Predicting working memory efficiency across adulthood: the role of enhancement and suppression attentional mechanisms, moderated by age and other factors.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elissa López-González, Ulises Caballero-Sánchez, Ixchel Gómez-González, Mónica Méndez-Díaz, Oscar E Prospéro-García, Alejandra E Ruiz-Contreras
{"title":"Predicting working memory efficiency across adulthood: the role of enhancement and suppression attentional mechanisms, moderated by age and other factors.","authors":"Elissa López-González, Ulises Caballero-Sánchez, Ixchel Gómez-González, Mónica Méndez-Díaz, Oscar E Prospéro-García, Alejandra E Ruiz-Contreras","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03059-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global population of individuals aged 60 years and older now exceeds one billion and continues to grow, underscoring the necessity of addressing cognitive challenges associated with aging. The present study aimed to evaluate the enhancement and suppression of attentional mechanisms, as well as working memory efficiency (WME), across the adult lifespan. Additionally, it examined factors that may moderate these relationships. A total of 194 participants, aged between 20 and 80 years, completed questionnaires and participated in an experimental task designed to assess attentional mechanisms and WME. The results indicated that both enhancement and suppression mechanisms remained stable throughout adulthood; however, WME showed a decline with increasing age. Notwithstanding, several moderating variables influenced these outcomes. Cognitive reserve and current cognitive functioning were found to be positive predictors of WME, whereas depression and anxiety exerted negative effects. Furthermore, a low level of cognitive reserve uniquely predicted diminished suppression of irrelevant information with advancing age. WME was consistently lower across all ages among participants with high levels of depression, in contrast to those with low or moderate levels, in whom WME followed the expected age-related trajectory. Additionally, elevated anxiety levels and an average sleep duration of five hours were associated with reduced WME, particularly in relation to the enhancement mechanism. Conversely, low levels of depression were linked to improved WME via the enhancement mechanism. These findings underscore the importance of moderating factors that may mitigate cognitive decline or support cognitive functioning throughout the aging process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03059-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global population of individuals aged 60 years and older now exceeds one billion and continues to grow, underscoring the necessity of addressing cognitive challenges associated with aging. The present study aimed to evaluate the enhancement and suppression of attentional mechanisms, as well as working memory efficiency (WME), across the adult lifespan. Additionally, it examined factors that may moderate these relationships. A total of 194 participants, aged between 20 and 80 years, completed questionnaires and participated in an experimental task designed to assess attentional mechanisms and WME. The results indicated that both enhancement and suppression mechanisms remained stable throughout adulthood; however, WME showed a decline with increasing age. Notwithstanding, several moderating variables influenced these outcomes. Cognitive reserve and current cognitive functioning were found to be positive predictors of WME, whereas depression and anxiety exerted negative effects. Furthermore, a low level of cognitive reserve uniquely predicted diminished suppression of irrelevant information with advancing age. WME was consistently lower across all ages among participants with high levels of depression, in contrast to those with low or moderate levels, in whom WME followed the expected age-related trajectory. Additionally, elevated anxiety levels and an average sleep duration of five hours were associated with reduced WME, particularly in relation to the enhancement mechanism. Conversely, low levels of depression were linked to improved WME via the enhancement mechanism. These findings underscore the importance of moderating factors that may mitigate cognitive decline or support cognitive functioning throughout the aging process.

预测成年期的工作记忆效率:由年龄和其他因素调节的增强和抑制注意机制的作用。
全球60岁及以上人口现已超过10亿,并且还在继续增长,这凸显了解决与老龄化相关的认知挑战的必要性。本研究旨在评估成人一生中注意机制的增强和抑制,以及工作记忆效率(WME)。此外,它还研究了可能缓和这些关系的因素。194名年龄在20至80岁之间的参与者完成了问卷调查,并参与了一项旨在评估注意力机制和WME的实验任务。结果表明,增强和抑制机制在整个成年期保持稳定;WME随年龄增长呈下降趋势。尽管如此,几个调节变量影响了这些结果。认知储备和当前认知功能是WME的正向预测因子,而抑郁和焦虑具有负向影响。此外,低水平的认知储备独特地预测了随着年龄的增长,对无关信息的抑制减弱。在所有年龄段中,重度抑郁症患者的WME一直较低,而轻度或中度抑郁症患者的WME则遵循预期的年龄相关轨迹。此外,焦虑水平升高和平均睡眠时间为5小时与WME减少有关,特别是与增强机制有关。相反,低水平的抑郁通过增强机制与WME的改善有关。这些发现强调了在整个衰老过程中可能减轻认知衰退或支持认知功能的调节因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信