Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of customized lingual orthodontic brackets fabricated by metal 3-dimensional printing and casting: An in vitro study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Viet Anh Nguyen, Khanh Linh Trinh, Thi Lan Anh Le, Huy Cong Nguyen, Thu Tra Nguyen
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of customized lingual orthodontic brackets fabricated by metal 3-dimensional printing and casting: An in vitro study.","authors":"Viet Anh Nguyen, Khanh Linh Trinh, Thi Lan Anh Le, Huy Cong Nguyen, Thu Tra Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Customized lingual orthodontic brackets require high accuracy for optimal clinical performance. Metal 3-dimensional (3D) printing and casting techniques using 3D-printed wax patterns have emerged as fabrication methods. However, comparative evaluations of their dimensional accuracy and frictional behavior remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy and frictional characteristics of customized lingual brackets fabricated using selective laser melting and conventional casting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six customized lingual brackets (n = 18 per group) were fabricated. The trueness and actual gaps of the bracket base were assessed using triple-scan superimposition. Positional accuracy was evaluated by linear and angular deviations, and dimensional accuracy was assessed through slot height error and convergence angle. Frictional force was measured by pulling an archwire through the bracket slot. After polishing and thermocycling, dimensional and frictional evaluations were repeated. Data were analyzed using independent samples t tests (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-dimensional-printed brackets showed significantly higher trueness errors (34.5 μm) and slot height errors (29.69 μm) than cast brackets (25.2 and 21.28 μm). Frictional force was also significantly higher in the as-fabricated 3D-printed group (3.61 and 2.46 N; P <0.001). Postpolishing significantly reduced friction but did not eliminate the differences, whereas dimensional differences were no longer statistically significant between groups. Positional accuracy and convergence angle showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-dimensional printing and casting techniques both achieved clinically acceptable positional accuracy. However, dimensional discrepancies and higher friction in 3D-printed brackets highlight the need for optimized postprocessing to enhance clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.05.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Customized lingual orthodontic brackets require high accuracy for optimal clinical performance. Metal 3-dimensional (3D) printing and casting techniques using 3D-printed wax patterns have emerged as fabrication methods. However, comparative evaluations of their dimensional accuracy and frictional behavior remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy and frictional characteristics of customized lingual brackets fabricated using selective laser melting and conventional casting.

Methods: Thirty-six customized lingual brackets (n = 18 per group) were fabricated. The trueness and actual gaps of the bracket base were assessed using triple-scan superimposition. Positional accuracy was evaluated by linear and angular deviations, and dimensional accuracy was assessed through slot height error and convergence angle. Frictional force was measured by pulling an archwire through the bracket slot. After polishing and thermocycling, dimensional and frictional evaluations were repeated. Data were analyzed using independent samples t tests (P <0.05).

Results: Three-dimensional-printed brackets showed significantly higher trueness errors (34.5 μm) and slot height errors (29.69 μm) than cast brackets (25.2 and 21.28 μm). Frictional force was also significantly higher in the as-fabricated 3D-printed group (3.61 and 2.46 N; P <0.001). Postpolishing significantly reduced friction but did not eliminate the differences, whereas dimensional differences were no longer statistically significant between groups. Positional accuracy and convergence angle showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions: Three-dimensional printing and casting techniques both achieved clinically acceptable positional accuracy. However, dimensional discrepancies and higher friction in 3D-printed brackets highlight the need for optimized postprocessing to enhance clinical performance.

金属三维打印与铸造定制舌正畸托槽精度的体外比较研究。
介绍:定制的舌正畸托槽要求高精度,以达到最佳的临床效果。使用3D打印蜡图案的金属三维(3D)打印和铸造技术已经成为制造方法。然而,对它们的尺寸精度和摩擦性能的比较评估仍然有限。本研究旨在评估和比较使用选择性激光熔化和传统铸造制造的定制舌托的精度和摩擦特性。方法:制作定制牙托36个,每组18个。采用三扫描叠加法评估支架底座的真实度和实际间隙。通过线差和角差评价定位精度,通过槽高误差和收敛角评价尺寸精度。通过拉一根拱线穿过支架槽来测量摩擦力。抛光和热循环后,重复尺寸和摩擦评估。结果:三维打印支架的正确度误差(34.5 μm)和槽位高度误差(29.69 μm)显著高于铸造支架(25.2 μm和21.28 μm)。3d打印组的摩擦力也明显更高(3.61和2.46 N;结论:三维打印和铸造技术均达到临床可接受的定位精度。然而,3d打印支架的尺寸差异和更高的摩擦突出了优化后处理以提高临床表现的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信