{"title":"Of all shapes and sizes: a theoretical framework for animal-mediated terrestrial heterogeneity across scales","authors":"Kristy M. Ferraro, Janey R. Lienau","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animals redistribute elements throughout their lives by depositing wastes and carcasses. Growing evidence shows that these zoogeochemical processes enhance landscape diversity and heterogeneity worldwide. We provide a descriptive framework for understanding how direct animal depositions (i.e. fecal matter, urine, carcasses, and other body materials) contribute to element heterogeneity across scales, with particular focus on how a species' contributions differ relative to one another. In this framework, we identify mean body mass and population density as the main predictors of element heterogeneity. Secondary predictors, including population strategy, overabundance, habitat preference, elemental composition and predation, are nested within and influenced by body size and density. We then demonstrate how animals can play unique roles within communities, leading to multiscale patterns of elemental heterogeneity within an ecosystem. In doing so, we highlight the importance of studying zoogeochemistry through both an ecosystem ecology and community ecology lens. We illustrate our framework using three spatial scales of animal communities (100 cm<sup>2</sup>, 100 m<sup>2</sup>, 100 km<sup>2</sup>) within an eastern temperate forest, considering both individual species traits and their community interactions at each scale. The community heterogeneity framework provides a theoretical understanding of how individual species and animal communities collectively drive element heterogeneity, allowing a predictive mechanism for the ecosystem contributions of animals across systems and scales.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Animals redistribute elements throughout their lives by depositing wastes and carcasses. Growing evidence shows that these zoogeochemical processes enhance landscape diversity and heterogeneity worldwide. We provide a descriptive framework for understanding how direct animal depositions (i.e. fecal matter, urine, carcasses, and other body materials) contribute to element heterogeneity across scales, with particular focus on how a species' contributions differ relative to one another. In this framework, we identify mean body mass and population density as the main predictors of element heterogeneity. Secondary predictors, including population strategy, overabundance, habitat preference, elemental composition and predation, are nested within and influenced by body size and density. We then demonstrate how animals can play unique roles within communities, leading to multiscale patterns of elemental heterogeneity within an ecosystem. In doing so, we highlight the importance of studying zoogeochemistry through both an ecosystem ecology and community ecology lens. We illustrate our framework using three spatial scales of animal communities (100 cm2, 100 m2, 100 km2) within an eastern temperate forest, considering both individual species traits and their community interactions at each scale. The community heterogeneity framework provides a theoretical understanding of how individual species and animal communities collectively drive element heterogeneity, allowing a predictive mechanism for the ecosystem contributions of animals across systems and scales.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.