Development and Validation of Polypharmacy-Related Psychological Distress Scale (PPDS): A Preliminary Study.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cheng Cheng, Xiao Chen, Junqiao Wang, Martin Christensen
{"title":"Development and Validation of Polypharmacy-Related Psychological Distress Scale (PPDS): A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Cheng Cheng, Xiao Chen, Junqiao Wang, Martin Christensen","doi":"10.3390/bs15050707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypharmacy is an increasing concern in healthcare due to its potential to cause adverse drug reactions and medication non-adherence. The evidence has identified a connection between psychological distress and polypharmacy, yet there is a lack of validated instruments to measure this specific type of distress. This study aims to develop and validate the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale. This study followed a rigorous scale development procedure, encompassing item creation, scale development, and scale evaluation. A multi-method design incorporated a literature review, the Delphi method with eight experts, and a cross-sectional survey with 97 participants. A comprehensive range of psychometric tests, including content validity, face validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, were utilized to assess the goodness of the instrument-the finalized scale comprised four items. Content validity results were deemed satisfactory based on CVI for item (I-CVI) and CVI for scale (S-CVI). Face validity was established through the incorporation of participant feedback. A significant correlation was found between the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale, with a correlation coefficient of 0.444 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The scale demonstrated acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.790 and a McDonald's omega of 0.937. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional structure. To summarize, the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale showed satisfactory reliability and validity in this preliminary study. It holds promise for use by healthcare professionals to assess psychological distress in the target population, pending further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypharmacy is an increasing concern in healthcare due to its potential to cause adverse drug reactions and medication non-adherence. The evidence has identified a connection between psychological distress and polypharmacy, yet there is a lack of validated instruments to measure this specific type of distress. This study aims to develop and validate the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale. This study followed a rigorous scale development procedure, encompassing item creation, scale development, and scale evaluation. A multi-method design incorporated a literature review, the Delphi method with eight experts, and a cross-sectional survey with 97 participants. A comprehensive range of psychometric tests, including content validity, face validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, were utilized to assess the goodness of the instrument-the finalized scale comprised four items. Content validity results were deemed satisfactory based on CVI for item (I-CVI) and CVI for scale (S-CVI). Face validity was established through the incorporation of participant feedback. A significant correlation was found between the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale, with a correlation coefficient of 0.444 (p < 0.001). The scale demonstrated acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.790 and a McDonald's omega of 0.937. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional structure. To summarize, the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale showed satisfactory reliability and validity in this preliminary study. It holds promise for use by healthcare professionals to assess psychological distress in the target population, pending further validation.

多药相关心理困扰量表(PPDS)的编制与验证:初步研究。
由于可能引起药物不良反应和药物不依从性,多种用药在医疗保健中日益受到关注。有证据表明,心理困扰和多种用药之间存在联系,但缺乏有效的工具来衡量这种特定类型的困扰。本研究旨在编制并验证《多药相关心理困扰量表》。本研究遵循严格的量表开发程序,包括项目创建、量表开发和量表评估。多方法设计包括文献综述、8位专家的德尔菲法和97位参与者的横断面调查。采用内容效度、面孔效度、并发效度、内部一致性和结构效度等一系列心理测试来评估量表的优劣,最终量表由四个项目组成。以项目CVI (I-CVI)和量表CVI (S-CVI)为基础,认为内容效度结果满意。面孔效度是通过纳入被试反馈来建立的。《患者健康问卷-4》与《多药相关心理困扰量表》存在显著相关,相关系数为0.444 (p < 0.001)。量表具有可接受的信度,Cronbach's alpha为0.790,McDonald's omega为0.937。验证性因子分析显示单维结构。综上所述,多药相关心理困扰量表在本初步研究中显示出令人满意的信度和效度。它有希望被医疗保健专业人员用于评估目标人群的心理困扰,有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信