Benchmarking IMIA recommendations for the health informatics undergraduate program in Saudi Arabia: a mixed methodology.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Haitham Alzghaibi, Qazi Mohammad Sajid Jamal, Sulaiman Almutairi, Reem M Alotaibi, Saleh Alzughaibi, Shabbir Syed Abdul, Faisal AlGhayadh, Shafiz Affend Mohd Yusof, Nasriah Zakaria
{"title":"Benchmarking IMIA recommendations for the health informatics undergraduate program in Saudi Arabia: a mixed methodology.","authors":"Haitham Alzghaibi, Qazi Mohammad Sajid Jamal, Sulaiman Almutairi, Reem M Alotaibi, Saleh Alzughaibi, Shabbir Syed Abdul, Faisal AlGhayadh, Shafiz Affend Mohd Yusof, Nasriah Zakaria","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07260-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health informatics is a multidisciplinary field that supports the use and management of health data to enhance the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. As digital transformation accelerates in healthcare systems, particularly in Saudi Arabia, there is a growing need to ensure that undergraduate education programs in this field meet both national priorities and international standards.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the content of undergraduate health informatics programs in Saudi universities with international curriculum recommendations, and to explore professional stakeholder perceptions on essential educational components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used, combining a national cross-sectional survey of healthcare and academic professionals with document analysis of curricula from five universities offering undergraduate degrees in health informatics. The survey assessed perspectives on six educational domains, including technical, clinical, behavioural, managerial, and foundational knowledge areas. The document review evaluated program structures against globally recognized curriculum guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 experts completed the survey. Most respondents strongly supported the inclusion of a structured internship, with six months identified as the optimal duration. While all universities covered core technical and health content, there was substantial variation in how each emphasized different domains. For instance, one university focused heavily on data and computing, while others gave greater attention to health sciences or foundational principles. Differences were also observed between stakeholder expectations and international benchmarks, especially regarding applied skills, behavioural sciences, and leadership training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undergraduate health informatics programs in Saudi Arabia show encouraging progress but vary widely in structure and focus. The findings highlight the need for more standardized educational models that integrate practical skills and international best practices while responding to local healthcare needs. This study offers actionable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to improve health informatics education and workforce readiness in a global context.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07260-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health informatics is a multidisciplinary field that supports the use and management of health data to enhance the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. As digital transformation accelerates in healthcare systems, particularly in Saudi Arabia, there is a growing need to ensure that undergraduate education programs in this field meet both national priorities and international standards.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the content of undergraduate health informatics programs in Saudi universities with international curriculum recommendations, and to explore professional stakeholder perceptions on essential educational components.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was used, combining a national cross-sectional survey of healthcare and academic professionals with document analysis of curricula from five universities offering undergraduate degrees in health informatics. The survey assessed perspectives on six educational domains, including technical, clinical, behavioural, managerial, and foundational knowledge areas. The document review evaluated program structures against globally recognized curriculum guidelines.

Results: A total of 127 experts completed the survey. Most respondents strongly supported the inclusion of a structured internship, with six months identified as the optimal duration. While all universities covered core technical and health content, there was substantial variation in how each emphasized different domains. For instance, one university focused heavily on data and computing, while others gave greater attention to health sciences or foundational principles. Differences were also observed between stakeholder expectations and international benchmarks, especially regarding applied skills, behavioural sciences, and leadership training.

Conclusion: Undergraduate health informatics programs in Saudi Arabia show encouraging progress but vary widely in structure and focus. The findings highlight the need for more standardized educational models that integrate practical skills and international best practices while responding to local healthcare needs. This study offers actionable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to improve health informatics education and workforce readiness in a global context.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

基准IMIA建议健康信息学本科课程在沙特阿拉伯:一个混合的方法。
背景:卫生信息学是一个多学科领域,支持卫生数据的使用和管理,以提高卫生保健服务的质量和效率。随着医疗保健系统的数字化转型加速,特别是在沙特阿拉伯,越来越需要确保该领域的本科教育项目符合国家优先事项和国际标准。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较沙特大学本科健康信息学课程与国际课程建议的内容,并探讨专业利益相关者对基本教育内容的看法。方法:采用混合方法设计,对全国卫生保健和学术专业人员进行横断面调查,并对五所提供卫生信息学本科学位的大学的课程进行文献分析。调查评估了六个教育领域的观点,包括技术、临床、行为、管理和基础知识领域。文件审查根据全球公认的课程指南评估了课程结构。结果:共有127位专家完成调查。大多数受访者强烈支持将结构化实习纳入其中,并将六个月确定为最佳实习期。虽然所有大学都涵盖核心技术和卫生内容,但每个大学在强调不同领域的方式上存在很大差异。例如,一所大学主要侧重于数据和计算,而其他大学则更多地关注健康科学或基础原理。利益相关者的期望与国际基准之间也存在差异,特别是在应用技能、行为科学和领导力培训方面。结论:沙特阿拉伯的本科健康信息学课程取得了令人鼓舞的进展,但在结构和重点方面差异很大。研究结果强调需要更加标准化的教育模式,在满足当地医疗保健需求的同时,将实践技能和国际最佳做法结合起来。这项研究为决策者和教育工作者提供了可行的见解,旨在改善全球范围内的健康信息学教育和劳动力准备。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信