Does osteoarthritis physiotherapy research in South Korea align with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines: a systematic review of English and Korean literature.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mi La Park, Nico Magni, Daniel W O'Brien
{"title":"Does osteoarthritis physiotherapy research in South Korea align with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines: a systematic review of English and Korean literature.","authors":"Mi La Park, Nico Magni, Daniel W O'Brien","doi":"10.1186/s41927-025-00496-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of lower limb disability worldwide, imposing significant socioeconomic and personal burden. Thus, many internationally recognised organisations have developed management guidelines for this condition. Among these, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends four first-line approaches to osteoarthritis management: education, exercise, self-management, and weight management. Despite the development of guidelines, adherence to OA management recommendations appears to be suboptimal internationally, and little is known about guideline adherence in South Korea. This study aimed to explore whether research-based physiotherapy interventions for OA in South Korea align with the NICE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple Korean and English electronic databases, including the Korea Citation Index (KCI), Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Twelve randomized controlled trials conducted in South Korea met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 60 participants. Participants' mean age ranged from 57 to 75 years, and their Body Mass Index (BMI) varied from 23.00 to 25.68 kg/m². The primary outcome measure was the alignment of interventions with NICE OA guidelines, assessed using a scoring system (0-2 points per study) developed specifically for this review. Additionally, the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studies had poor methodological quality (PEdro scale range: 3-5). Only 42% of the Korean studies aligned with the NICE OA recommendations. Commonly applied interventions were predominantly passive, such as heat therapy, electrotherapy, and kinesiology taping, none of which are recommended by NICE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A discrepancy was found between research-based physiotherapy interventions for osteoarthritis in South Korea and the therapeutic approaches recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Factors such as a lack of evidence-based education, research, healthcare funding in South Korea, and cultural health experiences and expectations of the patients may have contributed to these findings. These results could help develop new strategies for improving osteoarthritis management in South Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"9 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-025-00496-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of lower limb disability worldwide, imposing significant socioeconomic and personal burden. Thus, many internationally recognised organisations have developed management guidelines for this condition. Among these, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends four first-line approaches to osteoarthritis management: education, exercise, self-management, and weight management. Despite the development of guidelines, adherence to OA management recommendations appears to be suboptimal internationally, and little is known about guideline adherence in South Korea. This study aimed to explore whether research-based physiotherapy interventions for OA in South Korea align with the NICE guidelines.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple Korean and English electronic databases, including the Korea Citation Index (KCI), Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Twelve randomized controlled trials conducted in South Korea met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 60 participants. Participants' mean age ranged from 57 to 75 years, and their Body Mass Index (BMI) varied from 23.00 to 25.68 kg/m². The primary outcome measure was the alignment of interventions with NICE OA guidelines, assessed using a scoring system (0-2 points per study) developed specifically for this review. Additionally, the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

Results: Most studies had poor methodological quality (PEdro scale range: 3-5). Only 42% of the Korean studies aligned with the NICE OA recommendations. Commonly applied interventions were predominantly passive, such as heat therapy, electrotherapy, and kinesiology taping, none of which are recommended by NICE.

Conclusions: A discrepancy was found between research-based physiotherapy interventions for osteoarthritis in South Korea and the therapeutic approaches recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Factors such as a lack of evidence-based education, research, healthcare funding in South Korea, and cultural health experiences and expectations of the patients may have contributed to these findings. These results could help develop new strategies for improving osteoarthritis management in South Korea.

韩国的骨关节炎物理治疗研究是否符合国家健康与护理卓越研究所的指导方针:对英语和韩国文献的系统回顾。
背景:骨关节炎(OA)是世界范围内下肢残疾的主要原因,给社会经济和个人带来了巨大的负担。因此,许多国际公认的组织都针对这种情况制定了管理指南。其中,国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)推荐了四种治疗骨关节炎的一线方法:教育、运动、自我管理和体重管理。尽管制定了指南,但国际上对OA管理建议的遵守似乎不是最佳的,而且对韩国指南的遵守情况知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨韩国OA的基于研究的物理治疗干预是否符合NICE指南。方法:对韩国引文索引(KCI)、韩国学信息服务系统(KISS)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus SCOPUS、谷歌Scholar等多个韩英电子数据库进行综合检索。在韩国进行的12项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,样本量从20到60名参与者不等。参与者的平均年龄从57岁到75岁不等,他们的身体质量指数(BMI)从23.00到25.68 kg/m²不等。主要结果测量是干预措施与NICE OA指南的一致性,使用专门为本综述开发的评分系统(每项研究0-2分)进行评估。此外,采用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。结果:大多数研究的方法学质量较差(PEdro量表范围:3-5)。只有42%的韩国研究符合NICE OA的建议。通常应用的干预措施主要是被动的,如热疗法、电疗和运动机能学胶带,这些都不是NICE推荐的。结论:在韩国,基于研究的骨关节炎物理治疗干预与国家健康与护理卓越研究所推荐的治疗方法之间存在差异。韩国缺乏循证教育、研究、医疗保健资金以及患者的文化健康经验和期望等因素可能促成了这些发现。这些结果可能有助于制定改善韩国骨关节炎管理的新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信