Simplifying Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (TELD) Through the Guiding Framework of Ten Landmarks.

Jia-Yuan Liu, Qing Huo, Meng Liu, Xuebin Tang, Haitang Liu, Liang Qiao
{"title":"Simplifying Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (TELD) Through the Guiding Framework of Ten Landmarks.","authors":"Jia-Yuan Liu, Qing Huo, Meng Liu, Xuebin Tang, Haitang Liu, Liang Qiao","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47234-24.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To streamline the transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) technique to facilitate a shorter learning curve for novice surgeons by providing a comprehensive guide featuring ten crucial landmarks.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation who underwent navigational TELD using ten landmarks from September 2021 to October 2022. We compared these patients with those who received conventional TELD from June 2020 to August 2021. A comprehensive account of the TELD surgical procedure, outlining each stage and introducing ten critical landmarks as surgical aids, is presented. Comparative analyses were conducted between the navigational and conventional groups, focusing on operation duration and fluoroscopic exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences observed between the navigational and conventional groups with regard to gender, age, and intraoperative VAS (visual analog scale) scores. The operation time and fluoroscopic exposures in the navigational group were notably reduced, measuring 56.33 ± 9.90 minutes and 4.97 ± 1.53, respectively, compared to 71.73 ± 17.80 minutes and 6.44 ± 1.52 in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited no significant disparity in VAS and ODI (Oswestry disability index) scores. Nevertheless, postoperatively, at both 1 day and 3 months, both groups demonstrated lower VAS and ODI scores in comparison to preoperative values. Notably, the scores at 3 months post-surgery were significantly lower than those recorded at 1 day post-surgery (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of guiding landmarks significantly streamlines and simplifies the TELD procedure. It substantially decreases operation duration, minimizes fluoroscopy usage, enhances surgical safety, and ensures consistent clinical effectiveness. These landmarks enable novice surgeons to master TELD more easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"412-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47234-24.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To streamline the transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) technique to facilitate a shorter learning curve for novice surgeons by providing a comprehensive guide featuring ten crucial landmarks.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation who underwent navigational TELD using ten landmarks from September 2021 to October 2022. We compared these patients with those who received conventional TELD from June 2020 to August 2021. A comprehensive account of the TELD surgical procedure, outlining each stage and introducing ten critical landmarks as surgical aids, is presented. Comparative analyses were conducted between the navigational and conventional groups, focusing on operation duration and fluoroscopic exposure.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences observed between the navigational and conventional groups with regard to gender, age, and intraoperative VAS (visual analog scale) scores. The operation time and fluoroscopic exposures in the navigational group were notably reduced, measuring 56.33 ± 9.90 minutes and 4.97 ± 1.53, respectively, compared to 71.73 ± 17.80 minutes and 6.44 ± 1.52 in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited no significant disparity in VAS and ODI (Oswestry disability index) scores. Nevertheless, postoperatively, at both 1 day and 3 months, both groups demonstrated lower VAS and ODI scores in comparison to preoperative values. Notably, the scores at 3 months post-surgery were significantly lower than those recorded at 1 day post-surgery (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The implementation of guiding landmarks significantly streamlines and simplifies the TELD procedure. It substantially decreases operation duration, minimizes fluoroscopy usage, enhances surgical safety, and ensures consistent clinical effectiveness. These landmarks enable novice surgeons to master TELD more easily.

经椎间孔内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术(TELD)的十个标志指导框架简化。
目的:通过提供包含10个关键标志的综合指南,简化经椎间孔内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术(TELD)技术,以缩短新手外科医生的学习曲线。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾了诊断为腰椎间盘突出症的患者,他们在2021年9月至2022年10月期间使用10个地标进行了导航TELD。我们将这些患者与从2020年6月到2021年8月接受常规TELD的患者进行了比较。一个全面的帐户的TELD手术程序,概述了每个阶段,并介绍了十个关键的里程碑作为手术辅助,提出。对导航组和常规组进行比较分析,重点是手术时间和透视暴露。结果:导航组与常规组在性别、年龄、术中视觉模拟评分方面无统计学差异。导航组手术时间和透视时间分别为56.33±9.90 min和4.97±1.53 min,而常规组为71.73±17.80 min和6.44±1.52 min (p < 0.05)。两组在VAS和ODI (Oswestry残疾指数)评分上无显著差异。然而,术后1天和3个月时,两组患者的VAS和ODI评分均低于术前。值得注意的是,术后3个月评分明显低于术后1天评分(p < 0.05)。结论:引导标志的实施,显著简化了TELD程序。它大大缩短了手术时间,最大限度地减少了透视的使用,提高了手术安全性,并确保了一致的临床效果。这些标志使外科新手更容易掌握TELD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信