Early Detection of Fetal Health Conditions Using Machine Learning for Classifying Imbalanced Cardiotocographic Data.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irem Nazli, Ertugrul Korbeko, Seyma Dogru, Emin Kugu, Ozgur Koray Sahingoz
{"title":"Early Detection of Fetal Health Conditions Using Machine Learning for Classifying Imbalanced Cardiotocographic Data.","authors":"Irem Nazli, Ertugrul Korbeko, Seyma Dogru, Emin Kugu, Ozgur Koray Sahingoz","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used in obstetrics to monitor fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. It helps detect early signs of fetal distress. However, manual interpretation of CTG can be time-consuming and may vary between clinicians. Recent advances in machine learning provide more efficient and consistent alternatives for analyzing CTG data. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aims to investigate the classification of fetal health using various machine learning models to facilitate early detection of fetal health conditions. <b>Methods:</b> This study utilized a tabular dataset comprising 2126 patient records and 21 features. To classify fetal health outcomes, various machine learning algorithms were employed, including CatBoost, Decision Tree, ExtraTrees, Gradient Boosting, KNN, LightGBM, Random Forest, SVM, ANN and DNN. To address class imbalance and enhance model performance, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was employed. <b>Results:</b> Among the tested models, the LightGBM algorithm achieved the highest performance, boasting a classification accuracy of 90.73% and, more notably, a balanced accuracy of 91.34%. This superior balanced accuracy highlights LightGBM's effectiveness in handling imbalanced datasets, outperforming other models in ensuring fair classification across all classes. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential of machine learning models as reliable tools for fetal health classification. The findings emphasize the transformative impact of such technologies on medical diagnostics. Additionally, the use of SMOTE effectively addressed dataset imbalance, further enhancing the reliability and applicability of the proposed approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used in obstetrics to monitor fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. It helps detect early signs of fetal distress. However, manual interpretation of CTG can be time-consuming and may vary between clinicians. Recent advances in machine learning provide more efficient and consistent alternatives for analyzing CTG data. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the classification of fetal health using various machine learning models to facilitate early detection of fetal health conditions. Methods: This study utilized a tabular dataset comprising 2126 patient records and 21 features. To classify fetal health outcomes, various machine learning algorithms were employed, including CatBoost, Decision Tree, ExtraTrees, Gradient Boosting, KNN, LightGBM, Random Forest, SVM, ANN and DNN. To address class imbalance and enhance model performance, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was employed. Results: Among the tested models, the LightGBM algorithm achieved the highest performance, boasting a classification accuracy of 90.73% and, more notably, a balanced accuracy of 91.34%. This superior balanced accuracy highlights LightGBM's effectiveness in handling imbalanced datasets, outperforming other models in ensuring fair classification across all classes. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of machine learning models as reliable tools for fetal health classification. The findings emphasize the transformative impact of such technologies on medical diagnostics. Additionally, the use of SMOTE effectively addressed dataset imbalance, further enhancing the reliability and applicability of the proposed approach.

使用机器学习分类不平衡的心脏科数据早期检测胎儿健康状况。
背景:心脏造影(CTG)广泛应用于产科监测胎儿心率和子宫收缩。它有助于发现胎儿窘迫的早期迹象。然而,CTG的人工解释可能是耗时的,并且可能因临床医生而异。机器学习的最新进展为分析CTG数据提供了更有效和一致的替代方案。目的:本研究旨在利用各种机器学习模型探讨胎儿健康的分类,以促进胎儿健康状况的早期发现。方法:本研究使用了包含2126例患者记录和21个特征的表格数据集。为了对胎儿健康结果进行分类,使用了各种机器学习算法,包括CatBoost、Decision Tree、ExtraTrees、Gradient Boosting、KNN、LightGBM、Random Forest、SVM、ANN和DNN。为了解决类不平衡问题,提高模型性能,采用了合成少数派过采样技术(SMOTE)。结果:在测试的模型中,LightGBM算法的分类准确率最高,达到90.73%,更值得注意的是,平衡准确率达到91.34%。这种优越的平衡精度突出了LightGBM在处理不平衡数据集方面的有效性,在确保所有类别的公平分类方面优于其他模型。结论:本研究强调了机器学习模型作为胎儿健康分类可靠工具的潜力。研究结果强调了这些技术对医学诊断的变革性影响。此外,SMOTE的使用有效地解决了数据集不平衡问题,进一步提高了方法的可靠性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信