Shaline Escarfulleri, Alicia J Spiegel, Hinza B Malik, Lauren M D Faulkner, Brian D Gradwohl, Kathryn A Tolle, Carrington R Wendell, Danielle Shaked, Shari R Waldstein, Leslie I Katzel, Stephen L Seliger, Robert J Spencer
{"title":"Symbol Digit Modalities Test incidental learning: Concurrent validity and clinical utility.","authors":"Shaline Escarfulleri, Alicia J Spiegel, Hinza B Malik, Lauren M D Faulkner, Brian D Gradwohl, Kathryn A Tolle, Carrington R Wendell, Danielle Shaked, Shari R Waldstein, Leslie I Katzel, Stephen L Seliger, Robert J Spencer","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project examined the Incidental Learning (IL) procedure from the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) as both a screening tool and as a measure of memory. Participants included undergraduate college students and stroke- and dementia-free older adult volunteers with and without hypertension or chronic kidney disease. In each sample, IL scores were correlated with performances from a variety of cognitive tasks. Results indicated that IL scores were more strongly associated with tests of memory than other cognitive abilities. As a screening instrument for older adults, scores of four or more recalled symbol-digit pairings strongly indicated a lack of difficulties on other tests of memory, whereas scores of three or fewer suggested a need for further assessment, though not necessarily impairment. A novel recognition (IL-r) procedure was introduced to older participants without kidney disease, and results indicated that IL-r uniquely predicted both delayed verbal and visual memory beyond standard IL. Our findings suggest that IL can be regarded as an efficient supplemental or screening test of memory that offers a complementary methodology to a comprehensive assessment of memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This project examined the Incidental Learning (IL) procedure from the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) as both a screening tool and as a measure of memory. Participants included undergraduate college students and stroke- and dementia-free older adult volunteers with and without hypertension or chronic kidney disease. In each sample, IL scores were correlated with performances from a variety of cognitive tasks. Results indicated that IL scores were more strongly associated with tests of memory than other cognitive abilities. As a screening instrument for older adults, scores of four or more recalled symbol-digit pairings strongly indicated a lack of difficulties on other tests of memory, whereas scores of three or fewer suggested a need for further assessment, though not necessarily impairment. A novel recognition (IL-r) procedure was introduced to older participants without kidney disease, and results indicated that IL-r uniquely predicted both delayed verbal and visual memory beyond standard IL. Our findings suggest that IL can be regarded as an efficient supplemental or screening test of memory that offers a complementary methodology to a comprehensive assessment of memory.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.