Factors associated with respectful maternity care reported by patients in selected health facilities in Musanze District, Rwanda: a facility-based cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexandre Dukundane, Jean Nepomuscene Renzaho, Victor Mivumbi Ndicunguye, Ephrem Daniel Sheferaw, Alemayehu Amberbir
{"title":"Factors associated with respectful maternity care reported by patients in selected health facilities in Musanze District, Rwanda: a facility-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alexandre Dukundane, Jean Nepomuscene Renzaho, Victor Mivumbi Ndicunguye, Ephrem Daniel Sheferaw, Alemayehu Amberbir","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03803-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respectful maternity care (RMC) is an essential strategy to scale up mothers' positive experiences during childbirth. However, few studies have been conducted to quantify the practice in Rwanda. The main objective of this study was to determine the proportion of the RMC approach in health facilities and associated factors in Musanze District in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a health facility-based cross-sectional study conducted among 335 women who delivered at eight healthcare facilities including hospital and health centers in Musanze District between March to May 2024. We used simple random sampling to select health centers and included all participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria until the predetermined sample size was reached. The proportion of RMC as an outcome variable was calculated from the 30-item PCMC Scale, and RMC was considered to have been received if a woman responded \"2 = yes, most of the time\" and \"3 = yes, all the time\" to all the 30 items. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the provision of RMC such as employment status, parity, and place of delivery. The results were reported using odds ratios with the 95% CI. Variables were proved statistically significant based on p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>335 participants were enrolled in this study. The majority of respondents were between 25-34 years (54.0%) and married (74.3%). The proportion of respectful maternity care was 65.1% (95% CI: 59.7-70.2). Being employed was associated with receiving RMC [AOR = 17.75, 95%CI:8.06-39.06, p < 0.001]. Primiparous women compared to multiparous had higher odds of receiving RMC [AOR = 5.15, 95%CI:2.07-12.79, p < 0.001]. Cesarean deliveries were associated with a greater likelihood of RMC compared to those who delivered vaginally [AOR = 6.00, 95%CI:2.40-15.03, p-value = 0.003]. Women who delivered at health centers were more likely to receive RMC than those who delivered in hospitals [AOR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.41-9.83, p = 0.008]. Daytime deliveries were more likely to receive RMC than nighttime deliveries (AOR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.52-6.37, p = 0.002). Additionally, women with insurance other than Rwanda's Community Based Health Insurance had higher odds of receiving RMC (AOR = 4.46, 95% CI: 1.88-10.61, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of respectful maternity care in Musanze District was found to be 65.1%. Interventions to improve respectful maternity care should focus on training healthcare providers about its components, including dignity and respect, autonomy and communication, and social support, in addition to educating the community to request quality care. These findings call upon policy makers to involve different stakeholders to come up with interventions to improve quality of care during childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03803-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respectful maternity care (RMC) is an essential strategy to scale up mothers' positive experiences during childbirth. However, few studies have been conducted to quantify the practice in Rwanda. The main objective of this study was to determine the proportion of the RMC approach in health facilities and associated factors in Musanze District in Rwanda.

Methods: This is a health facility-based cross-sectional study conducted among 335 women who delivered at eight healthcare facilities including hospital and health centers in Musanze District between March to May 2024. We used simple random sampling to select health centers and included all participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria until the predetermined sample size was reached. The proportion of RMC as an outcome variable was calculated from the 30-item PCMC Scale, and RMC was considered to have been received if a woman responded "2 = yes, most of the time" and "3 = yes, all the time" to all the 30 items. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the provision of RMC such as employment status, parity, and place of delivery. The results were reported using odds ratios with the 95% CI. Variables were proved statistically significant based on p < 0.05.

Results: 335 participants were enrolled in this study. The majority of respondents were between 25-34 years (54.0%) and married (74.3%). The proportion of respectful maternity care was 65.1% (95% CI: 59.7-70.2). Being employed was associated with receiving RMC [AOR = 17.75, 95%CI:8.06-39.06, p < 0.001]. Primiparous women compared to multiparous had higher odds of receiving RMC [AOR = 5.15, 95%CI:2.07-12.79, p < 0.001]. Cesarean deliveries were associated with a greater likelihood of RMC compared to those who delivered vaginally [AOR = 6.00, 95%CI:2.40-15.03, p-value = 0.003]. Women who delivered at health centers were more likely to receive RMC than those who delivered in hospitals [AOR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.41-9.83, p = 0.008]. Daytime deliveries were more likely to receive RMC than nighttime deliveries (AOR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.52-6.37, p = 0.002). Additionally, women with insurance other than Rwanda's Community Based Health Insurance had higher odds of receiving RMC (AOR = 4.46, 95% CI: 1.88-10.61, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The level of respectful maternity care in Musanze District was found to be 65.1%. Interventions to improve respectful maternity care should focus on training healthcare providers about its components, including dignity and respect, autonomy and communication, and social support, in addition to educating the community to request quality care. These findings call upon policy makers to involve different stakeholders to come up with interventions to improve quality of care during childbirth.

卢旺达穆桑泽区选定卫生机构中患者报告的与尊重产妇护理相关的因素:一项基于设施的横断面研究。
背景:尊重产妇护理(RMC)是扩大母亲在分娩期间的积极体验的重要策略。然而,很少有研究对卢旺达的这种做法进行量化。本研究的主要目的是确定卢旺达穆桑泽区卫生设施中RMC方法的比例及其相关因素。方法:这是一项基于卫生机构的横断面研究,对2024年3月至5月期间在木桑则区医院和卫生中心等8个卫生机构分娩的335名妇女进行了研究。我们采用简单随机抽样的方法选择医疗中心,纳入所有符合纳入标准的参与者,直到达到预定的样本量。RMC作为结果变量的比例从30项PCMC量表中计算,如果女性对所有30项的回答为“2 =是,大部分时间”和“3 =是,一直”,则认为收到了RMC。我们使用多元逻辑回归来确定与RMC提供相关的因素,如就业状况、平价和交付地点。结果采用95% CI的比值比进行报道。结果:本研究共纳入335名受试者。大多数受访者年龄在25-34岁之间(54.0%),已婚(74.3%)。尊重产妇护理的比例为65.1% (95% CI: 59.7-70.2)。受雇与接受RMC相关[AOR = 17.75, 95%CI:8.06-39.06, p]结论:木桑则区尊重性产科护理水平为65.1%。改善尊重产妇护理的干预措施应侧重于培训保健提供者了解其组成部分,包括尊严和尊重、自主和沟通以及社会支持,此外还应教育社区要求高质量的护理。这些发现呼吁政策制定者让不同的利益相关者参与进来,提出干预措施,以提高分娩期间的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信