Rapid risk assessment of multiple buffeting performance levels for long-span bridges

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ruiqing Han , Teng Wu
{"title":"Rapid risk assessment of multiple buffeting performance levels for long-span bridges","authors":"Ruiqing Han ,&nbsp;Teng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The wind-sensitive long-span bridges under buffeting loads are currently designed to be limited to linear, elastic behavior but may present unfavorable performance in terms of driving/pedestrian comfort. Furthermore, the lack of consideration on global climate change (with intensified windstorms) and local thermodynamics process (with energetic convective turbulence) in design wind loads may lead to nonlinear, inelastic behaviors of existing bridges associated with various damage levels to structural components (e.g., negligible, repairable, or severe damage states). Accordingly, rapid risk assessment of long-span bridge buffeting performance at multiple levels is needed. To this end, a closed-form solution is developed in this study by convolving the wind hazard function (fitted as a polynomial curve) with the structural fragility function (fitted as a lognormal curve) for risk evaluation with high efficiency. The Sutong Yangtze River Bridge is utilized as a case study for rapid risk (probability of damage) assessment of structural components (e.g., bridge deck, tower, and stay cable) under buffeting loads based on the proposed closed-form solution. To verify the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach, the buffeting risks calculated by the closed-form solution are compared with those obtained through the Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, parameter sensitivity analyses are conducted to reveal the important effects of the uncertainties related to wind fields, aerodynamic characteristics, and structural properties on the long-span bridge buffeting risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 106128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525001242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The wind-sensitive long-span bridges under buffeting loads are currently designed to be limited to linear, elastic behavior but may present unfavorable performance in terms of driving/pedestrian comfort. Furthermore, the lack of consideration on global climate change (with intensified windstorms) and local thermodynamics process (with energetic convective turbulence) in design wind loads may lead to nonlinear, inelastic behaviors of existing bridges associated with various damage levels to structural components (e.g., negligible, repairable, or severe damage states). Accordingly, rapid risk assessment of long-span bridge buffeting performance at multiple levels is needed. To this end, a closed-form solution is developed in this study by convolving the wind hazard function (fitted as a polynomial curve) with the structural fragility function (fitted as a lognormal curve) for risk evaluation with high efficiency. The Sutong Yangtze River Bridge is utilized as a case study for rapid risk (probability of damage) assessment of structural components (e.g., bridge deck, tower, and stay cable) under buffeting loads based on the proposed closed-form solution. To verify the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach, the buffeting risks calculated by the closed-form solution are compared with those obtained through the Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, parameter sensitivity analyses are conducted to reveal the important effects of the uncertainties related to wind fields, aerodynamic characteristics, and structural properties on the long-span bridge buffeting risks.
大跨度桥梁多抖振性能水平的快速风险评估
在抖振荷载作用下的风敏大跨度桥梁目前的设计仅限于线性、弹性行为,但可能在驾驶/行人舒适度方面表现出不利的性能。此外,在设计风荷载时,缺乏对全球气候变化(风暴加剧)和局部热力学过程(有高能对流湍流)的考虑,可能导致现有桥梁的非线性、非弹性行为,这些行为与结构部件的各种损伤水平(例如,可忽略、可修复或严重损伤状态)有关。因此,需要对大跨度桥梁的抖振性能进行多层次的快速风险评估。为此,本研究将风危害函数(拟合为多项式曲线)与结构易损性函数(拟合为对数正态曲线)进行卷积,得到了一种封闭型解,可高效地进行风险评估。以苏通长江大桥为例,基于所提出的闭式解,对振振荷载作用下的结构构件(如桥面、塔架、斜拉索)进行快速风险(损伤概率)评估。为了验证该方法的有效性和准确性,将封闭解计算的抖振风险与蒙特卡罗模拟结果进行了比较。最后进行了参数敏感性分析,揭示了风场、气动特性和结构特性等不确定性因素对大跨度桥梁抖振风险的重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信