Combining Steroid Plus 5-Fluorouracil Injection with Radiotherapy Versus Injection Alone for Keloids: A 4-Year Retrospective Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Beiyi Wu, Bohan Zhang, Haitao Xiao, Xuewen Xu
{"title":"Combining Steroid Plus 5-Fluorouracil Injection with Radiotherapy Versus Injection Alone for Keloids: A 4-Year Retrospective Study.","authors":"Beiyi Wu, Bohan Zhang, Haitao Xiao, Xuewen Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04927-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Keloid management has been debated for decades due to unsatisfactory outcomes and high recurrence rates. Intralesional injection and radiotherapy are prominent nonsurgical interventions for keloids. However, monotherapies for keloids usually yield poor efficacy and cause patient burden due to additional treatment sessions and side effects, affecting adherence. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection with electron beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy compared to intralesional TAC+5-FU injection alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who were initially treated between 2019 and 2022 and followed for more than 12 months. The baseline condition, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), recurrence, symptoms, follow-up period, and patient self-assessment were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a cohort of 100 eligible patients with a total of 111 keloids. Seventy-one of patients received the combined therapy and 29 received TAC+5-FU injection only. The results revealed that combining injection with radiotherapy reduced the recurrence rate and improved symptoms such as pruritus and pain while posing minimal extra risk of side effects. Moreover, patients receiving combined therapy assessed treatment outcomes more positively than those solely receiving injection therapy. Other factors that related to increased risk of recurrence included a higher VSS score at the end of treatment and the presence of keloid family history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined schedule of intralesional TAC+5-FU injection with radiotherapy could effectively reduce the recurrence rate and alleviate symptoms of keloids.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04927-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Keloid management has been debated for decades due to unsatisfactory outcomes and high recurrence rates. Intralesional injection and radiotherapy are prominent nonsurgical interventions for keloids. However, monotherapies for keloids usually yield poor efficacy and cause patient burden due to additional treatment sessions and side effects, affecting adherence. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection with electron beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy compared to intralesional TAC+5-FU injection alone.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who were initially treated between 2019 and 2022 and followed for more than 12 months. The baseline condition, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), recurrence, symptoms, follow-up period, and patient self-assessment were recorded.

Results: The study included a cohort of 100 eligible patients with a total of 111 keloids. Seventy-one of patients received the combined therapy and 29 received TAC+5-FU injection only. The results revealed that combining injection with radiotherapy reduced the recurrence rate and improved symptoms such as pruritus and pain while posing minimal extra risk of side effects. Moreover, patients receiving combined therapy assessed treatment outcomes more positively than those solely receiving injection therapy. Other factors that related to increased risk of recurrence included a higher VSS score at the end of treatment and the presence of keloid family history.

Conclusions: The combined schedule of intralesional TAC+5-FU injection with radiotherapy could effectively reduce the recurrence rate and alleviate symptoms of keloids.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

类固醇加5-氟尿嘧啶注射联合放疗治疗瘢痕疙瘩:一项4年回顾性研究。
背景:瘢痕疙瘩的治疗由于效果不理想和复发率高而争论了几十年。病灶内注射和放疗是治疗瘢痕疙瘩的主要非手术手段。然而,瘢痕疙瘩的单一治疗通常效果不佳,并且由于额外的治疗时间和副作用导致患者负担,影响依从性。本研究旨在评价局部注射曲安奈德(TAC) +5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合电子束放疗或近距离治疗的安全性和有效性,并与单独注射局部注射TAC+5-FU进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2022年首次治疗的患者,随访时间超过12个月。记录基线情况、温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)、复发率、症状、随访时间和患者自我评价。结果:该研究纳入了100名符合条件的患者,共111例瘢痕疙瘩。71例患者接受联合治疗,29例患者仅接受TAC+5-FU注射。结果显示,注射与放疗相结合降低了复发率,改善了瘙痒和疼痛等症状,同时将额外的副作用风险降到最低。此外,接受联合治疗的患者比单独接受注射治疗的患者更积极地评估治疗结果。与复发风险增加相关的其他因素包括治疗结束时较高的VSS评分和瘢痕疙瘩家族史的存在。结论:病灶内注射TAC+5-FU联合放疗可有效降低瘢痕疙瘩复发率,缓解瘢痕疙瘩症状。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信