Symptom Burden Poorly Responsive to Palliative Care Intervention and Karnofsky Predict Survival in an Acute Palliative Care Unit.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.3390/cancers17101704
Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alessandra Casuccio
{"title":"Symptom Burden Poorly Responsive to Palliative Care Intervention and Karnofsky Predict Survival in an Acute Palliative Care Unit.","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alessandra Casuccio","doi":"10.3390/cancers17101704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Survival prediction in the advanced cancer care setting plays a vital role <b>in</b> treatment planning and patients' arrangements. The aim of this study was to examine the association of the global Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (GESAS) and Karnofsky scale (KPS) with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancers admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU). The second aim was to assess if GESAS changes after comprehensive palliative treatment could influence OS. <b>Methods:</b> This is a prospective planned sub-analysis of advanced cancer patients. A consecutive sample of 521 patients admitted to an APCU. Patients with available survival in follow-up phone calls, having complete ESAS, and discharged alive were selected. KPS and GESAS were measured at admission and after seven days of individual comprehensive palliative care. <b>Results:</b> Two hundred forty-three of 521 screened patients were assessed according to inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67.1 years (SD 11.5), and 121 patients were male. The mean KPS was 43.5 (SD 9.3). The mean OS was 74.6 (SD 136.2) days. Significant changes in GESAS were observed after one week. Univariate linear regression analysis showed that KPS and GESAS at T0 and at T7 were correlated with OS (<i>p</i> < 0.0005; <i>p</i> = 0.020; <i>p</i> < 0.0005, respectively). At multivariate analysis, OS was correlated with KPS and GESAS at discharge (B = 3.349, 95% CI = 1.560-5.137; B = -2.430, 95% CI = -3.831--1.029). <b>Discussion:</b> KPS and poor response to intensive treatment, maintaining high GESAS scores, can be considered predictive factors of shorter OS. Further studies should confirm whether a specialized intervention in other settings can improve OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Survival prediction in the advanced cancer care setting plays a vital role in treatment planning and patients' arrangements. The aim of this study was to examine the association of the global Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (GESAS) and Karnofsky scale (KPS) with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancers admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU). The second aim was to assess if GESAS changes after comprehensive palliative treatment could influence OS. Methods: This is a prospective planned sub-analysis of advanced cancer patients. A consecutive sample of 521 patients admitted to an APCU. Patients with available survival in follow-up phone calls, having complete ESAS, and discharged alive were selected. KPS and GESAS were measured at admission and after seven days of individual comprehensive palliative care. Results: Two hundred forty-three of 521 screened patients were assessed according to inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67.1 years (SD 11.5), and 121 patients were male. The mean KPS was 43.5 (SD 9.3). The mean OS was 74.6 (SD 136.2) days. Significant changes in GESAS were observed after one week. Univariate linear regression analysis showed that KPS and GESAS at T0 and at T7 were correlated with OS (p < 0.0005; p = 0.020; p < 0.0005, respectively). At multivariate analysis, OS was correlated with KPS and GESAS at discharge (B = 3.349, 95% CI = 1.560-5.137; B = -2.430, 95% CI = -3.831--1.029). Discussion: KPS and poor response to intensive treatment, maintaining high GESAS scores, can be considered predictive factors of shorter OS. Further studies should confirm whether a specialized intervention in other settings can improve OS.

症状负担对姑息治疗干预反应不良和Karnofsky预测急性姑息治疗病房的生存。
背景/目的:生存预测在晚期癌症护理中对治疗计划和患者安排起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在探讨全球埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(GESAS)和Karnofsky量表(KPS)与急性姑息治疗病房(APCU)晚期癌症患者总生存期(OS)的关系。第二个目的是评估综合姑息治疗后GESAS的改变是否会影响OS。方法:对晚期癌症患者进行前瞻性计划亚分析。连续521例患者进入APCU。选择随访电话中存活、ESAS完成、活着出院的患者。在入院时和个体综合姑息治疗7天后测量KPS和GESAS。结果:521例筛查患者中有243例按照纳入标准进行了评估。平均年龄67.1岁(SD 11.5),男性121例。平均KPS为43.5 (SD 9.3)。平均OS为74.6 (SD 136.2)天。一周后观察到GESAS有明显变化。单因素线性回归分析显示,T0和T7时KPS和GESAS与OS相关(p < 0.0005;P = 0.020;P < 0.0005)。多因素分析显示,OS与排出时KPS、GESAS相关(B = 3.349, 95% CI = 1.560 ~ 5.137;B = -2.430, 95% ci = -3.831—1.029)。讨论:KPS和强化治疗反应差,维持较高的GESAS评分,可视为较短OS的预测因素。进一步的研究应该证实在其他环境下的专门干预是否可以改善OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信