Evaluating anti-VEGF responses in diabetic macular edema: A systematic review with AI-powered treatment insights.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_1810_24
S Tamilselvi, M Suchetha, Dhanashree Ratra, Janani Surya, S Preethi, Rajiv Raman
{"title":"Evaluating anti-VEGF responses in diabetic macular edema: A systematic review with AI-powered treatment insights.","authors":"S Tamilselvi, M Suchetha, Dhanashree Ratra, Janani Surya, S Preethi, Rajiv Raman","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1810_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in deep learning and machine learning have greatly increased the capabilities of extracting features for evaluating the response to anti VEGF treatment in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). In this review, we explore how these algorithms can be used for discriminating between responders and non-responders to anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Electronic databases, including PubMed, IEEE Xplore, BioMed, JAMA, and Google Scholar, were searched, and reference lists from relevant publications were also considered from inception till August 31, 2023, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results focus on keywords such as DME, OCT, anti VEGF, and patient responses after anti VEGF injections. The article measures the effectiveness of different machine learning and deep learning algorithms, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), ResNet-50, CNN with attention, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM), in analyzing eyes that could tolerate extended interval dosing. According to a review of 50 relevant papers published between 2016 and 2023, the algorithms achieved an average automated sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 0.55-0.92) in detecting treatment responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 6","pages":"797-806"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1810_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning and machine learning have greatly increased the capabilities of extracting features for evaluating the response to anti VEGF treatment in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). In this review, we explore how these algorithms can be used for discriminating between responders and non-responders to anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Electronic databases, including PubMed, IEEE Xplore, BioMed, JAMA, and Google Scholar, were searched, and reference lists from relevant publications were also considered from inception till August 31, 2023, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The results focus on keywords such as DME, OCT, anti VEGF, and patient responses after anti VEGF injections. The article measures the effectiveness of different machine learning and deep learning algorithms, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), ResNet-50, CNN with attention, quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM), in analyzing eyes that could tolerate extended interval dosing. According to a review of 50 relevant papers published between 2016 and 2023, the algorithms achieved an average automated sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 0.55-0.92) in detecting treatment responses.

评估糖尿病黄斑水肿的抗vegf反应:人工智能治疗见解的系统综述
深度学习和机器学习的最新进展大大提高了提取特征以评估糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者抗VEGF治疗反应的能力。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了这些算法如何用于区分抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射的应答者和无应答者。检索PubMed、IEEE Xplore、BioMed、JAMA、b谷歌Scholar等电子数据库,并根据纳入和排除标准,检索自论文成立至2023年8月31日期间相关出版物的参考文献列表。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行数据提取。结果重点关注DME、OCT、anti - VEGF等关键词,以及患者注射抗VEGF后的反应。本文测量了不同的机器学习和深度学习算法的有效性,包括线性判别分析(LDA)、ResNet-50、CNN with attention、二次判别分析(QDA)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM),以分析可以忍受延长间隔剂量的眼睛。根据对2016年至2023年间发表的50篇相关论文的回顾,这些算法在检测治疗反应方面的平均自动灵敏度为74% (95% CI: 0.55-0.92)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信