Prediction and Stage Classification of Pressure Ulcers in Intensive Care Patients by Machine Learning.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mürsel Kahveci, Levent Uğur
{"title":"Prediction and Stage Classification of Pressure Ulcers in Intensive Care Patients by Machine Learning.","authors":"Mürsel Kahveci, Levent Uğur","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15101239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Pressure ulcers are a serious clinical problem associated with high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Existing risk assessment tools, such as the Braden Score, are often inadequate in ICU patients and have poor discriminatory power between classes. This increases the need for more sensitive, predictive and integrative systems. The aim of this study was to classify pressure ulcer stages (Stages I-IV) with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms using demographic, clinical and laboratory data of ICU patients and to evaluate the model performance at a level that can be integrated into clinical decision support systems. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 200 patients hospitalized in the ICU were included in the study. Using demographic, clinical and laboratory data of the patients, six different machine learning algorithms (SVM, KNN, ANN, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes and Discriminant Analysis) were used for classification. The models were evaluated using confusion matrices, ROC-AUC analyses and metrics such as class-based sensitivity and error rate. <b>Results:</b> SVM, KNN and ANN models showed the highest success in classifying pressure ulcer stages, achieving 99% overall accuracy and excellent performance with AUC = 1.00. Variables such as Braden score, albumin and CRP levels contributed significantly to model performance. ROC curves showed that the models provided strong discrimination between classes. Key predictors of pressure ulcer severity included prolonged ICU stay (<i>p</i> < 0.001), low albumin (Stage I: 3.4 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. Stage IV: 2.4 ± 0.8 g/dL; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high CRP (Stage I: 28 mg/L vs. Stage IV: 142 mg/L; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study shows that machine learning algorithms offer high accuracy and generalization potential in pressure ulcer classification. In particular, the effectiveness of algorithms such as SVM, ANN and KNN in detecting early-stage ulcers is promising in terms of integration into clinical decision support systems. In future studies, the clinical validity of the model should be increased with multicenter datasets and visual-data-based hybrid models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Pressure ulcers are a serious clinical problem associated with high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Existing risk assessment tools, such as the Braden Score, are often inadequate in ICU patients and have poor discriminatory power between classes. This increases the need for more sensitive, predictive and integrative systems. The aim of this study was to classify pressure ulcer stages (Stages I-IV) with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms using demographic, clinical and laboratory data of ICU patients and to evaluate the model performance at a level that can be integrated into clinical decision support systems. Methods: A total of 200 patients hospitalized in the ICU were included in the study. Using demographic, clinical and laboratory data of the patients, six different machine learning algorithms (SVM, KNN, ANN, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes and Discriminant Analysis) were used for classification. The models were evaluated using confusion matrices, ROC-AUC analyses and metrics such as class-based sensitivity and error rate. Results: SVM, KNN and ANN models showed the highest success in classifying pressure ulcer stages, achieving 99% overall accuracy and excellent performance with AUC = 1.00. Variables such as Braden score, albumin and CRP levels contributed significantly to model performance. ROC curves showed that the models provided strong discrimination between classes. Key predictors of pressure ulcer severity included prolonged ICU stay (p < 0.001), low albumin (Stage I: 3.4 ± 0.5 g/dL vs. Stage IV: 2.4 ± 0.8 g/dL; p < 0.001) and high CRP (Stage I: 28 mg/L vs. Stage IV: 142 mg/L; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study shows that machine learning algorithms offer high accuracy and generalization potential in pressure ulcer classification. In particular, the effectiveness of algorithms such as SVM, ANN and KNN in detecting early-stage ulcers is promising in terms of integration into clinical decision support systems. In future studies, the clinical validity of the model should be increased with multicenter datasets and visual-data-based hybrid models.

机器学习在重症患者压疮预测及分期分类中的应用。
背景/目的:压疮是一种严重的临床问题,具有高发病率、高死亡率和高医疗费用,特别是在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中。现有的风险评估工具,如布雷登评分(Braden Score),在ICU患者中往往存在不足,而且在班级间的区分能力较差。这增加了对更敏感、更有预测性和更综合的系统的需求。本研究的目的是利用机器学习算法,利用ICU患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据,高精度地对压疮分期(I-IV期)进行分类,并在可集成到临床决策支持系统的水平上评估模型的性能。方法:选取200例ICU住院患者作为研究对象。根据患者的人口学、临床和实验室数据,使用六种不同的机器学习算法(SVM、KNN、ANN、决策树、朴素贝叶斯和判别分析)进行分类。使用混淆矩阵、ROC-AUC分析和基于类别的灵敏度和错误率等指标对模型进行评估。结果:SVM、KNN和ANN模型对压疮分期的分类成功率最高,总体准确率达到99%,AUC = 1.00,表现优异。布雷登评分、白蛋白和CRP水平等变量对模型性能有显著影响。ROC曲线显示,模型具有很强的类间判别性。压疮严重程度的关键预测因素包括ICU住院时间延长(p < 0.001)、低白蛋白(I期:3.4±0.5 g/dL vs. IV期:2.4±0.8 g/dL;p < 0.001)和高CRP (I期:28 mg/L vs. IV期:142 mg/L;P < 0.001)。结论:本研究表明机器学习算法在压疮分类中具有较高的准确性和推广潜力。特别是,SVM、ANN和KNN等算法在检测早期溃疡方面的有效性在整合到临床决策支持系统方面是有希望的。在未来的研究中,应该通过多中心数据集和基于视觉数据的混合模型来提高模型的临床有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信