Proposed barriers and facilitators for engaging with neuropsychological services by Black and South Asian populations in the UK: A qualitative systematic review of ethnic minority access of neurological services.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sheeba Ehsan, Nadine Mirza, Anvita Vikram, Fatima Osmani, Natasha Kumar, Sabah Orakzai, Surina Sharma
{"title":"Proposed barriers and facilitators for engaging with neuropsychological services by Black and South Asian populations in the UK: A qualitative systematic review of ethnic minority access of neurological services.","authors":"Sheeba Ehsan, Nadine Mirza, Anvita Vikram, Fatima Osmani, Natasha Kumar, Sabah Orakzai, Surina Sharma","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2508481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> British ethnic minorities are underrepresented in neuropsychological services for conditions such as stroke and epilepsy, despite being disproportionately at risk. However, there is little data on why and how to improve this. Given the absence of studies examining the provision of neuropsychological services we aimed to systematically review qualitative studies and synthesise data on British ethnic minorities access of neurological services and propose barriers and facilitators they may face when engaging with neuropsychological services. <b>Method:</b> Our search strategy for six databases located qualitative studies investigating British ethnic minorities' views and experiences of neurological services. Studies were eligible if they included ethnic minority patients with a neurological condition or their caregiver, or staff in a neurological service. Studies described at least one barrier or facilitator to accessing and engaging with neurological services. This data was extracted and thematically synthesised. <b>Results:</b> 2,001 studies were identified and 16 included after screening, which focused primarily on Black and South Asian populations. We synthesised data into five overarching themes: \"information gap\", 'beliefs and experiences', 'diagnostic assessment', 'treatment measures', and 'communication issues'. Barriers within these include misunderstanding around neurological conditions and their management, language issues, being dismissed or neglected, and assumptions made about ethnicity. Facilitators include timely and accurate provision of information and a person-centered approach to care by accommodating for cultural needs while also understanding patients as individuals beyond their ethnicity. <b>Conclusions:</b> Themes highlighted gaps across the overall service pathway and at individual stages, from initial access to diagnosis to treatment. They also have the potential to influence each other. Themes indicate what current clinical service provision should address and what future research should focus on.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2508481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: British ethnic minorities are underrepresented in neuropsychological services for conditions such as stroke and epilepsy, despite being disproportionately at risk. However, there is little data on why and how to improve this. Given the absence of studies examining the provision of neuropsychological services we aimed to systematically review qualitative studies and synthesise data on British ethnic minorities access of neurological services and propose barriers and facilitators they may face when engaging with neuropsychological services. Method: Our search strategy for six databases located qualitative studies investigating British ethnic minorities' views and experiences of neurological services. Studies were eligible if they included ethnic minority patients with a neurological condition or their caregiver, or staff in a neurological service. Studies described at least one barrier or facilitator to accessing and engaging with neurological services. This data was extracted and thematically synthesised. Results: 2,001 studies were identified and 16 included after screening, which focused primarily on Black and South Asian populations. We synthesised data into five overarching themes: "information gap", 'beliefs and experiences', 'diagnostic assessment', 'treatment measures', and 'communication issues'. Barriers within these include misunderstanding around neurological conditions and their management, language issues, being dismissed or neglected, and assumptions made about ethnicity. Facilitators include timely and accurate provision of information and a person-centered approach to care by accommodating for cultural needs while also understanding patients as individuals beyond their ethnicity. Conclusions: Themes highlighted gaps across the overall service pathway and at individual stages, from initial access to diagnosis to treatment. They also have the potential to influence each other. Themes indicate what current clinical service provision should address and what future research should focus on.

英国黑人和南亚人口参与神经心理服务的障碍和促进因素:对少数民族获得神经服务的定性系统回顾。
目的:英国少数民族在中风和癫痫等疾病的神经心理服务中代表性不足,尽管他们的风险不成比例。然而,关于为什么以及如何改善这一点的数据很少。鉴于缺乏对神经心理服务提供的研究,我们旨在系统地审查英国少数民族获得神经服务的定性研究和综合数据,并提出他们在接受神经心理服务时可能面临的障碍和促进因素。方法:我们的搜索策略为六个数据库定位定性研究调查英国少数民族对神经服务的看法和经验。如果研究对象包括患有神经系统疾病的少数民族患者或他们的护理人员,或神经系统服务的工作人员,则研究符合条件。研究描述了获得和参与神经系统服务的至少一个障碍或促进因素。这些数据被提取出来并按主题进行合成。结果:2001项研究被确定,筛选后纳入16项研究,主要集中在黑人和南亚人群。我们将数据综合为五个总体主题:“信息差距”、“信念和经验”、“诊断评估”、“治疗措施”和“沟通问题”。其中的障碍包括对神经系统疾病及其管理的误解,语言问题,被忽视或忽视,以及对种族的假设。促进因素包括及时准确地提供信息和以人为本的护理方法,通过适应文化需求,同时也将患者视为超越其种族的个体。结论:主题突出了从最初获得诊断到治疗的整个服务途径和各个阶段的差距。它们也有可能相互影响。主题表明当前的临床服务提供应该解决的问题以及未来的研究应该关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信