"Beyond Glucose Control: A Critical Appraisal of Virtual vs. In-Person Care for Gestational Diabetes".

Muhammad Khubaib Iftikhar
{"title":"\"Beyond Glucose Control: A Critical Appraisal of Virtual vs. In-Person Care for Gestational Diabetes\".","authors":"Muhammad Khubaib Iftikhar","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>the article by Dolatabadi et al. offers timely insights into the use of virtual care in managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but several critical limitations temper the strength and applicability of its conclusions. This Letter to the Editor outlines concerns regarding the study's retrospective design, its omission of patient-reported and adherence-related outcomes, and its limited generalizability. Drawing on recent literature, including evaluations aligned with the Quadruple Aim and meta-analyses of digital interventions, we argue for more robust and patient-centered methodologies in future research. Virtual care in GDM holds promise, but its real-world effectiveness must be assessed through rigorous, equitable, and multidimensional frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":93918,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2025.05.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the article by Dolatabadi et al. offers timely insights into the use of virtual care in managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but several critical limitations temper the strength and applicability of its conclusions. This Letter to the Editor outlines concerns regarding the study's retrospective design, its omission of patient-reported and adherence-related outcomes, and its limited generalizability. Drawing on recent literature, including evaluations aligned with the Quadruple Aim and meta-analyses of digital interventions, we argue for more robust and patient-centered methodologies in future research. Virtual care in GDM holds promise, but its real-world effectiveness must be assessed through rigorous, equitable, and multidimensional frameworks.

“超越血糖控制:对妊娠糖尿病的虚拟与面对面护理的关键评估”。
Dolatabadi等人的文章对虚拟护理在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)管理中的应用提供了及时的见解,但几个关键的局限性削弱了其结论的强度和适用性。这封致编辑的信概述了对该研究的回顾性设计、患者报告和依从性相关结果的遗漏以及有限的通用性的关注。根据最近的文献,包括与“四重目标”相一致的评估和数字干预的荟萃分析,我们主张在未来的研究中采用更稳健、以患者为中心的方法。GDM中的虚拟医疗有希望,但必须通过严格、公平和多维的框架来评估其在现实世界中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信