A Two-Step Therapeutic Strategy in the Management of Critical Neonatal Hydrocephalus.

Qian Ouyang, Junqiang Wang, Yijian Yang, Kaiyue Wang, Yexin Yuan, Maolin He, Zhijun Zhong, Gelei Xiao
{"title":"A Two-Step Therapeutic Strategy in the Management of Critical Neonatal Hydrocephalus.","authors":"Qian Ouyang, Junqiang Wang, Yijian Yang, Kaiyue Wang, Yexin Yuan, Maolin He, Zhijun Zhong, Gelei Xiao","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47201-24.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify novel therapeutic strategies to improve the outcomes of neonatal hydrocephalus.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The treatment strategies for cases of neonatal hydrocephalus in our hospital between February 1, 2015, and February 1, 2024 reviewed and analyzed, with the aim of identifying valuable factors to assist in treating future patients with critical neonatal hydrocephalus. We further conducted literature searches and summarized the relevant treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 neonates were included. The causes of hydrocephalus by case number were as follows: 59.1% due to cerebral hemorrhage, 24.0% due to intracranial infection, and 16.9% due to other causes. Additionally, 32.8% of patients had ultra-low birth weight (ULBW), 14.1% had very low birth weight (VLBW), and 53.1% had low birth weight (LBW). Preterm babies comprised 84.3% of all patients, whereas term babies comprised only 15.7%. Additionally, all treatments for patients involved surgery, with 3.06% undergoing endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), 29.59% undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), 32.65% undergoing extra-ventricular drainage (EVD), 1.53% undergoing ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS), and 20.41% undergoing Ommaya reservoir. Based on the collected information, we propose a novel two-step surgical treatment process for intensive neonatal hydrocephalus. In the first step, the patient?s physical status (weight and corrected gestational age) is improved and intracranial infection or bleeding are controlled. In the second step, a permanent shunt is placed once the patient meets the surgical criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our experience, we proposed a two-step treatment strategy for the surgical management of critical neonatal hydrocephalus. Moreover, we clarified the detailed criteria for each step of the treatment plan to promote a higher success rate in saving children?s lives. The prognosis of critical neonatal hydrocephalus can be favorable if appropriately treated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"439-448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47201-24.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To identify novel therapeutic strategies to improve the outcomes of neonatal hydrocephalus.

Material and methods: The treatment strategies for cases of neonatal hydrocephalus in our hospital between February 1, 2015, and February 1, 2024 reviewed and analyzed, with the aim of identifying valuable factors to assist in treating future patients with critical neonatal hydrocephalus. We further conducted literature searches and summarized the relevant treatment strategies.

Results: A total of 64 neonates were included. The causes of hydrocephalus by case number were as follows: 59.1% due to cerebral hemorrhage, 24.0% due to intracranial infection, and 16.9% due to other causes. Additionally, 32.8% of patients had ultra-low birth weight (ULBW), 14.1% had very low birth weight (VLBW), and 53.1% had low birth weight (LBW). Preterm babies comprised 84.3% of all patients, whereas term babies comprised only 15.7%. Additionally, all treatments for patients involved surgery, with 3.06% undergoing endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), 29.59% undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), 32.65% undergoing extra-ventricular drainage (EVD), 1.53% undergoing ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS), and 20.41% undergoing Ommaya reservoir. Based on the collected information, we propose a novel two-step surgical treatment process for intensive neonatal hydrocephalus. In the first step, the patient?s physical status (weight and corrected gestational age) is improved and intracranial infection or bleeding are controlled. In the second step, a permanent shunt is placed once the patient meets the surgical criteria.

Conclusion: Based on our experience, we proposed a two-step treatment strategy for the surgical management of critical neonatal hydrocephalus. Moreover, we clarified the detailed criteria for each step of the treatment plan to promote a higher success rate in saving children?s lives. The prognosis of critical neonatal hydrocephalus can be favorable if appropriately treated.

危重新生儿脑积水的两步治疗策略。
目的:探讨改善新生儿脑积水预后的新治疗策略。材料与方法:回顾分析我院2015年2月1日至2024年2月1日新生儿脑积水病例的治疗策略,旨在发现有价值的因素,以协助治疗未来危重新生儿脑积水患者。我们进一步进行文献检索并总结相关治疗策略。结果:共纳入64例新生儿。脑积水病因按病例数分列:脑出血占59.1%,颅内感染占24.0%,其他原因占16.9%。此外,32.8%的患者为超低出生体重(ULBW), 14.1%为极低出生体重(VLBW), 53.1%为低出生体重(LBW)。早产儿占所有患者的84.3%,而足月婴儿仅占15.7%。此外,所有患者的治疗均涉及手术,3.06%的患者接受了内镜下第三脑室造口术(ETV), 29.59%的患者接受了脑室腹腔分流术(VPS), 32.65%的患者接受了脑室外引流术(EVD), 1.53%的患者接受了脑室心房分流术(VAS), 20.41%的患者接受了Ommaya储液器。根据收集到的信息,我们提出了一种新的两步手术治疗重症新生儿脑积水的方法。在第一步,病人?患者的身体状况(体重和校正胎龄)得到改善,颅内感染或出血得到控制。第二步,一旦患者符合手术标准,就放置永久性分流器。结论:根据我们的经验,我们提出了新生儿危重脑积水手术治疗的两步治疗策略。此外,我们明确了治疗方案每一步的详细标准,以提高拯救儿童的成功率。年代的生活。危重新生儿脑积水如果治疗得当,预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信