Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intractable Trigeminal Neuralgia - Comparative Study Between Single Versus Two Isocenter Targets.

Kashif Ahmed, Aurangzeb Kalhoro, Zaheen Shibli, Abdul Hashim
{"title":"Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intractable Trigeminal Neuralgia - Comparative Study Between Single Versus Two Isocenter Targets.","authors":"Kashif Ahmed, Aurangzeb Kalhoro, Zaheen Shibli, Abdul Hashim","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"484-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44110-23.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of using Two isocenter targets in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) versus a single isocenter target solely at the root entry zone (REZ).

Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted.The study involved 171 patients with severe facial pain caused by TN. Pain intensity was measured using a pre/post-BNI scale. Group A (85 patients) received 90 Gy using a single isocenter at REZ with a 4mm collimator, while Group B (86 patients) received 90 Gy at two isocenters of the REZ and distal cisternal segment. Statistical analyses were done to assess differences between post-BNI scores and pain-free durations in the groups.

Results: Both groups had a mean patient age of 50 years. Group A had a longer presurgical pain duration (98 months) than Group B (78 months). In Group A, 33% reported pain relief to BNI class II and 67% to class III, while in Group B, 70% reported pain relief to BNI class I and 30% to BNI class II. Group A had a 40% 8-week pain relief rate, while Group B had a higher percentage of painfree durations of 6-7 weeks (21%) and 9 weeks (39%). Group B had a higher incidence of post-op facial numbness (27% vs. 14% in Group A). Significant differences existed between post-BNI pain intensities and pain-free durations in both groups.

Conclusion: Patients who received 90 Gy radiation at two isocenters had better outcomes than those with a single isocenter for GKRS. While Group B experienced earlier pain relief, Group A had fewer side effects. Two-isocenter GKRS is a safe and effective alternative for TN patients with a better pain management profile but an increased risk of facial hypoesthesia.

伽玛刀放射治疗顽固性三叉神经痛-单一与两个等中心靶点的比较研究。
目的:评估伽玛刀放射治疗(GKRS)中使用两个等中心靶点与仅在根入口区(REZ)使用单个等中心靶点治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:回顾性研究。该研究涉及171例由TN引起的严重面部疼痛患者。使用bni前/后量表测量疼痛强度。A组(85名患者)在REZ处使用一个4mm准直器接受90 Gy,而B组(86名患者)在REZ和远端池段的两个等中心接受90 Gy。统计分析后bni评分和各组无痛持续时间之间的差异。结果:两组患者平均年龄均为50岁。A组手术前疼痛持续时间(98个月)比B组(78个月)长。在A组中,33%的患者报告BNI II级疼痛缓解,67%的患者报告BNI III级疼痛缓解,而在B组中,70%的患者报告BNI I级疼痛缓解,30%的患者报告BNI II级疼痛缓解。A组8周疼痛缓解率为40%,而B组6-7周(21%)和9周(39%)的无痛持续时间百分比更高。B组术后面部麻木发生率较高(27% vs. a组14%)。两组术后疼痛强度和无痛持续时间存在显著差异。结论:两个等中心90gy的GKRS治疗效果优于单一等中心治疗。B组的疼痛缓解时间较早,而A组的副作用较少。双等中心GKRS是TN患者的一种安全有效的替代方案,具有更好的疼痛管理概况,但增加了面部感觉减退的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信