Beyond Food Safety: Taxonomization of Private Initiatives to Design of Healthier Supermarket Environments.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ana Ines Estevez Magnasco, Dominic Lemken, Hanna Ihli
{"title":"Beyond Food Safety: Taxonomization of Private Initiatives to Design of Healthier Supermarket Environments.","authors":"Ana Ines Estevez Magnasco, Dominic Lemken, Hanna Ihli","doi":"10.1007/s13668-025-00660-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While policies targeting education in schools, marketing campaigns, and taxation strategies are of great importance in tackling our population's malnutrition, there is growing concern about enhancing the supermarket environment to promote healthier food consumption. Supermarkets play a significant role in presenting food options. As gatekeepers of the food system's impact on consumers' health, they have the power to help people make better food choices. Recent shifts in the policy agendas in countries like Germany reflect this trend, with new nutrition-focused behavioural policies being legislated and implemented. However, there remains a lack of specific guidelines on how supermarket environments can be structured to promote healthier purchases. What strategies could enhance consumer well-being when making food choices?. Following the PRISMA framework, we harvested sources published since the SDGs (2015) release related to sustainable nutrition policies set by supermarkets. Using the INFORMAS modular structure framework, WHO action areas as guidance, and the reviewed documents, we created a taxonomy for policy initiatives that could improve the supermarket environment and promote healthy choices. Consequently, we studied the private policies of major supermarket groups (Rewe, Lidl, Aldi Nord, Aldi Sud and Edeka), examining their projects and campaigns designed to improve supermarket environments and encourage consumers to choose healthy food options.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>From the taxonomy, comprised of the categories of campaigns, food reformulation, labelling, and marketing, the main categories of campaigns and labelling were thoroughly developed in all the analysed policies whereas food reformulation and marketing categories were analysed in 80% of them. Our analysis revealed that the implementation of sustainable nutrition policies appears to have been embraced by all supermarket groups providing general healthy and sustainable nutrition strategies, except for the Edeka. Notably, supermarkets have actively participated in the creation of private sustainable nutrition policies, presenting similar strategies across the board. However, while supermarkets have demonstrated commitment to promoting healthy and sustainable purchases, there is a need for greater coherence and alignment in reporting mechanisms to allow accurate comparison between initiatives. There´s an urgent need to focus on human welfare, where the purchase environment is healthy and promotes nutritious choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10844,"journal":{"name":"Current Nutrition Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Nutrition Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-025-00660-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: While policies targeting education in schools, marketing campaigns, and taxation strategies are of great importance in tackling our population's malnutrition, there is growing concern about enhancing the supermarket environment to promote healthier food consumption. Supermarkets play a significant role in presenting food options. As gatekeepers of the food system's impact on consumers' health, they have the power to help people make better food choices. Recent shifts in the policy agendas in countries like Germany reflect this trend, with new nutrition-focused behavioural policies being legislated and implemented. However, there remains a lack of specific guidelines on how supermarket environments can be structured to promote healthier purchases. What strategies could enhance consumer well-being when making food choices?. Following the PRISMA framework, we harvested sources published since the SDGs (2015) release related to sustainable nutrition policies set by supermarkets. Using the INFORMAS modular structure framework, WHO action areas as guidance, and the reviewed documents, we created a taxonomy for policy initiatives that could improve the supermarket environment and promote healthy choices. Consequently, we studied the private policies of major supermarket groups (Rewe, Lidl, Aldi Nord, Aldi Sud and Edeka), examining their projects and campaigns designed to improve supermarket environments and encourage consumers to choose healthy food options.

Recent findings: From the taxonomy, comprised of the categories of campaigns, food reformulation, labelling, and marketing, the main categories of campaigns and labelling were thoroughly developed in all the analysed policies whereas food reformulation and marketing categories were analysed in 80% of them. Our analysis revealed that the implementation of sustainable nutrition policies appears to have been embraced by all supermarket groups providing general healthy and sustainable nutrition strategies, except for the Edeka. Notably, supermarkets have actively participated in the creation of private sustainable nutrition policies, presenting similar strategies across the board. However, while supermarkets have demonstrated commitment to promoting healthy and sustainable purchases, there is a need for greater coherence and alignment in reporting mechanisms to allow accurate comparison between initiatives. There´s an urgent need to focus on human welfare, where the purchase environment is healthy and promotes nutritious choices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超越食品安全:设计更健康超市环境的私人倡议分类。
审查目的:虽然针对学校教育、营销活动和税收策略的政策在解决我国人口营养不良问题方面非常重要,但人们越来越关注改善超市环境以促进更健康的食品消费。超市在提供食物选择方面发挥着重要作用。作为食品系统对消费者健康影响的看门人,他们有能力帮助人们做出更好的食品选择。最近德国等国政策议程的转变反映了这一趋势,以营养为重点的新行为政策正在立法和实施。然而,关于如何构建超市环境以促进更健康的消费,仍然缺乏具体的指导方针。什么策略可以提高消费者在选择食物时的幸福感?根据PRISMA框架,我们收集了自可持续发展目标(2015年)发布以来发布的与超市制定的可持续营养政策相关的资料。我们利用信息系统的模块化结构框架、世卫组织的行动领域作为指导,以及经审查的文件,为能够改善超市环境和促进健康选择的政策举措制定了分类。因此,我们研究了主要超市集团(Rewe、Lidl、Aldi Nord、Aldi Sud和Edeka)的私人政策,审查了他们旨在改善超市环境和鼓励消费者选择健康食品的项目和活动。最近的发现:从由运动、食品配方、标签和营销类别组成的分类来看,在所有分析的政策中,运动和标签的主要类别都得到了彻底的发展,而其中80%的政策对食品配方和营销类别进行了分析。我们的分析显示,除了Edeka之外,所有提供一般健康和可持续营养策略的超市集团似乎都接受了可持续营养政策的实施。值得注意的是,超市积极参与制定私人可持续营养政策,全面提出类似的战略。然而,尽管超市已表现出促进健康和可持续采购的承诺,但报告机制需要更大的一致性和一致性,以便对各项举措进行准确比较。迫切需要关注人类福利,在那里购买环境是健康的,并促进营养选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Nutrition Reports
Current Nutrition Reports Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide comprehensive review articles that emphasize significant developments in nutrition research emerging in recent publications. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to discuss the influence of nutrition on major health conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and obesity, as well as the impact of nutrition on genetics, metabolic function, and public health. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 25 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, suggests topics of special importance to their country/region, and ensures that topics and current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信