Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1.

Guilherme Lima, Marlon Cesar Souza-Filho, Luiz Oliveira-Junior, Daniel Paiva, Roger Schmidt Brock, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
{"title":"Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1.","authors":"Guilherme Lima, Marlon Cesar Souza-Filho, Luiz Oliveira-Junior, Daniel Paiva, Roger Schmidt Brock, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47107-24.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) as a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tool and identify the cutoffs of CCOS-PROM and EuroQoL-5D-3L score index (EQ-SI) against Gestalt in adults who underwent chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed the health status of CM1 adults after a 12-month surgery follow-up. An electronic form was sent to groups of CM patients. The self-Gestalt good perception was distributed as a cure or improvement for validation purposes. AUROC was evaluated to verify the ability of each PROM to predict Gestalt outcomes. Ethical approval registry: 64148822.0.0000.5292.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 85 subjects had a mean age of 42.1(±10.6) years and a follow-up of 4.8(±4.1) years. Gestalt outcome was good for 23(27%) patients. The median CCOS-PROM of 74 patients was 11(IQR 4). The median EQ-SI of 84 patients was 0.52(IQR 0.29). CCOS-PROM score of 13 was the optimal cutoff value (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 78.4%). For EQ-SI, this value was 0.64 (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 75.4%). The AUROC for CCOS-PROM and EQ-SI were 0.90 and 0.86, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCOS-PROM is valid for assessing the outcome of CM1 surgery in adults. CCOS-PROM score of 13 and EQ-SI of 0.64 were the best tradeoff values.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"503-511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47107-24.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) as a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tool and identify the cutoffs of CCOS-PROM and EuroQoL-5D-3L score index (EQ-SI) against Gestalt in adults who underwent chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) treatment.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the health status of CM1 adults after a 12-month surgery follow-up. An electronic form was sent to groups of CM patients. The self-Gestalt good perception was distributed as a cure or improvement for validation purposes. AUROC was evaluated to verify the ability of each PROM to predict Gestalt outcomes. Ethical approval registry: 64148822.0.0000.5292.

Results: The 85 subjects had a mean age of 42.1(±10.6) years and a follow-up of 4.8(±4.1) years. Gestalt outcome was good for 23(27%) patients. The median CCOS-PROM of 74 patients was 11(IQR 4). The median EQ-SI of 84 patients was 0.52(IQR 0.29). CCOS-PROM score of 13 was the optimal cutoff value (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 78.4%). For EQ-SI, this value was 0.64 (sensitivity 82.6%; specificity 75.4%). The AUROC for CCOS-PROM and EQ-SI were 0.90 and 0.86, respectively.

Conclusion: CCOS-PROM is valid for assessing the outcome of CM1 surgery in adults. CCOS-PROM score of 13 and EQ-SI of 0.64 were the best tradeoff values.

使用患者报告的成人1型基亚里畸形的结果测量。
目的:验证芝加哥Chiari结果量表(CCOS)作为患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)工具,并确定CCOS- prom和EuroQoL-5D-3L评分指数(EQ-SI)对接受Chiari畸形1型(CM1)治疗的成人格式塔的截止值。材料和方法:本横断面研究分析了CM1成人术后12个月随访后的健康状况。一份电子表格被发送给CM患者组。自我完形良好知觉被分配为治疗或改善验证的目的。评估AUROC以验证每个PROM预测格式塔结果的能力。伦理审批注册:64148822.0.0000.5292。结果:85例患者平均年龄42.1(±10.6)岁,随访4.8(±4.1)年。格式塔结果良好的23例(27%)患者。74例患者中位CCOS-PROM为11(IQR 4)。84例患者中位EQ-SI为0.52(IQR为0.29)。CCOS-PROM评分为13分为最佳临界值(敏感性82.6%;特异性78.4%)。对于EQ-SI,该值为0.64(敏感性为82.6%;特异性75.4%)。CCOS-PROM和EQ-SI的AUROC分别为0.90和0.86。结论:CCOS-PROM是评估成人CM1手术预后的有效方法。CCOS-PROM评分为13,EQ-SI为0.64,为最佳权衡值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信