Optimal Electrode Configuration for Masseter Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential: A Comparison Between Zygomatic and Forehead Electrode Montages.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.3766/jaaa.240100
Aishwarya Nagarajan, Sujeet Kumar Sinha
{"title":"Optimal Electrode Configuration for Masseter Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential: A Comparison Between Zygomatic and Forehead Electrode Montages.","authors":"Aishwarya Nagarajan, Sujeet Kumar Sinha","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a short-latency electromyographic potential that assesses the integrity of the vestibule-masseteric reflex pathway. Due to limited normative studies, there is no optimal mVEMP protocol to be implemented clinically. Apart from the conventional electrode configuration, a naïve montage referred to as the forehead reference has been used in recent studies. <b>Purpose:</b> This study compared latency and amplitude parameters of mVEMP between the zygomatic and forehead electrode configurations to address the optimal electrode montage to elicit mVEMP. <b>Research Design:</b> Cross-sectional research study. <b>Study Sample:</b> Thirty healthy participants (mean age: 23.3 years; 14 males and 16 females). <b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Participants underwent mVEMP testing under two-electrode montage conditions (zygomatic and forehead reference electrode montages). <b>Results:</b> Statistically significant increases in P1 latency, decrease in N1 latency, reduction of P1-N1 interpeak interval, enlargement of both unrectified and electromyography-rectified amplitudes, and lower interaural amplitude asymmetry ratio were observed for the forehead electrode montage compared to the conventional zygomatic montage. <b>Conclusions:</b> mVEMP response waveforms obtained using forehead reference electrode montage are superior to the zygomatic montage. Hence, the forehead montage is suggested for further research on mVEMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a short-latency electromyographic potential that assesses the integrity of the vestibule-masseteric reflex pathway. Due to limited normative studies, there is no optimal mVEMP protocol to be implemented clinically. Apart from the conventional electrode configuration, a naïve montage referred to as the forehead reference has been used in recent studies. Purpose: This study compared latency and amplitude parameters of mVEMP between the zygomatic and forehead electrode configurations to address the optimal electrode montage to elicit mVEMP. Research Design: Cross-sectional research study. Study Sample: Thirty healthy participants (mean age: 23.3 years; 14 males and 16 females). Data Collection and Analysis: Participants underwent mVEMP testing under two-electrode montage conditions (zygomatic and forehead reference electrode montages). Results: Statistically significant increases in P1 latency, decrease in N1 latency, reduction of P1-N1 interpeak interval, enlargement of both unrectified and electromyography-rectified amplitudes, and lower interaural amplitude asymmetry ratio were observed for the forehead electrode montage compared to the conventional zygomatic montage. Conclusions: mVEMP response waveforms obtained using forehead reference electrode montage are superior to the zygomatic montage. Hence, the forehead montage is suggested for further research on mVEMP.

咬肌前庭诱发肌电位的最佳电极配置:颧骨和前额电极蒙太奇的比较。
背景:咬肌前庭诱发肌源电位(mVEMP)是一种短潜伏期肌电图电位,用于评估前庭咬肌反射通路的完整性。由于规范研究有限,目前尚无最佳的mVEMP临床实施方案。除了传统的电极配置外,在最近的研究中还使用了一种称为前额参考的naï;ve蒙太奇。目的:比较颧骨电极和前额电极诱发mVEMP的潜伏期和振幅参数,探讨诱发mVEMP的最佳电极蒙太奇。研究设计:横断面研究。研究样本:30名健康参与者(平均年龄:23.3 ;岁;14男16女)。数据收集和分析:参与者在双电极蒙太奇条件下(颧骨和前额参考电极蒙太奇)进行mVEMP测试。结果:与常规颧骨蒙太奇相比,前额电极蒙太奇的P1潜伏期增加,N1潜伏期减少,P1-N1峰间间隔缩短,未整流和整流肌电波幅均增大,耳间波幅不对称比降低,具有统计学意义。结论:采用前额参考电极蒙太奇获得的mVEMP响应波形优于颧参考电极蒙太奇。因此,前额蒙太奇可以作为进一步研究mVEMP的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信