Ethical and social considerations of applying artificial intelligence in healthcare-a two-pronged scoping review.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Emanuele Ratti, Michael Morrison, Ivett Jakab
{"title":"Ethical and social considerations of applying artificial intelligence in healthcare-a two-pronged scoping review.","authors":"Emanuele Ratti, Michael Morrison, Ivett Jakab","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01198-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being designed, tested, and in many cases actively employed in almost every aspect of healthcare from primary care to public health. It is by now well established that any application of AI carries an attendant responsibility to consider the ethical and societal aspects of its development, deployment and impact. However, in the rapidly developing field of AI, developments such as machine learning, neural networks, generative AI, and large language models have the potential to raise new and distinct ethical and social issues compared to, for example, automated data processing or more 'basic' algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article presents a scoping review of the ethical and social issues pertaining to AI in healthcare, with a novel two-pronged design. One strand of the review (SR1) consists of a broad review of the academic literature restricted to a recent timeframe (2021-23), to better capture up to date developments and debates. The second strand (SR2) consists of a narrow review, limited to prior systematic and scoping reviews on the ethics of AI in healthcare, but extended over a longer timeframe (2014-2024) to capture longstanding and recurring themes and issues in the debate. This strategy provides a practical way to deal with an increasingly voluminous literature on the ethics of AI in healthcare in a way that accounts for both the depth and evolution of the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SR1 captures the heterogeneity of audience, medical fields, and ethical and societal themes (and their tradeoffs) raised by AI systems. SR2 provides a comprehensive picture of the way scoping reviews on ethical and societal issues in AI in healthcare have been conceptualized, as well as the trends and gaps identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis shows that the typical approach to ethical issues in AI, which is based on the appeal to general principles, becomes increasingly unlikely to do justice to the nuances and specificities of the ethical and societal issues raised by AI in healthcare, as the technology moves from abstract debate and discussion to real world situated applications and concerns in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01198-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being designed, tested, and in many cases actively employed in almost every aspect of healthcare from primary care to public health. It is by now well established that any application of AI carries an attendant responsibility to consider the ethical and societal aspects of its development, deployment and impact. However, in the rapidly developing field of AI, developments such as machine learning, neural networks, generative AI, and large language models have the potential to raise new and distinct ethical and social issues compared to, for example, automated data processing or more 'basic' algorithms.

Methods: This article presents a scoping review of the ethical and social issues pertaining to AI in healthcare, with a novel two-pronged design. One strand of the review (SR1) consists of a broad review of the academic literature restricted to a recent timeframe (2021-23), to better capture up to date developments and debates. The second strand (SR2) consists of a narrow review, limited to prior systematic and scoping reviews on the ethics of AI in healthcare, but extended over a longer timeframe (2014-2024) to capture longstanding and recurring themes and issues in the debate. This strategy provides a practical way to deal with an increasingly voluminous literature on the ethics of AI in healthcare in a way that accounts for both the depth and evolution of the literature.

Results: SR1 captures the heterogeneity of audience, medical fields, and ethical and societal themes (and their tradeoffs) raised by AI systems. SR2 provides a comprehensive picture of the way scoping reviews on ethical and societal issues in AI in healthcare have been conceptualized, as well as the trends and gaps identified.

Conclusion: Our analysis shows that the typical approach to ethical issues in AI, which is based on the appeal to general principles, becomes increasingly unlikely to do justice to the nuances and specificities of the ethical and societal issues raised by AI in healthcare, as the technology moves from abstract debate and discussion to real world situated applications and concerns in healthcare settings.

在医疗保健中应用人工智能的伦理和社会考虑——两方面的范围审查。
背景:人工智能(AI)正在被设计、测试,并在许多情况下积极应用于从初级保健到公共卫生的医疗保健的几乎每个方面。到目前为止,人工智能的任何应用都有责任考虑其开发、部署和影响的道德和社会方面。然而,在快速发展的人工智能领域,与自动化数据处理或更“基本”的算法相比,机器学习、神经网络、生成式人工智能和大型语言模型等发展有可能引发新的、独特的伦理和社会问题。方法:这篇文章提出了一个范围审查有关人工智能在医疗保健,具有新颖的双管齐下的设计伦理和社会问题。审查的一部分(SR1)包括对限于最近时间框架(2021-23)的学术文献的广泛审查,以更好地捕捉最新的发展和辩论。第二部分(SR2)包括一个狭窄的审查,仅限于先前对医疗保健中人工智能伦理的系统和范围审查,但扩展到更长的时间框架(2014-2024年),以捕捉辩论中长期存在和反复出现的主题和问题。这一策略提供了一种实用的方法来处理越来越多的关于医疗保健中人工智能伦理的文献,这种方法既能解释文献的深度,也能解释文献的演变。结果:SR1捕获了人工智能系统提出的受众、医学领域以及伦理和社会主题(及其权衡)的异质性。SR2提供了对医疗保健中人工智能伦理和社会问题的范围审查方式的全面概述,以及确定的趋势和差距。结论:我们的分析表明,人工智能伦理问题的典型方法是基于对一般原则的呼吁,随着技术从抽象的辩论和讨论转向现实世界中的应用和关注,人工智能在医疗保健领域引发的伦理和社会问题的细微差别和特殊性越来越不可能得到公正的对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信