Impact of metacarpal shortening on finger strength following non-surgical treatment of spiral and oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Martina Nöbel, Daniel Muder
{"title":"Impact of metacarpal shortening on finger strength following non-surgical treatment of spiral and oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.","authors":"Martina Nöbel, Daniel Muder","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08776-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment options for spiral/oblique metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs) include both operative and non-operative approaches. Non-operative treatment with early mobilization has been shown to reduce treatment costs and sick leave, while maintaining grip strength despite metacarpal shortening. However, the impact of metacarpal shortening on strength at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether a shortening of more than 2 mm in spiral/oblique MSFs affects the strength of a single finger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 23 patients with metacarpal shortening greater than 2 mm following a spiral/oblique MSF were included. The primary outcomes were flexion and extension strength in the MCP and PIP joints, compared to the uninjured hand. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, grip strength, metacarpal shortening, DASH score, patient satisfaction, pain levels, and return to work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences observed in grip strength, range of motion, or MCP joint extension. However, PIP joint flexion and extension, as well as MCP joint flexion, were significantly reduced. The DASH scores were generally low (mean 4, range 0-23), with patients reporting no pain and high satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, finger strength was statistically significantly reduced, but its clinical relevance remains unclear. Despite these findings, the low DASH scores and high patient satisfaction suggest that the functional impact of these changes may be minimal for most patients. We recommend discussing these findings with individuals who heavily rely on dexterity, such as professional musicians or other precision skill workers.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08776-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for spiral/oblique metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs) include both operative and non-operative approaches. Non-operative treatment with early mobilization has been shown to reduce treatment costs and sick leave, while maintaining grip strength despite metacarpal shortening. However, the impact of metacarpal shortening on strength at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether a shortening of more than 2 mm in spiral/oblique MSFs affects the strength of a single finger.

Methods: A total of 23 patients with metacarpal shortening greater than 2 mm following a spiral/oblique MSF were included. The primary outcomes were flexion and extension strength in the MCP and PIP joints, compared to the uninjured hand. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, grip strength, metacarpal shortening, DASH score, patient satisfaction, pain levels, and return to work.

Results: There were no differences observed in grip strength, range of motion, or MCP joint extension. However, PIP joint flexion and extension, as well as MCP joint flexion, were significantly reduced. The DASH scores were generally low (mean 4, range 0-23), with patients reporting no pain and high satisfaction.

Conclusions: In conclusion, finger strength was statistically significantly reduced, but its clinical relevance remains unclear. Despite these findings, the low DASH scores and high patient satisfaction suggest that the functional impact of these changes may be minimal for most patients. We recommend discussing these findings with individuals who heavily rely on dexterity, such as professional musicians or other precision skill workers.

Level of evidence: IV.

非手术治疗螺旋型和斜型掌骨骨折后掌骨缩短对手指力量的影响。
背景:螺旋/斜向掌骨干骨折(MSFs)的治疗方案包括手术和非手术两种入路。早期活动的非手术治疗已被证明可以减少治疗费用和病假,同时在掌骨缩短的情况下保持握力。然而,掌骨缩短对掌指关节(MCP)或近端指间关节(PIP)强度的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估螺旋/斜向msf缩短超过2mm是否会影响单个手指的强度。方法:共纳入23例在螺旋/斜向MSF术后掌骨缩短大于2mm的患者。与未受伤的手相比,主要结果是MCP和PIP关节的屈曲和伸展强度。次要结果包括活动范围、握力、掌骨缩短、DASH评分、患者满意度、疼痛程度和恢复工作。结果:在握力、活动范围或MCP关节伸展方面没有观察到差异。然而,PIP关节屈伸和MCP关节屈曲明显减少。DASH评分普遍较低(平均4分,范围0-23分),患者报告无疼痛,满意度高。结论:综上所述,手指强度在统计学上显著降低,但其临床意义尚不清楚。尽管有这些发现,较低的DASH评分和较高的患者满意度表明,这些变化对大多数患者的功能影响可能是最小的。我们建议与那些高度依赖灵巧性的人讨论这些发现,比如专业音乐家或其他精密技能工作者。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信