Optimal Electrode Configuration for Masseter Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential: A Comparison Between Zygomatic and Forehead Electrode Montages.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Aishwarya Nagarajan, Sujeet Kumar Sinha
{"title":"Optimal Electrode Configuration for Masseter Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential: A Comparison Between Zygomatic and Forehead Electrode Montages.","authors":"Aishwarya Nagarajan, Sujeet Kumar Sinha","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a short-latency electromyographic potential that assesses the integrity of the vestibule&#8211;masseteric reflex pathway. Due to limited normative studies, there is no optimal mVEMP protocol to be implemented clinically. Apart from the conventional electrode configuration, a na&#239;ve montage referred to as the forehead reference has been used in recent studies.<b>Purpose:</b> This study compared latency and amplitude parameters of mVEMP between the zygomatic and forehead electrode configurations to address the optimal electrode montage to elicit mVEMP.<b>Research Design:</b> Cross-sectional research study.<b>Study Sample:</b> Thirty healthy participants (mean age: 23.3&#8201;years; 14 males and 16 females).<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Participants underwent mVEMP testing under two-electrode montage conditions (zygomatic and forehead reference electrode montages).<b>Results:</b> Statistically significant increases in P1 latency, decrease in N1 latency, reduction of P1-N1 interpeak interval, enlargement of both unrectified and electromyography-rectified amplitudes, and lower interaural amplitude asymmetry ratio were observed for the forehead electrode montage compared to the conventional zygomatic montage.<b>Conclusions:</b> mVEMP response waveforms obtained using forehead reference electrode montage are superior to the zygomatic montage. Hence, the forehead montage is suggested for further research on mVEMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a short-latency electromyographic potential that assesses the integrity of the vestibule–masseteric reflex pathway. Due to limited normative studies, there is no optimal mVEMP protocol to be implemented clinically. Apart from the conventional electrode configuration, a naïve montage referred to as the forehead reference has been used in recent studies.Purpose: This study compared latency and amplitude parameters of mVEMP between the zygomatic and forehead electrode configurations to address the optimal electrode montage to elicit mVEMP.Research Design: Cross-sectional research study.Study Sample: Thirty healthy participants (mean age: 23.3 years; 14 males and 16 females).Data Collection and Analysis: Participants underwent mVEMP testing under two-electrode montage conditions (zygomatic and forehead reference electrode montages).Results: Statistically significant increases in P1 latency, decrease in N1 latency, reduction of P1-N1 interpeak interval, enlargement of both unrectified and electromyography-rectified amplitudes, and lower interaural amplitude asymmetry ratio were observed for the forehead electrode montage compared to the conventional zygomatic montage.Conclusions: mVEMP response waveforms obtained using forehead reference electrode montage are superior to the zygomatic montage. Hence, the forehead montage is suggested for further research on mVEMP.

咬肌前庭诱发肌电位的最佳电极配置:颧骨和前额电极蒙太奇的比较。
背景:咬肌前庭诱发肌源电位(mVEMP)是一种短潜伏期肌电图电位,用于评估前庭咬肌反射通路的完整性。由于规范研究有限,目前尚无最佳的mVEMP临床实施方案。除了传统的电极配置外,在最近的研究中还使用了一种称为前额参考的naï;ve蒙太奇。目的:比较颧骨电极和前额电极诱发mVEMP的潜伏期和振幅参数,探讨诱发mVEMP的最佳电极蒙太奇。研究设计:横断面研究。研究样本:30名健康参与者(平均年龄:23.3 ;岁;14男16女)。数据收集和分析:参与者在双电极蒙太奇条件下(颧骨和前额参考电极蒙太奇)进行mVEMP测试。结果:与常规颧骨蒙太奇相比,前额电极蒙太奇的P1潜伏期增加,N1潜伏期减少,P1-N1峰间间隔缩短,未整流和整流肌电波幅均增大,耳间波幅不对称比降低,具有统计学意义。结论:采用前额参考电极蒙太奇获得的mVEMP响应波形优于颧参考电极蒙太奇。因此,前额蒙太奇可以作为进一步研究mVEMP的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信