A pilot study using eDNA collected from soil and active air samplers to detect terrestrial vertebrates in an open grassland habitat of central Queensland, Australia.
Emma L Gray, Faith M Walker, Daniel E Sanchez, Savannah J Marriott, Andrew M Baker
{"title":"A pilot study using eDNA collected from soil and active air samplers to detect terrestrial vertebrates in an open grassland habitat of central Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Emma L Gray, Faith M Walker, Daniel E Sanchez, Savannah J Marriott, Andrew M Baker","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07302-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Small mammals such as the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) may be difficult to detect using traditional trapping methods. Here, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether eDNA collected from soil and/or air could detect the presence of terrestrial vertebrates, including S. douglasi, in a semi-arid, open grassland environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Airborne eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from five sample sites (n = 7), whereas soil eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from a single site (n = 7). The Julia Creek dunnart was not detected in any of the experimental samples. However, several airborne eDNA samples did return strong matches to three terrestrial vertebrates, the long-haired rat (Rattus villosissimus), red kangaroo (Osphranter rufus) and brown quail (Synoicus ypsilophorus), all native species known to occur commonly in the study area. Overall, our preliminary findings suggest that the effectiveness of airborne and soil-derived eDNA in detecting terrestrial vertebrates was constrained by high human signal and low sampling intensity. For future studies, we recommend a number of field and lab-based refinements to increase the likelihood of detecting more taxa, particularly those that occur at low density.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07302-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Small mammals such as the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) may be difficult to detect using traditional trapping methods. Here, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether eDNA collected from soil and/or air could detect the presence of terrestrial vertebrates, including S. douglasi, in a semi-arid, open grassland environment.
Results: Airborne eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from five sample sites (n = 7), whereas soil eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from a single site (n = 7). The Julia Creek dunnart was not detected in any of the experimental samples. However, several airborne eDNA samples did return strong matches to three terrestrial vertebrates, the long-haired rat (Rattus villosissimus), red kangaroo (Osphranter rufus) and brown quail (Synoicus ypsilophorus), all native species known to occur commonly in the study area. Overall, our preliminary findings suggest that the effectiveness of airborne and soil-derived eDNA in detecting terrestrial vertebrates was constrained by high human signal and low sampling intensity. For future studies, we recommend a number of field and lab-based refinements to increase the likelihood of detecting more taxa, particularly those that occur at low density.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.