Prime editing outperforms homology-directed repair as a tool for CRISPR-mediated variant knock-in in zebrafish

Abstract

Zebrafish serve as a valuable model organism for studying human genetic diseases. While generating knockout lines is relatively straightforward, introducing precise disease-specific genetic variants by knock-in (KI) remains challenging. KI lines, however, enable more accurate studies of molecular and physiological consequences of genetic diseases. Their generation is often hampered by low editing efficiency (EE) and potential off-target effects. Here, we optimized conventional CRISPR–Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) strategies for precise KI of genetic variants in zebrafish and compared their efficacy with prime editing, a recently developed technique that is not yet commonly used. Using next-generation sequencing, we determined KI EE by HDR for six unique base-pair substitutions in three different zebrafish genes. We assessed the effect of (1) varying Cas9 amounts, (2) HDR templates with chemical modifications to improve integration efficiency, (3) different microinjection procedures and (4) introduction of additional synonymous guide-blocking variants in the HDR template. Increasing Cas9 amounts augmented KI EE, with optimal injected amounts of Cas9 between 200 pg and 800 pg. The use of Alt-R HDR templates further increased KI EE, while guide-blocking modifications did not. Injecting components directly into the cell was not superior to injections into the yolk. Prime editing, however, increased EE up to fourfold and expanded the F₀ founder pool for four targets compared with conventional HDR editing, with fewer off-target effects. Therefore, prime editing is a very promising methodology for improving the creation of precise genomic edits in zebrafish, facilitating the modeling of human diseases.