分析,评估5年、10年、15年、20年、25年和30年累积转移发生率的主要终点。结果:小、中、大的平均厚度分别为2.5 mm、5.0 mm、10.2 mm。根据肿瘤大小类别(小、中、大),25年非条件转移率分别为5%、12%、21%,无转移生存率为3年的患者,25年转移率分别为7%、13%、26%。对于5年无转移生存率的患者,25年转移发生率分别为6%、11%和21%。对于10年无转移生存期的患者,25年转移发生率分别为4%、8%和21%。通过条件分析,对于小UM和中等UM,维持3年/5年/10年无转移生存的患者,风险比为1.50 (P)。结论:基于肿瘤大小类别(厚度)为小、中、大的UM转移的长期比较分析显示,随着时间的推移,大UM更有可能发生转移。达到3年、5年和10年无转移生存期的患者在所有肿瘤大小类别中均显著降低了随后的转移风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信