{"title":"The Transformation Experiment of Frederick Griffith II: Inclusion of Cellular Heredity for the Creation of Novel Microorganisms.","authors":"Günter A Müller","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12050532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>So far, synthetic biology approaches for the construction of artificial microorganisms have fostered the transformation of acceptor cells with genomes from donor cells. However, this strategy seems to be limited to closely related bacterial species only, due to the need for a \"fit\" between donor and acceptor proteomes and structures. \"Fitting\" of cellular regulation of metabolite fluxes and turnover between donor and acceptor cells, i.e. cybernetic heredity, may be even more difficult to achieve. The bacterial transformation experiment design 1.0, as introduced by Frederick Griffith almost one century ago, may support integration of DNA, macromolecular, topological, cybernetic and cellular heredity: (i) attenuation of donor <i>Pneumococci</i> of (S) serotype fosters release of DNA, and hypothetically of non-DNA structures compatible with subsequent transfer to and transformation of acceptor <i>Pneumococci</i> from (R) to (S) serotype; (ii) use of intact donor cells rather than of subcellular or purified fractions may guarantee maximal diversity of the structural and cybernetic matter and information transferred; (iii) \"Blending\" or mixing and fusion of donor and acceptor <i>Pneumococci</i> may occur under accompanying transfer of metabolites and regulatory circuits. A Griffith transformation experiment design 2.0 is suggested, which may enable efficient exchange of DNA as well as non-DNA structural and cybernetic matter and information, leading to unicellular hybrid microorganisms with large morphological/metabolic phenotypic differences and major features compared to predeceding cells. The prerequisites of horizontal gene and somatic cell nuclear transfer, the molecular mechanism of transformation, the machineries for the biogenesis of bacterial cytoskeleton, micelle-like complexes and membrane landscapes are briefly reviewed on the basis of underlying conceptions, ranging from Darwin's \"gemmules\" to \"stirps\", cytoplasmic and \"plasmon\" inheritance, \"rhizene agency\", \"communicology\", \"transdisciplinary membranology\" to up to Kirschner's \"facilitated variation\".</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12050532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
So far, synthetic biology approaches for the construction of artificial microorganisms have fostered the transformation of acceptor cells with genomes from donor cells. However, this strategy seems to be limited to closely related bacterial species only, due to the need for a "fit" between donor and acceptor proteomes and structures. "Fitting" of cellular regulation of metabolite fluxes and turnover between donor and acceptor cells, i.e. cybernetic heredity, may be even more difficult to achieve. The bacterial transformation experiment design 1.0, as introduced by Frederick Griffith almost one century ago, may support integration of DNA, macromolecular, topological, cybernetic and cellular heredity: (i) attenuation of donor Pneumococci of (S) serotype fosters release of DNA, and hypothetically of non-DNA structures compatible with subsequent transfer to and transformation of acceptor Pneumococci from (R) to (S) serotype; (ii) use of intact donor cells rather than of subcellular or purified fractions may guarantee maximal diversity of the structural and cybernetic matter and information transferred; (iii) "Blending" or mixing and fusion of donor and acceptor Pneumococci may occur under accompanying transfer of metabolites and regulatory circuits. A Griffith transformation experiment design 2.0 is suggested, which may enable efficient exchange of DNA as well as non-DNA structural and cybernetic matter and information, leading to unicellular hybrid microorganisms with large morphological/metabolic phenotypic differences and major features compared to predeceding cells. The prerequisites of horizontal gene and somatic cell nuclear transfer, the molecular mechanism of transformation, the machineries for the biogenesis of bacterial cytoskeleton, micelle-like complexes and membrane landscapes are briefly reviewed on the basis of underlying conceptions, ranging from Darwin's "gemmules" to "stirps", cytoplasmic and "plasmon" inheritance, "rhizene agency", "communicology", "transdisciplinary membranology" to up to Kirschner's "facilitated variation".
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering