Trang Thi Thuy Vu, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen, Trung The Van
{"title":"S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment.","authors":"Trang Thi Thuy Vu, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen, Trung The Van","doi":"10.4081/dr.2025.10231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11049,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2025.10231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.
银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)被广泛用于临床评估银屑病的活动性;然而,它的局限性阻碍了它在日常应用中的实用性。银屑病严重程度评估简易测量法(S-MAPA)作为一种有前景的工具,解决了这些局限性,为评估疾病严重程度提供了更可行的方法。本研究旨在评估S-MAPA作为现有银屑病严重程度测量仪器的敏感和实用替代方案。采用体表面积(BSA)、医师整体评估(PGA)、S-MAPA、PASI和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)对银屑病患者进行评估。同时检测血浆高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平。Spearman的相关分析比较了这些评估工具与hs-CRP水平之间的关系。2019年1月至7月期间共进行了100次评估。S-MAPA评分和PASI与疾病严重程度呈显著正相关(r=0.9315, p