Longitudinal analysis of pain-induced brain activations in post-traumatic headache.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1177/03331024251345160
Dohyun Ku, Lingchao Mao, Simona Nikolova, Gina M Dumkrieger, Katherine B Ross, Matthew Huentelman, Trent Anderson, Frank Porreca, Edita Navratilova, Amaal Starling, Teresa Wu, Jing Li, Catherine D Chong, Todd J Schwedt
{"title":"Longitudinal analysis of pain-induced brain activations in post-traumatic headache.","authors":"Dohyun Ku, Lingchao Mao, Simona Nikolova, Gina M Dumkrieger, Katherine B Ross, Matthew Huentelman, Trent Anderson, Frank Porreca, Edita Navratilova, Amaal Starling, Teresa Wu, Jing Li, Catherine D Chong, Todd J Schwedt","doi":"10.1177/03331024251345160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHeadache is a common symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Post-traumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder that develops after mTBI, often persists for months or years. To identify potential recovery mechanisms and prognostic biomarkers, the present study investigated whether longitudinal changes in pain-induced brain activation differ between healthy controls (HC) and PTH participants showing headache improvement and those without improvement.MethodsThirty-three participants who met International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for acute PTH within 59 days post-mTBI and 33 HC participants were included with no significant differences in demographics. All participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline, four weeks, and 16 weeks post-enrollment using a thermal stimulation paradigm with noxious and non-painful heat stimuli. 'Painful vs. Non-Painful Heat' contrasts were generated using SPM12. PTH improvement was assessed at three months post-enrollment via electronic headache diaries. Two-sample <i>t</i>-tests compared the brain activation between HC and PTH at baseline. Linear mixed-effects models examined longitudinal changes for HC, PTH improvement and non-improvement groups across visits. Generalized linear models compared these groups within visits.ResultsBaseline analysis revealed several regions with significantly higher activation in acute PTH compared to HC, including bilateral postcentral gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, left inferior parietal gyrus, right superior parietal gyrus, left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, left gyrus rectus, and left middle occipital gyrus. Over time, the PTH improvement group demonstrated progressive normalization across all identified brain regions, whereas the non-improvement group showed only partial normalization in left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, and left gyrus rectus. Sustained elevated activation in specific regions distinguished PTH participants without headache improvement from those with headache improvement, suggesting potential biomarkers for persistent PTH.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate significantly altered pain-induced brain activations in participants with acute PTH compared to HC. Longitudinal analysis revealed distinct recovery trajectories: progressive normalization in the improvement group versus persistent alterations in the non-improvement group. These neuroimaging patterns may serve as biomarkers for identifying individuals at risk for persistent PTH, with implications for early intervention and personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 5","pages":"3331024251345160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251345160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHeadache is a common symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Post-traumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder that develops after mTBI, often persists for months or years. To identify potential recovery mechanisms and prognostic biomarkers, the present study investigated whether longitudinal changes in pain-induced brain activation differ between healthy controls (HC) and PTH participants showing headache improvement and those without improvement.MethodsThirty-three participants who met International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for acute PTH within 59 days post-mTBI and 33 HC participants were included with no significant differences in demographics. All participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline, four weeks, and 16 weeks post-enrollment using a thermal stimulation paradigm with noxious and non-painful heat stimuli. 'Painful vs. Non-Painful Heat' contrasts were generated using SPM12. PTH improvement was assessed at three months post-enrollment via electronic headache diaries. Two-sample t-tests compared the brain activation between HC and PTH at baseline. Linear mixed-effects models examined longitudinal changes for HC, PTH improvement and non-improvement groups across visits. Generalized linear models compared these groups within visits.ResultsBaseline analysis revealed several regions with significantly higher activation in acute PTH compared to HC, including bilateral postcentral gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, left inferior parietal gyrus, right superior parietal gyrus, left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, left gyrus rectus, and left middle occipital gyrus. Over time, the PTH improvement group demonstrated progressive normalization across all identified brain regions, whereas the non-improvement group showed only partial normalization in left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, and left gyrus rectus. Sustained elevated activation in specific regions distinguished PTH participants without headache improvement from those with headache improvement, suggesting potential biomarkers for persistent PTH.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate significantly altered pain-induced brain activations in participants with acute PTH compared to HC. Longitudinal analysis revealed distinct recovery trajectories: progressive normalization in the improvement group versus persistent alterations in the non-improvement group. These neuroimaging patterns may serve as biomarkers for identifying individuals at risk for persistent PTH, with implications for early intervention and personalized treatment approaches.

创伤后头痛患者疼痛引起的脑激活的纵向分析。
背景:头痛是轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后的常见症状。创伤后头痛(PTH)是mTBI后发生的继发性头痛疾病,通常持续数月或数年。为了确定潜在的恢复机制和预后生物标志物,本研究调查了疼痛引起的脑激活的纵向变化在健康对照(HC)和PTH参与者之间是否存在差异,显示头痛改善和未改善。方法纳入33例mtbi后59天内符合《国际头痛疾病分类》第3版急性PTH标准的患者和33例HC患者,统计学差异无统计学意义。所有参与者在入组后的基线、4周和16周接受了功能性磁共振成像扫描,使用了有害和非疼痛性热刺激的热刺激范式。使用SPM12生成“疼痛与非疼痛热”对比。通过电子头痛日记在登记后三个月评估PTH改善情况。双样本t检验比较HC和PTH在基线时的脑活动。线性混合效应模型检验了HC、PTH改善组和非改善组的纵向变化。广义线性模型在访问期间比较了这些组。结果基线分析显示,与HC相比,急性PTH的几个区域的激活明显更高,包括双侧中央后回、右侧颞上回、右侧颞中回、左侧顶叶下回、右侧顶叶上回、左侧腹侧纹状体、左侧嗅觉皮层、左侧直回和左侧枕中回。随着时间的推移,PTH改善组在所有确定的大脑区域表现出逐步正常化,而非改善组在左侧腹侧纹状体,左侧嗅觉皮层和左侧直回中仅表现出部分正常化。特定区域持续升高的激活区分了没有头痛改善的PTH参与者和头痛改善的PTH参与者,这提示了持续性PTH的潜在生物标志物。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与HC相比,急性PTH患者疼痛诱导的脑激活显著改变。纵向分析揭示了明显的恢复轨迹:改善组的逐渐正常化与非改善组的持续改变。这些神经成像模式可以作为识别持续性甲状旁腺癌风险个体的生物标志物,对早期干预和个性化治疗方法具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信