Artificial Intelligence as a Potential Tool for Predicting Surgical Margin Status in Early Breast Cancer Using Mammographic Specimen Images.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
David Andras, Radu Alexandru Ilies, Victor Esanu, Stefan Agoston, Tudor Florin Marginean Jumate, George Calin Dindelegan
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence as a Potential Tool for Predicting Surgical Margin Status in Early Breast Cancer Using Mammographic Specimen Images.","authors":"David Andras, Radu Alexandru Ilies, Victor Esanu, Stefan Agoston, Tudor Florin Marginean Jumate, George Calin Dindelegan","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15101276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women globally, with an increasing incidence, particularly in younger populations. Achieving complete surgical excision is essential to reduce recurrence. Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models like ChatGPT, has potential for supporting diagnostic tasks, though its role in surgical oncology remains limited. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study evaluated ChatGPT's performance (ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, March 2025) in predicting surgical margin status (R0 or R1) based on intraoperative mammograms of lumpectomy specimens. AI-generated responses were compared with histopathological findings. Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and Cohen's kappa coefficient. <b>Results</b>: Out of a total of 100 patients, ChatGPT achieved an accuracy of 84.0% in predicting surgical margin status. Sensitivity for identifying R1 cases (incomplete excision) was 60.0%, while specificity for R0 (complete excision) was 86.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 33.3%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.1%. The F1 score for R1 classification was 0.43, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.34, indicating moderate agreement with histopathological findings. <b>Conclusions</b>: ChatGPT demonstrated moderate accuracy in confirming complete excision but showed limited reliability in identifying incomplete margins. While promising, these findings emphasize the need for domain-specific training and further validation before such models can be implemented in clinical breast cancer workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women globally, with an increasing incidence, particularly in younger populations. Achieving complete surgical excision is essential to reduce recurrence. Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models like ChatGPT, has potential for supporting diagnostic tasks, though its role in surgical oncology remains limited. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated ChatGPT's performance (ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, March 2025) in predicting surgical margin status (R0 or R1) based on intraoperative mammograms of lumpectomy specimens. AI-generated responses were compared with histopathological findings. Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: Out of a total of 100 patients, ChatGPT achieved an accuracy of 84.0% in predicting surgical margin status. Sensitivity for identifying R1 cases (incomplete excision) was 60.0%, while specificity for R0 (complete excision) was 86.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 33.3%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.1%. The F1 score for R1 classification was 0.43, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.34, indicating moderate agreement with histopathological findings. Conclusions: ChatGPT demonstrated moderate accuracy in confirming complete excision but showed limited reliability in identifying incomplete margins. While promising, these findings emphasize the need for domain-specific training and further validation before such models can be implemented in clinical breast cancer workflows.

人工智能作为一种潜在的工具来预测早期乳腺癌乳房x线摄影标本图像的手术边缘状态。
背景/目的:乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤,发病率不断上升,尤其是在年轻人群中。实现完全的手术切除是减少复发的必要条件。人工智能(AI),包括像ChatGPT这样的大型语言模型,具有支持诊断任务的潜力,尽管它在外科肿瘤学中的作用仍然有限。方法:本回顾性研究评估ChatGPT的性能(ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, 2025年3月)预测手术边缘状态(R0或R1)基于乳房肿瘤切除术标本的术中乳房x线照片。将人工智能产生的反应与组织病理学结果进行比较。使用敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、F1评分和Cohen’s kappa系数来评估疗效。结果:在总共100例患者中,ChatGPT预测手术切缘状态的准确率为84.0%。R1(不完全切除)的敏感性为60.0%,R0(完全切除)的特异性为86.7%。阳性预测值(PPV) 33.3%,阴性预测值(NPV) 95.1%。R1分类F1评分为0.43,Cohen’s kappa系数为0.34,与组织病理学结果有中等程度的吻合。结论:ChatGPT在确认完全切除方面表现出中等的准确性,但在识别不完全切缘方面表现出有限的可靠性。虽然有希望,但这些发现强调了在将这些模型应用于临床乳腺癌工作流程之前,需要进行特定领域的培训和进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信