Study of the application of the deformed dose summation (DDS) method in brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer and analysis of regional dosing in recurrent cervical cancer
Hongling Xie , Jiping Liu , Long Sun , Tieming Xie
{"title":"Study of the application of the deformed dose summation (DDS) method in brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer and analysis of regional dosing in recurrent cervical cancer","authors":"Hongling Xie , Jiping Liu , Long Sun , Tieming Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluated the cumulative brachytherapy (BT) dose in cervical cancer using different methods and explored using deformed dose summation (DDS) techniques for assessing doses to targets and organs at risk (OAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 41 patients with cervical cancer who underwent BT were retrospectively analyzed, the cumulative dose, measured as the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, was calculated using dose–volume histogram (DVH) superposition and DDS methods. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JC), and mean distance to agreement (MDA) were utilized to evaluate the deformable image registration (DIR) accuracy. Furthermore, the difference between the target and OAR doses obtained through the two methods was calculated and compared. The Spearman method was employed to analyze dose differences and geometric correlations, comparing the dose in the relapsing area with that in the post-fusion high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) in patients experiencing relapse to identify potential associations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In evaluating deformable registration, the registration outcomes for both the bladder and rectum were deemed satisfactory. The DSC, JC, and MDA values for the bladder and rectum were calculated as follows: 0.89 ± 0.07, 0.81 ± 0.09, 2.14 ± 1.44 mm and 0.80 ± 0.08, 0.67 ± 0.10, 2.28 ± 1.80 mm, respectively. Compared to DVH superposition, DDS techniques reduced the average cumulative doses of the D2cc and D0.1 cc of bladder by 11.4 % and 8.2 %, respectively; and the doses of the D2cc and D0.1 cc of rectum to be decreased by 9.7 % and 14.1 %, respectively. Additionally, the D90 of HR-CTV and Intermediate risk CTV (IR-CTV) were reduced by 6.60 ± 3.70 Gy and 4.55 ± 2.70 Gy, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between DSC, JC, and MDA and the dose difference. No correlation was observed between the relapsing regional dose and the dose parameters related to the HRCTV following fusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Calculating the cumulative dose using DVH parameters is a conservative approach that may limit target dose enhancement. During planning, DIR can guide clinicians in selecting the target dose and visually display the cumulative dose distribution in the cervical target area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8096,"journal":{"name":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 111945"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804325002908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluated the cumulative brachytherapy (BT) dose in cervical cancer using different methods and explored using deformed dose summation (DDS) techniques for assessing doses to targets and organs at risk (OAR).
Methods
A total of 41 patients with cervical cancer who underwent BT were retrospectively analyzed, the cumulative dose, measured as the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, was calculated using dose–volume histogram (DVH) superposition and DDS methods. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JC), and mean distance to agreement (MDA) were utilized to evaluate the deformable image registration (DIR) accuracy. Furthermore, the difference between the target and OAR doses obtained through the two methods was calculated and compared. The Spearman method was employed to analyze dose differences and geometric correlations, comparing the dose in the relapsing area with that in the post-fusion high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) in patients experiencing relapse to identify potential associations.
Results
In evaluating deformable registration, the registration outcomes for both the bladder and rectum were deemed satisfactory. The DSC, JC, and MDA values for the bladder and rectum were calculated as follows: 0.89 ± 0.07, 0.81 ± 0.09, 2.14 ± 1.44 mm and 0.80 ± 0.08, 0.67 ± 0.10, 2.28 ± 1.80 mm, respectively. Compared to DVH superposition, DDS techniques reduced the average cumulative doses of the D2cc and D0.1 cc of bladder by 11.4 % and 8.2 %, respectively; and the doses of the D2cc and D0.1 cc of rectum to be decreased by 9.7 % and 14.1 %, respectively. Additionally, the D90 of HR-CTV and Intermediate risk CTV (IR-CTV) were reduced by 6.60 ± 3.70 Gy and 4.55 ± 2.70 Gy, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between DSC, JC, and MDA and the dose difference. No correlation was observed between the relapsing regional dose and the dose parameters related to the HRCTV following fusion.
Conclusions
Calculating the cumulative dose using DVH parameters is a conservative approach that may limit target dose enhancement. During planning, DIR can guide clinicians in selecting the target dose and visually display the cumulative dose distribution in the cervical target area.
期刊介绍:
Applied Radiation and Isotopes provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and peaceful application of nuclear, radiation and radionuclide techniques in chemistry, physics, biochemistry, biology, medicine, security, engineering and in the earth, planetary and environmental sciences, all including dosimetry. Nuclear techniques are defined in the broadest sense and both experimental and theoretical papers are welcome. They include the development and use of α- and β-particles, X-rays and γ-rays, neutrons and other nuclear particles and radiations from all sources, including radionuclides, synchrotron sources, cyclotrons and reactors and from the natural environment.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria.
Papers dealing with radiation processing, i.e., where radiation is used to bring about a biological, chemical or physical change in a material, should be directed to our sister journal Radiation Physics and Chemistry.