Evaluation of Perforator Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Oncoplastic Immediate Reconstruction Following Breast Conservative Surgery in Lower and Lateral Breast Quadrant Lesions Perforator Fasciocutaneous Flaps for OBCS.

IF 1.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Mahmoud Ali Mohamed Abd El Mohsen, Ismail Ahmed Shafik, Shadin Hamza Hassan Abas, Mostafa Mahmoud Abdelfatah
{"title":"Evaluation of Perforator Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Oncoplastic Immediate Reconstruction Following Breast Conservative Surgery in Lower and Lateral Breast Quadrant Lesions Perforator Fasciocutaneous Flaps for OBCS.","authors":"Mahmoud Ali Mohamed Abd El Mohsen, Ismail Ahmed Shafik, Shadin Hamza Hassan Abas, Mostafa Mahmoud Abdelfatah","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the oncological safety and the cosmetic outcome of the techniques anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP), lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap as a volume replacement technique to eliminate deformity and preserve breast cosmesis by filling the excised defect.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included women with lower outer quadrant, lower inner quadrant, and upper outer quadrant tumors who underwent upfront or post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast conserving surgery with immediate volume replacement surgery. Patients were allocated into three groups at a ratio of 1:1: Group A (<i>n</i> = 10): women who underwent LICAP flap, group B (<i>n</i> = 10): Women who underwent AICAP, and group C (<i>n</i> = 10): Women who underwent TDAP flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding postoperative complications, wound infection took place in only one (10%) patient in LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the AICAP group; seroma occurred in only one (10%) patient in LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the TDAP group; and fat necrosis occurred in only one (10%) patient in the TDAP group. Incidence of wound infection, seroma, and fat necrosis was insignificantly different among the studied groups. Breast distortion occurred in one (10%) patient in the AICAP group and not observed in the other groups, and partial flap necrosis occurred in one (10%) patient in the LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the AICAP group and was not observed in the TDAP group. Incidence of distortion and partial flap necrosis were insignificantly different between the studied groups. The conservative treatment of breast cancer core results, surgeon's assessment, patient's satisfaction and breast Q scores did not differ between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A better cosmetic outcome than level II oncoplastic techniques, the perforator fasciocutaneous flaps, LICAP, AICAP, and TDAP, were effective and safe options for immediate breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery. All three techniques showed similar surgical outcomes, low complication rates, and good aesthetic results. Patient satisfaction was high, with no significant differences between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":" ","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the oncological safety and the cosmetic outcome of the techniques anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP), lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap as a volume replacement technique to eliminate deformity and preserve breast cosmesis by filling the excised defect.

Materials and methods: This prospective study included women with lower outer quadrant, lower inner quadrant, and upper outer quadrant tumors who underwent upfront or post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast conserving surgery with immediate volume replacement surgery. Patients were allocated into three groups at a ratio of 1:1: Group A (n = 10): women who underwent LICAP flap, group B (n = 10): Women who underwent AICAP, and group C (n = 10): Women who underwent TDAP flap procedures.

Results: Regarding postoperative complications, wound infection took place in only one (10%) patient in LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the AICAP group; seroma occurred in only one (10%) patient in LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the TDAP group; and fat necrosis occurred in only one (10%) patient in the TDAP group. Incidence of wound infection, seroma, and fat necrosis was insignificantly different among the studied groups. Breast distortion occurred in one (10%) patient in the AICAP group and not observed in the other groups, and partial flap necrosis occurred in one (10%) patient in the LICAP group and one (10%) patient in the AICAP group and was not observed in the TDAP group. Incidence of distortion and partial flap necrosis were insignificantly different between the studied groups. The conservative treatment of breast cancer core results, surgeon's assessment, patient's satisfaction and breast Q scores did not differ between the three groups.

Conclusion: A better cosmetic outcome than level II oncoplastic techniques, the perforator fasciocutaneous flaps, LICAP, AICAP, and TDAP, were effective and safe options for immediate breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery. All three techniques showed similar surgical outcomes, low complication rates, and good aesthetic results. Patient satisfaction was high, with no significant differences between the groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

穿支筋膜皮瓣在乳腺下外侧象限病变保守手术后立即重建肿瘤中的应用价值
目的:比较前肋间动脉穿支(AICAP)、外侧肋间动脉穿支(LICAP)和胸背动脉穿支(TDAP)皮瓣作为体积置换技术,通过填充切除的缺损来消除畸形和保留乳房美观性的肿瘤安全性和美容效果。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究纳入了下外象限、下内象限和上外象限肿瘤患者,她们接受了保乳手术前或后新辅助化疗并立即进行体积置换手术。患者按1:1的比例分为三组:a组(n = 10):行LICAP皮瓣的妇女,B组(n = 10):行AICAP的妇女,C组(n = 10):行TDAP皮瓣手术的妇女。结果:在术后并发症方面,LICAP组仅1例(10%)发生伤口感染,AICAP组1例(10%)发生伤口感染;LICAP组仅1例(10%)发生血清瘤,TDAP组1例(10%)发生血清瘤;TDAP组仅有1例(10%)患者出现脂肪坏死。各组间伤口感染、血清肿、脂肪坏死发生率差异无统计学意义。AICAP组有1例(10%)患者出现乳房变形,其他组均未观察到;LICAP组和AICAP组各有1例(10%)患者出现部分皮瓣坏死,TDAP组均未观察到。两组间皮瓣变形及部分坏死的发生率差异无统计学意义。三组保守治疗乳腺癌核心结果、外科医生评价、患者满意度及乳腺Q评分均无差异。结论:与二级肿瘤整形技术相比,穿支筋膜皮瓣、LICAP、AICAP和TDAP是保乳手术后立即乳房重建的有效和安全的选择,美容效果更好。这三种技术的手术效果相似,并发症发生率低,美观效果好。患者满意度高,两组间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信