A pilot study using eDNA collected from soil and active air samplers to detect terrestrial vertebrates in an open grassland habitat of central Queensland, Australia.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Emma L Gray, Faith M Walker, Daniel E Sanchez, Savannah J Marriott, Andrew M Baker
{"title":"A pilot study using eDNA collected from soil and active air samplers to detect terrestrial vertebrates in an open grassland habitat of central Queensland, Australia.","authors":"Emma L Gray, Faith M Walker, Daniel E Sanchez, Savannah J Marriott, Andrew M Baker","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07302-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Small mammals such as the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) may be difficult to detect using traditional trapping methods. Here, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether eDNA collected from soil and/or air could detect the presence of terrestrial vertebrates, including S. douglasi, in a semi-arid, open grassland environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Airborne eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from five sample sites (n = 7), whereas soil eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from a single site (n = 7). The Julia Creek dunnart was not detected in any of the experimental samples. However, several airborne eDNA samples did return strong matches to three terrestrial vertebrates, the long-haired rat (Rattus villosissimus), red kangaroo (Osphranter rufus) and brown quail (Synoicus ypsilophorus), all native species known to occur commonly in the study area. Overall, our preliminary findings suggest that the effectiveness of airborne and soil-derived eDNA in detecting terrestrial vertebrates was constrained by high human signal and low sampling intensity. For future studies, we recommend a number of field and lab-based refinements to increase the likelihood of detecting more taxa, particularly those that occur at low density.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07302-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Small mammals such as the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) may be difficult to detect using traditional trapping methods. Here, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether eDNA collected from soil and/or air could detect the presence of terrestrial vertebrates, including S. douglasi, in a semi-arid, open grassland environment.

Results: Airborne eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from five sample sites (n = 7), whereas soil eDNA analysis returned vertebrate DNA from a single site (n = 7). The Julia Creek dunnart was not detected in any of the experimental samples. However, several airborne eDNA samples did return strong matches to three terrestrial vertebrates, the long-haired rat (Rattus villosissimus), red kangaroo (Osphranter rufus) and brown quail (Synoicus ypsilophorus), all native species known to occur commonly in the study area. Overall, our preliminary findings suggest that the effectiveness of airborne and soil-derived eDNA in detecting terrestrial vertebrates was constrained by high human signal and low sampling intensity. For future studies, we recommend a number of field and lab-based refinements to increase the likelihood of detecting more taxa, particularly those that occur at low density.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

一项试点研究,利用从土壤和活跃空气样本中收集的eDNA来检测澳大利亚昆士兰州中部开阔草原栖息地的陆生脊椎动物。
目的:用传统的诱捕方法很难捕捉到茱莉亚溪小袋鼩(sinthopsis douglasi)等小型哺乳动物。在这里,我们进行了一项初步研究,以确定从土壤和/或空气中收集的eDNA是否可以检测半干旱开放草原环境中陆生脊椎动物(包括S. douglasi)的存在。结果:航空eDNA分析从5个样本点(n = 7)中获得脊椎动物DNA,而土壤eDNA分析从单个样本点(n = 7)中获得脊椎动物DNA。Julia Creek dunnart在任何实验样本中都没有被检测到。然而,几个空气中的eDNA样本确实与三种陆生脊椎动物,长毛鼠(Rattus villosissimus),红袋鼠(Osphranter rufus)和棕色鹌鹑(Synoicus ypsilophorus),所有已知在研究地区常见的本地物种相匹配。总体而言,我们的初步研究结果表明,空气和土壤来源的eDNA检测陆生脊椎动物的有效性受到高人类信号和低采样强度的限制。对于未来的研究,我们推荐一些基于现场和实验室的改进,以增加检测更多分类群的可能性,特别是那些发生在低密度的分类群。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信