Symbol Digit Modalities Test incidental learning: Concurrent validity and clinical utility.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shaline Escarfulleri, Alicia J Spiegel, Hinza B Malik, Lauren M D Faulkner, Brian D Gradwohl, Kathryn A Tolle, Carrington R Wendell, Danielle Shaked, Shari R Waldstein, Leslie I Katzel, Stephen L Seliger, Robert J Spencer
{"title":"Symbol Digit Modalities Test incidental learning: Concurrent validity and clinical utility.","authors":"Shaline Escarfulleri, Alicia J Spiegel, Hinza B Malik, Lauren M D Faulkner, Brian D Gradwohl, Kathryn A Tolle, Carrington R Wendell, Danielle Shaked, Shari R Waldstein, Leslie I Katzel, Stephen L Seliger, Robert J Spencer","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project examined the Incidental Learning (IL) procedure from the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) as both a screening tool and as a measure of memory. Participants included undergraduate college students and stroke- and dementia-free older adult volunteers with and without hypertension or chronic kidney disease. In each sample, IL scores were correlated with performances from a variety of cognitive tasks. Results indicated that IL scores were more strongly associated with tests of memory than other cognitive abilities. As a screening instrument for older adults, scores of four or more recalled symbol-digit pairings strongly indicated a lack of difficulties on other tests of memory, whereas scores of three or fewer suggested a need for further assessment, though not necessarily impairment. A novel recognition (IL-r) procedure was introduced to older participants without kidney disease, and results indicated that IL-r uniquely predicted both delayed verbal and visual memory beyond standard IL. Our findings suggest that IL can be regarded as an efficient supplemental or screening test of memory that offers a complementary methodology to a comprehensive assessment of memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project examined the Incidental Learning (IL) procedure from the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) as both a screening tool and as a measure of memory. Participants included undergraduate college students and stroke- and dementia-free older adult volunteers with and without hypertension or chronic kidney disease. In each sample, IL scores were correlated with performances from a variety of cognitive tasks. Results indicated that IL scores were more strongly associated with tests of memory than other cognitive abilities. As a screening instrument for older adults, scores of four or more recalled symbol-digit pairings strongly indicated a lack of difficulties on other tests of memory, whereas scores of three or fewer suggested a need for further assessment, though not necessarily impairment. A novel recognition (IL-r) procedure was introduced to older participants without kidney disease, and results indicated that IL-r uniquely predicted both delayed verbal and visual memory beyond standard IL. Our findings suggest that IL can be regarded as an efficient supplemental or screening test of memory that offers a complementary methodology to a comprehensive assessment of memory.

符号数字模态测验附带学习:同时效度与临床效用。
本项目研究了符号-数字模态测试(SDMT)的附带学习(IL)过程,作为一种筛选工具和记忆测量方法。参与者包括本科生和无中风和痴呆的老年志愿者,有或没有高血压或慢性肾脏疾病。在每个样本中,IL得分与各种认知任务的表现相关。结果表明,与其他认知能力相比,IL分数与记忆测试的关联更强。作为老年人的筛选工具,四分或四分以上的记忆符号-数字配对强烈表明在其他记忆测试中没有困难,而三分或更少的分数表明需要进一步评估,尽管不一定是损害。一种新的识别(IL-r)程序被引入到没有肾脏疾病的老年参与者中,结果表明,IL-r比标准IL更能独特地预测延迟的言语和视觉记忆。我们的研究结果表明,IL可以被视为记忆的有效补充或筛选测试,为全面评估记忆提供了一种补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信