Effectiveness and safety of greenlight laser in ureteroscopic parapelvic cyst incision: a retrospective analysis.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yongxiang Shao, Meng Cheng, Conglei Hu, Lingchen Kong, Zilong Liang, Haofeng Pang, Haiyang Du, Liping Yao, Qian Zhang, Fei Liu
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of greenlight laser in ureteroscopic parapelvic cyst incision: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Yongxiang Shao, Meng Cheng, Conglei Hu, Lingchen Kong, Zilong Liang, Haofeng Pang, Haiyang Du, Liping Yao, Qian Zhang, Fei Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01813-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Different surgical managements for parapelvic cysts may vary in efficacy and safety. Considering the distinct characteristics of greenlight laser, this study aimed to compare three treatments for parapelvic cysts: flexible ureteroscopic internal incision and drainage with greenlight laser, or with holmium laser, and retroperitoneal laparoscopic cyst unroofing. The focus was on evaluating and contrasting the advantages of greenlight versus holmium laser in this context.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 62 patients with parapelvic cysts who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to January 2023 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. All patients received CT or ultrasound examination, and were diagnosed with parapelvic cysts by radiologists and urologists. Patients were divided into three groups according to treatment: (1) flexible ureteroscopy with greenlight laser internal incision (n = 18), (2) flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser internal incision (n = 21), and (3) laparoscopic cyst unroofing decompression (n = 23). Outcomes of the 3 groups were analyzed. The safety and effectiveness of the three surgical methods were evaluated by comparing the imaging examination data before and 6 months after the operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in age, gender, side, or size of the cysts among the three groups. Shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer postoperative complications were observed in flexible ureteroscopic laser endotomy groups, compared to laparoscopic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flexible ureteroscopic laser internal incision demonstrated several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including shorter operation time and less blood loss. The greenlight laser exhibited obvious advantage of shorter incision time in the treatment of parapelvic cyst, which made it worthy of clinical application. Our findings might provide evidence to the selection of ideal methods for treating parapelvic cysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01813-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Different surgical managements for parapelvic cysts may vary in efficacy and safety. Considering the distinct characteristics of greenlight laser, this study aimed to compare three treatments for parapelvic cysts: flexible ureteroscopic internal incision and drainage with greenlight laser, or with holmium laser, and retroperitoneal laparoscopic cyst unroofing. The focus was on evaluating and contrasting the advantages of greenlight versus holmium laser in this context.

Patients and methods: A total of 62 patients with parapelvic cysts who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to January 2023 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. All patients received CT or ultrasound examination, and were diagnosed with parapelvic cysts by radiologists and urologists. Patients were divided into three groups according to treatment: (1) flexible ureteroscopy with greenlight laser internal incision (n = 18), (2) flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser internal incision (n = 21), and (3) laparoscopic cyst unroofing decompression (n = 23). Outcomes of the 3 groups were analyzed. The safety and effectiveness of the three surgical methods were evaluated by comparing the imaging examination data before and 6 months after the operation.

Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, side, or size of the cysts among the three groups. Shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer postoperative complications were observed in flexible ureteroscopic laser endotomy groups, compared to laparoscopic group.

Conclusion: Flexible ureteroscopic laser internal incision demonstrated several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including shorter operation time and less blood loss. The greenlight laser exhibited obvious advantage of shorter incision time in the treatment of parapelvic cyst, which made it worthy of clinical application. Our findings might provide evidence to the selection of ideal methods for treating parapelvic cysts.

绿光激光在输尿管镜下盆腔旁囊肿切开中的有效性和安全性回顾性分析。
目的:骨盆旁囊肿的不同手术治疗方法在疗效和安全性上存在差异。考虑到绿光激光的独特特点,本研究旨在比较三种治疗盆腔旁囊肿的方法:柔性输尿管镜下绿光激光内切开引流,或钬激光引流,以及腹膜后腹腔镜下囊肿去顶。在这种情况下,重点是评估和对比绿光和钬激光的优势。患者和方法:回顾性收集2018年1月至2023年1月手术治疗的符合纳入和排除标准的盆腔旁囊肿患者62例。所有患者均接受CT或超声检查,并由放射科医生和泌尿科医生诊断为盆腔旁囊肿。根据治疗方法将患者分为三组:(1)绿光激光内切口输尿管软镜组(18例),(2)钬激光内切口输尿管软镜组(21例),(3)腹腔镜囊肿开顶减压组(23例)。分析三组患者的预后。通过对比术前和术后6个月影像学检查资料,评价三种手术方式的安全性和有效性。结果:三组患者在年龄、性别、侧面、囊肿大小等方面均无明显差异。输尿管软镜激光内切组手术时间较腹腔镜组短,术中出血量少,术后并发症少。结论:输尿管软腔镜激光内切口较腹腔镜手术具有手术时间短、出血量少等优点。绿光激光治疗盆腔旁囊肿具有明显的优势,切口时间短,值得临床推广应用。我们的发现可能为选择治疗盆腔旁囊肿的理想方法提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信