Discrepancies Between Recommendations in Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Obesity in Adolescents and Adults: An Evidence Map.

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1111/obr.13945
Jana Brauchmann, Luise Laudenbach, Philipp Kapp, Kathrin Grummich, Julia Lischka, Nicole Vanersa, Edrienny Patricia Alves Accioly Rocha, Gundula Ernst, Joerg J Meerpohl, Antje Tannen, Daniel Weghuber, Susann Weihrauch-Blüher, Susanna Wiegand, Gabriel Torbahn
{"title":"Discrepancies Between Recommendations in Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Obesity in Adolescents and Adults: An Evidence Map.","authors":"Jana Brauchmann, Luise Laudenbach, Philipp Kapp, Kathrin Grummich, Julia Lischka, Nicole Vanersa, Edrienny Patricia Alves Accioly Rocha, Gundula Ernst, Joerg J Meerpohl, Antje Tannen, Daniel Weghuber, Susann Weihrauch-Blüher, Susanna Wiegand, Gabriel Torbahn","doi":"10.1111/obr.13945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of this evidence map is to provide a systematic overview of evidence-based guidelines for the management of obesity and to highlight discrepancies between recommendations for the pediatric and adult populations. Knowing about these discrepancies may be relevant during the transition from pediatrics to adult healthcare to enable a structured, successful transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used two already existing guideline synopses of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care as a basis and additionally searched Embase and Medline as well as guideline portals for creating a systematic overview of evidence-based pediatric and adult guidelines on obesity management. The quality of the identified guidelines was assessed using AGREE II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine guidelines (published 08/2017 to 08/2023), containing 1248 recommendations, were included in the review and allocated to nine different healthcare categories. Discrepancies between the pediatric and adult populations were mainly identified in diagnostics and health behavior lifestyle treatment. Gaps were found in recommendations for bariatric surgery, pharmacotherapy, and emergency (-contraception).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unique characteristics of adolescence are insufficiently addressed in current evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, healthcare professionals may benefit from considering the discrepancies and gaps identified in this review when providing recommendations during the transition of healthcare for this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13945"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this evidence map is to provide a systematic overview of evidence-based guidelines for the management of obesity and to highlight discrepancies between recommendations for the pediatric and adult populations. Knowing about these discrepancies may be relevant during the transition from pediatrics to adult healthcare to enable a structured, successful transfer.

Methods: We used two already existing guideline synopses of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care as a basis and additionally searched Embase and Medline as well as guideline portals for creating a systematic overview of evidence-based pediatric and adult guidelines on obesity management. The quality of the identified guidelines was assessed using AGREE II.

Results: Thirty-nine guidelines (published 08/2017 to 08/2023), containing 1248 recommendations, were included in the review and allocated to nine different healthcare categories. Discrepancies between the pediatric and adult populations were mainly identified in diagnostics and health behavior lifestyle treatment. Gaps were found in recommendations for bariatric surgery, pharmacotherapy, and emergency (-contraception).

Conclusion: The unique characteristics of adolescence are insufficiently addressed in current evidence-based guidelines. Therefore, healthcare professionals may benefit from considering the discrepancies and gaps identified in this review when providing recommendations during the transition of healthcare for this age group.

青少年和成人肥胖管理循证指南中建议的差异:证据图。
背景/目的:本证据图的目的是为肥胖管理提供基于证据的指南的系统概述,并强调儿科和成人人群建议之间的差异。了解这些差异可能是相关的,从儿科过渡到成人医疗保健,以实现一个结构化的,成功的转移。方法:我们使用卫生保健质量和效率研究所已有的两份指南概要作为基础,并额外检索Embase和Medline以及指南门户网站,以创建基于证据的儿童和成人肥胖管理指南的系统概述。使用AGREE II评估已确定指南的质量。结果:39份指南(发布于2017年8月至2023年8月),包含1248条建议,被纳入综述,并被分配到9个不同的医疗保健类别。儿童和成人之间的差异主要体现在诊断和健康行为生活方式治疗方面。在减肥手术、药物治疗和紧急(避孕)方面的建议存在差距。结论:目前的循证指南没有充分解决青少年的独特特征。因此,医疗保健专业人员在为该年龄组的医疗保健过渡提供建议时,可能会从考虑本综述中确定的差异和差距中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信