Effect of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on the development of gingival recession. A prospective controlled study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dimitrios Kloukos, George Koukos, Nikolaos Pandis, Ioannis Doulis, Andreas Stavropoulos, Christos Katsaros
{"title":"Effect of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on the development of gingival recession. A prospective controlled study.","authors":"Dimitrios Kloukos, George Koukos, Nikolaos Pandis, Ioannis Doulis, Andreas Stavropoulos, Christos Katsaros","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess in a prospective controlled study whether orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances results in development of gingival recession (GR), compared with an untreated group of participants.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 40 consecutive adult orthodontic patients (Intervention group) and 40 untreated adult volunteers, that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were selected from the same background population, as the control group. GR was measured as part of a full periodontal assessment: before treatment (T0) and 12 months after removal of the fixed appliances (T1) in the intervention group, i.e. at about 30 months from T0, and at baseline (T0) and 30 months after (T1) in the control group. A count data model was fit using the sum of recessions at T1 and as predictors: treatment, periodontal phenotype (thin/thick), side (buccal/lingual), sex, age, and number of recessions at baseline, with robust standard errors to account for the multiple within patient observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen females and 21 males in each group [mean age in years (range): intervention group 23.1 (16.8 - 43.3); control: 21.85 (18.2 - 43.9)] were analyzed. During the whole study period, the control group exhibited a modest increase in the number of recessions over time. Several patients in the intervention group exhibited a larger increase in the number of recessions than the controls. However, this was partly counteracted by a considerable amount of reduction in the number of recessions in several patients receiving treatment. The adjusted incidence for recession was 67% higher for the intervention group versus the control group (IRR = 1.67, 95% CIs: 1.05, 2.67, P = 0.03). Most recessions, though, were up to 1mm. The most affected teeth were the canines and the first premolars.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to untreated individuals, patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances showed a higher incidence rate of gingival recession at 1-year posttreatment, adjusted for age, periodontal phenotype, side, gender and number of recessions at baseline. However, the severity of gingival recessions was of limited extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess in a prospective controlled study whether orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances results in development of gingival recession (GR), compared with an untreated group of participants.

Materials & methods: The sample consisted of 40 consecutive adult orthodontic patients (Intervention group) and 40 untreated adult volunteers, that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were selected from the same background population, as the control group. GR was measured as part of a full periodontal assessment: before treatment (T0) and 12 months after removal of the fixed appliances (T1) in the intervention group, i.e. at about 30 months from T0, and at baseline (T0) and 30 months after (T1) in the control group. A count data model was fit using the sum of recessions at T1 and as predictors: treatment, periodontal phenotype (thin/thick), side (buccal/lingual), sex, age, and number of recessions at baseline, with robust standard errors to account for the multiple within patient observations.

Results: Nineteen females and 21 males in each group [mean age in years (range): intervention group 23.1 (16.8 - 43.3); control: 21.85 (18.2 - 43.9)] were analyzed. During the whole study period, the control group exhibited a modest increase in the number of recessions over time. Several patients in the intervention group exhibited a larger increase in the number of recessions than the controls. However, this was partly counteracted by a considerable amount of reduction in the number of recessions in several patients receiving treatment. The adjusted incidence for recession was 67% higher for the intervention group versus the control group (IRR = 1.67, 95% CIs: 1.05, 2.67, P = 0.03). Most recessions, though, were up to 1mm. The most affected teeth were the canines and the first premolars.

Conclusions: Compared to untreated individuals, patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances showed a higher incidence rate of gingival recession at 1-year posttreatment, adjusted for age, periodontal phenotype, side, gender and number of recessions at baseline. However, the severity of gingival recessions was of limited extent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

固定矫治器正畸治疗对牙龈萎缩发展的影响。一项前瞻性对照研究。
目的:在一项前瞻性对照研究中,与未治疗组相比,使用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗是否会导致牙龈萎缩(GR)的发生。材料与方法:样本包括40例符合纳入和排除标准的连续成人正畸患者(干预组)和40例未经治疗的成人志愿者,均选自相同背景的人群作为对照组。GR作为全面牙周评估的一部分进行测量:干预组在治疗前(T0)和移除固定矫治器后12个月(T1),即从T0开始约30个月,对照组在基线(T0)和30个月后(T1)。使用T1时衰退的总和拟合计数数据模型,并作为预测因子:治疗、牙周表型(薄/厚)、侧面(颊/舌)、性别、年龄和基线时衰退的数量,具有稳健的标准误差,以解释患者观察中的多重。结果:两组女性19例,男性21例[平均年龄(范围):干预组23.1岁(16.8 ~ 43.3岁);对照组:21.85例(18.2 ~ 43.9例)。在整个研究期间,随着时间的推移,对照组的经济衰退次数略有增加。干预组的几名患者表现出比对照组更大的衰退次数增加。然而,在接受治疗的几名患者中,衰退数量的显著减少部分抵消了这一影响。干预组的衰退调整发生率比对照组高67% (IRR = 1.67, 95% ci: 1.05, 2.67, P = 0.03)。然而,大多数衰退都达到了1毫米。受影响最严重的牙齿是犬齿和第一前磨牙。结论:与未经治疗的个体相比,使用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗的患者在治疗后1年的牙龈萎缩发生率更高,调整了年龄、牙周表型、侧边、性别和基线时牙龈萎缩次数。然而,牙龈衰退的严重程度是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信