Lixing Zhang , Gang Guo , Zhenbo Tong , Ya Zhang , Aibing Yu , Changhui Li
{"title":"Comparative CFD study on regional drug deposition of Breezhaler® and Handihaler® in the human respiratory tract","authors":"Lixing Zhang , Gang Guo , Zhenbo Tong , Ya Zhang , Aibing Yu , Changhui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.apt.2025.104935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inhalation therapy has become a cornerstone in the management of chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Among various devices, Breezhaler® and Handihaler® are two widely used dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in clinical practice. However, due to differences in structural design and aerodynamic characteristics, these devices exhibit markedly different drug deposition patterns within the respiratory tract. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive comparative studies investigating their deposition efficiency and underlying mechanisms across distinct regions of the airway. To address this gap, the present study employs CFD-DPM approach to evaluate and compare the deposition and distribution behavior of Breezhaler® and Handihaler® in the MT, TB, and deep lung regions under five pressure drop levels and four particle size conditions. The results indicate that Breezhaler® features a more streamlined internal structure, allowing the airflow to maintain higher and more uniform velocities. In contrast, Handihaler® generates lower overall airflow speeds and exhibits greater velocity gradients and localized turbulence within the oral cavity. For both devices, oral deposition rates increase with rising pressure drops and particle sizes, with Handihaler® consistently showing higher oral deposition, particularly under elevated flow and particle size conditions. In the TB region, Breezhaler® demonstrates superior deposition efficiency compared to Handihaler®. Enhancing TB deposition with Breezhaler® can be achieved by utilizing smaller particle sizes, while Handihaler® can improve TB deposition efficiency even with larger particles by operating under lower pressure drops. Furthermore, Handihaler® shows better performance in drug delivery to the deep lung region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7232,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Powder Technology","volume":"36 7","pages":"Article 104935"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Powder Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921883125001566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inhalation therapy has become a cornerstone in the management of chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Among various devices, Breezhaler® and Handihaler® are two widely used dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in clinical practice. However, due to differences in structural design and aerodynamic characteristics, these devices exhibit markedly different drug deposition patterns within the respiratory tract. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive comparative studies investigating their deposition efficiency and underlying mechanisms across distinct regions of the airway. To address this gap, the present study employs CFD-DPM approach to evaluate and compare the deposition and distribution behavior of Breezhaler® and Handihaler® in the MT, TB, and deep lung regions under five pressure drop levels and four particle size conditions. The results indicate that Breezhaler® features a more streamlined internal structure, allowing the airflow to maintain higher and more uniform velocities. In contrast, Handihaler® generates lower overall airflow speeds and exhibits greater velocity gradients and localized turbulence within the oral cavity. For both devices, oral deposition rates increase with rising pressure drops and particle sizes, with Handihaler® consistently showing higher oral deposition, particularly under elevated flow and particle size conditions. In the TB region, Breezhaler® demonstrates superior deposition efficiency compared to Handihaler®. Enhancing TB deposition with Breezhaler® can be achieved by utilizing smaller particle sizes, while Handihaler® can improve TB deposition efficiency even with larger particles by operating under lower pressure drops. Furthermore, Handihaler® shows better performance in drug delivery to the deep lung region.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Advanced Powder Technology is to meet the demand for an international journal that integrates all aspects of science and technology research on powder and particulate materials. The journal fulfills this purpose by publishing original research papers, rapid communications, reviews, and translated articles by prominent researchers worldwide.
The editorial work of Advanced Powder Technology, which was founded as the International Journal of the Society of Powder Technology, Japan, is now shared by distinguished board members, who operate in a unique framework designed to respond to the increasing global demand for articles on not only powder and particles, but also on various materials produced from them.
Advanced Powder Technology covers various areas, but a discussion of powder and particles is required in articles. Topics include: Production of powder and particulate materials in gases and liquids(nanoparticles, fine ceramics, pharmaceuticals, novel functional materials, etc.); Aerosol and colloidal processing; Powder and particle characterization; Dynamics and phenomena; Calculation and simulation (CFD, DEM, Monte Carlo method, population balance, etc.); Measurement and control of powder processes; Particle modification; Comminution; Powder handling and operations (storage, transport, granulation, separation, fluidization, etc.)