Guifeng Li , Mengya Li , Xin Xu , Junhong Zhang , Qifang Li , Qing Cai
{"title":"Inpatient vs outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial","authors":"Guifeng Li , Mengya Li , Xin Xu , Junhong Zhang , Qifang Li , Qing Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>While outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) represents the most efficacious delivery method, approximately 50 % of patients are unable to achieve clinical remission. There is a pressing need to develop more effective approaches to CBT-I delivery. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of one-week inpatient CBT-I and eight-week standard outpatient CBT-I.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 200 adults with chronic insomnia disorder. These participants were randomly allocated to either the inpatient group (<em>n</em> = 100) or the outpatient group (n = 100). The inpatient group underwent a one-week intensive inpatient CBT-I followed by weekly follow-ups program. The outpatient group participated in a standard outpatient CBT-I program conducted on an individual basis over an eight-week period. The primary outcome was the insomnia severity index score at 9 weeks after the start of intervention. Linear mixed effects model was employed for the intention-to-treat analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the 9-week assessment, the inpatient CBT-I group demonstrated a mean change in insomnia severity index score of −13.31 (95 % confidence interval [CI], −14.47 to −12.16; Cohen's <em>d =</em> −3.18; <em>P</em> < .001). The outpatient group showed a mean change of −11.14 (95 % CI, −12.30 to −9.98; Cohen's <em>d</em> = −2.66; <em>P</em> < .001). The mean difference between groups was −2.03 (95 % CI, −3.21 to −0.85; Cohen's <em>d</em> = −0.48; <em>P</em> < .001), indicating a statistically significant improvement in the inpatient group compared to the outpatient group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated that inpatient CBT-I exhibited superior efficacy compared to outpatient CBT-I in alleviating insomnia severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 152609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X25000379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
While outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) represents the most efficacious delivery method, approximately 50 % of patients are unable to achieve clinical remission. There is a pressing need to develop more effective approaches to CBT-I delivery. This study assessed the comparative efficacy of one-week inpatient CBT-I and eight-week standard outpatient CBT-I.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 200 adults with chronic insomnia disorder. These participants were randomly allocated to either the inpatient group (n = 100) or the outpatient group (n = 100). The inpatient group underwent a one-week intensive inpatient CBT-I followed by weekly follow-ups program. The outpatient group participated in a standard outpatient CBT-I program conducted on an individual basis over an eight-week period. The primary outcome was the insomnia severity index score at 9 weeks after the start of intervention. Linear mixed effects model was employed for the intention-to-treat analysis.
Results
At the 9-week assessment, the inpatient CBT-I group demonstrated a mean change in insomnia severity index score of −13.31 (95 % confidence interval [CI], −14.47 to −12.16; Cohen's d = −3.18; P < .001). The outpatient group showed a mean change of −11.14 (95 % CI, −12.30 to −9.98; Cohen's d = −2.66; P < .001). The mean difference between groups was −2.03 (95 % CI, −3.21 to −0.85; Cohen's d = −0.48; P < .001), indicating a statistically significant improvement in the inpatient group compared to the outpatient group.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that inpatient CBT-I exhibited superior efficacy compared to outpatient CBT-I in alleviating insomnia severity.
期刊介绍:
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology.
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.